Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:20:16.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Antagonisms of Choice: New Labour and the reform of public services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

John Clarke
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University E-mail: john.clarke@open.ac.uk
Janet Newman
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University E-mail: john.clarke@open.ac.uk
Louise Westmarland
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University E-mail: john.clarke@open.ac.uk

Abstract

Choice has emerged as a key idea for the reform of public services in the UK and internationally. This paper explores three sets of problems in the analysis of choice in public policy. First, at what level should we be studying choice (specific mechanisms, national politics, transnational processes and travelling ideas)? Second, what sorts of tendencies, forces and discourses are being mobilised through the politics of choice? Third, we examine the ‘antagonisms of choice’: exploring the different and possibly divergent political conflicts that surround choice in public policy. We examine three types of antagonism: around inequalities, power and publicness.

Type
Themed Section on Choice or voice
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, S. (2008), Education (Policy and Politics in the Twenty-first Century). Reforming our Public Services. Bristol, Policy Press, London, OPSR.Google Scholar
Blair, T. (2002), Preface to Office of Public Service Reform, 8.Google Scholar
Blair, T. (2003), ‘Progress and justice in the 21st century’, Fabian Society Annual Lecture, Fabian Society, 17 June.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. and Palan, R. (2004), The Imagined Economies of Globalisation, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. (2007), ‘“It's not like shopping”: citizens, consumers and the reform of public services’, in Bevir, M. and Trentmann, F. (eds), Governance, Citizens, and Consumers: Agency and Resistance in Contemporary Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997), The Managerial State, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clarke, J., Smith, N. and Vidler, E. (2006), ‘The indeterminacy of choice: political, policy and organisational instabilities’, Social Policy and Society, 5 (3), 327336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E. and Westmarland, L. (2007), Creating Citizen-Consumers, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2004), Corporate Power and Social Policy in a Global Economy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2001), One Market Under Good: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Greener, I. (2003), ‘Who choosing what? The evolution of the use of ‘choice’ in the NHS, and its importance for New Labour’, in Bochel, C., Ellison, N. and Powell, M. (eds), Social Policy Review, 15, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, M. (2006), ‘Consumers in charge of care: the Dutch Personal Budget and its impact on the market, professionals and the family’, European Societies, 8, 3, 385402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2004), Poverty, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Macpherson, W. (1999), The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (Report of an Inquiry by Sir William Macpherson of Cluny). London. The Stationery Office, Cm 4262-I.Google Scholar
Milburn, A. (2002), Speech by the Secretary of State for Health to the New Health Network, 14 January 2002.Google Scholar
Ministers of State for Department of Health, Local and Regional Government, and School Standards (2004), ‘The Case for user choice in public services’, A Joint Memorandum to the Public Administration Select Committee Inquiry into Choice, Voice and Public Services.Google Scholar
Office of Public Service Reform (2002), Reforming our Public Services, London: OPSR.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1999), Powers of Freedom, Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006), ‘Rethinking theories of the state in an age of globalisation’, in Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (eds), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar