Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:15:27.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blueprints for the Future of Welfare Provision? Shared Features of Service Innovations across Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

Benjamin Ewert  and
Adalbert Evers
Benjamin Ewert
Affiliation:
Institute for Household Economics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen E-mail: benjamin.ewert@sowi.uni-giessen.de
Adalbert Evers
Affiliation:
Institute for Household Economics, Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen E-mail: adalbert.evers@uni-giessen.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses localised forms of social innovation in social services in relation to social policy and welfare issues. It draws upon research findings from the EU project ‘Welfare Innovations at the local Level in favour of Cohesion’ (WILCO), which takes in social innovations in twenty European cities. First, we argue why there is currently a significant gap between the debate on social innovation and the debate on social welfare reforms. Second, we present attempts that have been made to identify and interpret recurring approaches and instruments in the social innovations studied in relation to various dimensions of the debate on social welfare and services, such as the search for new ways of addressing users and citizens; the emphasis on new risks and related approaches to the issues of rights and responsibilities; and finally the concern with issues of governance. We argue that the features of the local innovations we identified may be significant for welfare systems at large, going beyond the introduction of special new items in special fields. However, the degree to which this will come about in reality will depend on building more bridges of shared understanding between concerns with social innovation on the one hand and welfare reforms on the other hand.

Keywords

Social Innovationgovernancesocial investment
Type
Themed Section on Social Innovation and Social Policy
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 423 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonoli, G. (2005) ‘The politics of the new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states’, Policy and Politics, 33, 3, 431–49.Google Scholar
Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA) (2010) Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation.pdf.Google Scholar
Defourny, J. (2009) The Worldwide Making of the Social Economy: Innovations and Changes, Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002 ) Why We Need a New Welfare State, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012) Strengthening Social Innovation in Europe: Journey to Effective Assessment and Metrics, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/social-innovation/strengthening-social-innovation_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Evers, A. and Laville, J.-L. (2004) The Third Sector in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Evers, A., Ewert, B. and Brandsen, T. (2014) Social Innovations for Social Cohesion: Transnational Patterns and Approaches from 20 European Cities, Liege: EMES European Research Network, http://www.wilcoproject.eu/ereader-wilco/.Google Scholar
Ewert, B. and Evers, A. (2012) ‘Co-production: contested meanings and challenges for user organizations’, in Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V. and Verschuere, B. (eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013) Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. and Harrisson, D. (2013) ‘Social innovation research in the European Union: approaches, findings and future directions’, Policy Review, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (2010) Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?: Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, G., Ali, R., Halkett, R. and Sanders, B. (2007) In and Out of Sync: The Challenge of Growing Social Innovations, London: NESTA, http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/assets/features/in_and_out_of_sync.Google Scholar
Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nyssens, M. (2006) Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Osborne, S. (2013) ‘A service influenced approach to public service innovation?’, in Osborne, S. and Brown, L. (eds.), Handbook of Innovation in Public Services, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 60–71.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2013) Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1993) ‘Capability and well-being’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A. (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 30–53.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (2008) ‘Are partnerships innovative?’, in Svensson, L. (ed.), Partnership, Stockholm: Academic Press Sweden, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. (1994) A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline, London: Routledge.Google Scholar