Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:20:31.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Going Full Circle?: Integrating Provision for Young People in the Connexions Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

Kepa Artaraz*
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Social Policy, School of Applied Social Science, Mayfield House, Room 256, University of Brighton, Falmer Campus, Falmer BN1 9PH E-mail: k.artaraz@bton.ac.uk

Abstract

Welfare initiatives introduced by New Labour have emphasised the integration of service provision by sponsoring the creation of new professional roles and by promoting closer interagency links. The Connexions service exemplifies these two levels of integration. This article argues that the process of integration in Connexions was limited and it offers two main types of explanations. The first set concentrates on the changes brought to the professional role of Connexions workers. The second uses the example provided by interagency links between schools and the Connexions service in order to explore the role played by power relations to explain limitations to integration. The article concludes with a consideration of some of the effects brought about by Youth Matters and by the introduction of Children's Trusts on the provision of services for young people in the future.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, P., Barnes, T and Momen, A. (2002), ‘Making Connexions: a case study in contemporary social policy’, Critical Social Policy, 22, 2, 376388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artaraz, K. (2006), ‘The wrong person for the job? Professional habitus and working cultures in Connexions’, Critical Social Policy, 26, 4, 910931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balloch, S. and Taylor, M. (2001), Partnership Working: Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Britton, L., Chatrik, B., Coles, B., Craig, G. and Hylton, C. (2002), Missing Connexions: The Career Dynamics and Welfare Needs of Black and Minority Ethnic Young People at the Margins, Bristol: The Policy Press and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Catan, L. (2004), Becoming Adult: Changing Youth Transitions in the 21st Century, Brighton: Trust for the Study of Adolescence.Google Scholar
Coles, B. (2003), ‘Connexions: an outbreak in purple and orange’, Benefits, 11, 2, 9398.Google Scholar
Coles, B., Britton, L. and Hicks, L. (2004), Building Better Connections: Inter-Agency Work and the Connexions Strategy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Connexions Service National Unit [CSNU] (2000), Establishing the Connexions Service in Schools, Nottingham: DfEE Publications.Google Scholar
Connexions Service National Unit [CSNU] (2002), Implementing Connexions in Colleges, Nottingham: DfES Publications.Google Scholar
Children and Young People's Unit [CYPU] (2001), Tomorrow's Future: Building a Strategy for Children and Young People, London: CYPU.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment [DfEE] (2000)a, Connexions: The Best Start in Life for Every Young Person, Nottingham: DfEE.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment [DfEE] (2000)b, The Connexions Service: Professional Framework for Personal Advisers – Proposals for Consultation, Nottingham: DfEE.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment [DfEE] (2000)c, The Connexions Service: Prospectus and Specification, Nottingham: DfEE.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills [DfES] (2001), Implementing Connexions in Colleges, Nottingham: DfES Publications.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills [DfES] (2004), Connexions Service: Advice and Guidance for All Young People, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills [DfES] (2005), Youth Matters, Green Paper, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills [DfES] (2006), Youth Matters: Next Steps, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
ECOTEC (2006), Connexions Moving towards Childrens Trusts: A Report for the Department of Education and Skills, London: ECOTEC.Google Scholar
Francis, R. (2003), ‘Building Connexions: a toolkit to support the integration of Connexions in your school’, Connexions Service, at http://www.cegnet.co.uk/resource/content/files/337.pdf [accessed on 09.01.07].Google Scholar
Garrett, P. M. (2002), ‘Encounters in the new welfare domains of the Third Way: social work, the Connexions agency and personal advisers’, Critical Social Policy, 22, 4, 596618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, C. and Coleman, A. (2003), ‘Joint Working: The Health Service agenda’, Local Government Studies, 29, 3, 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, C., Dowling, B. and Powell, M. (2005), ‘Partnerships between health and social care under “New Labour”: smoke without fire? A review of policy and evidence’, Evidence and Policy, 1, 3, 365381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, B. and Giraud-Saunders, A. (2003), ‘Connecting with connexions: the role of the personal adviser with young people with special educational and support needs’, Support for learning, 18, 1, 1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, E. and Fletcher, J. (1999), ‘Learning how to change: a selective analysis of literature and experience of how teams learn and organisations change’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13, 1, 5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodkinson, P., Sparkes, A. and Hodkinson, H. (1996), Triumphs and Tears: Young People, Markets, and the Transition Form School to Work, London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, P. (1998), ‘How young people make career decisions’, Education and Training, 40, 6/7, 301306.Google Scholar
Hoggarth, L. and Smith, D. (2004), Understanding the Impact of Connexions on Young People at Risk, Research Report 607, Sheffield: DfES.Google Scholar
Hughes, D. (2005), Connexions: Developing Options and Opportunities, Centre for Guidance Studies', at http://www.derby.ac.uk/cegs/ [accessed 12/06/06].Google Scholar
Joyce, L., White, C. and Franses, A. (2004), Improve Your Connexions: Qualitative Research with Young People, Research Report RR481, Sheffield: DfES.Google Scholar
Leathard, A. (2003), Inter-Professional Collaboration: From Policy to Practice in Health and Social Care, London: Brunner Routledge.Google Scholar
Leitch, S. (2006) Leitch Review of Skills: Prosperity for All in the Global Economy, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
McQuaid, R. (2000), ‘The theory of partnership: why have partnerships?’, in Osborne, S. (ed.), Public–Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, C., Freeman, M. and Ross, R. (2001). Interprofessional Practice in Health and Social Care: Challenging the Shared Learning Agenda, London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Molyneux, J. (2001), ‘Interprofessional team working: what makes teams work well?’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 1, 2935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, M., Rickinson, M. and Davies, D. (2001), The Delivery of Career Guidance in Schools, Research Report 296, Sheffield: DfES.Google Scholar
National Evaluation of the Children's Fund [NECF] (2004), ‘Collaborating for the social inclusion of children and young people: emerging lessons from the first round of case studies’, Brief No RB596, DfES, Sheffield.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2003), ‘Review of career guidance policies: United Kingdom country note’, CEGS Occasional Paper, University of Derby.Google Scholar
Peck, E., Gulliver, P and Towell, D. (2002), ‘Governance of partnership between health and social services: the experience in Somerset’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 10, 5, 331338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, D. (2004), Careers Services: History, Policy and Practice in the UK, London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. and Dowling, B. (2006), ‘New Labour's partnerships: comparing conceptual models with existing forms’, Social Policy and Society, 5, 2, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poxton, R. (1999), Working across the Boundaries: Experiences of Primary Health and Social Care Partnerships in Practice, London: Kings Fund.Google Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit [SEU] (1999), Bridging the Gap: New Opportunities for 16–18-year-olds Not in Education, Employment or Training, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit [SEU] (2004), Tackling Social Exclusion: Taking Stock and Looking to the Future, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Walker, C. (1997), Britain Divided: The Growth of Social Exclusion in the 1980s and 1990s, London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
Watts, A. G. (2001)a, ‘Career guidance and social exclusion: a cautionary tale’, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 29, 2, 157176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, A. G. (2001)b, ‘Connexions: the role of the personal adviser in schools’, Pastoral Care in Education, 19, 4, 1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar