Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-7lw58 Total loading time: 0.287 Render date: 2023-02-03T11:38:57.207Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Retrenched, Reconfigured and Broken: The British Welfare State after a Decade of Austerity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Kevin Farnsworth*
Affiliation:
University of York, UK E-mail: kevin.farnsworth@york.ac.uk

Abstract

This article is an attempt to take stock and critically reflect on the UK’s decade of austerity and social policy hostility over the past decade. It distinguishes between economic and political austerity and digs deeper into the data on expenditure in order to examine the impact of austerity on British public expenditure and politics. It argues that the decade of austerity was a hostile one for British social policy which not only undermined the financial base of key parts of the welfare state, it reshaped it and redefined its priorities, setting in train a series of subsequent events that would further change, not just British social policies, but British economics, polity and politics. And, as subsequent crises – notably Brexit and the Covid-19 pandemic – testify, crisis events tend to be linked, and each one shapes and influences the ability of the state to respond to the next.

Type
Themed Section: A Hostile Decade for Social Policy: Economic Crisis, Political Crisis and Austerity 2010-20
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armingeon, K. (2013) ‘Breaking with the past? Why the global financial crisis led to austerity policies but not to the modernization of the welfare state’, in Pierson, C., Castles, F. G. and Naumann, I. K. (eds.), The Welfare State Reader, 3rd edn, London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bacon, R. and Eltis, W. (1976) Britain’s Economic Problem: Too Few Producers, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barnard, H. (2018) UK Poverty 2018, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Bell, S. (2011) ‘Do we really need a new ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to explain institutional change?’, British Journal of Political Science, 41, 4, 883906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, M. (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2009) Conservative Spring Conference Speech, Politics.co.uk, https://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2009/04/27/tory-spring-conference-speeches-in-full [accessed 01.07.20].Google Scholar
Corlett, A., Leslie, J. and Tomlinson, D. (2020) The Trillion-Pound Question: Spring Budget 2020 and the Tension between Higher Spending, Low Taxes and Fiscal Credibility, London: Resolution Foundation, https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/2020/02/The-trillion-pound-question.pdf [accessed 01.08.20].Google Scholar
De Agostini, P., Hills, J. and Sutherland, H. (2018) ‘Were we really all in it together? The distributional effects of the 2010–15 UK coalition government’s tax-benefit policy changes’, Social Policy and Administration, 52, 5, 929–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorling, D. (2016) ‘Brexit: the decision of a divided country’, BMJ, 354, i3697, doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelman (2020) Edelman Trust Barometer, 2020, Washington: Edelman, https://www.edelman.com/trustbarometer [accessed 11.07.20].Google Scholar
Edmiston, D. (2018) Welfare, Inequality and Social Citizenship: Deprivation and Affluence in Austerity, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2012) Social Versus Corporate Welfare: Competing Needs and Interests within the Welfare State, London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2013) ‘Bringing corporate welfare in’, Journal of Social Policy, 42, 1, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2019) ‘Towards a whole economy of welfare’, Social Policy Review, 31, 7199.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (2015) ‘Austerity: more than the sum of its parts’, in Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z., (eds.), Social Policy in Times of Austerity: Global Economic Crisis and the New Politics of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press, 942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (2018) ‘Who benefits and who pays?’, in Millar, J. and Sainsbury, R. (eds.), Social Security, Bristol: Policy Press, 159–78.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, A. (2012) Crisis Without End?: The Unravelling of Western Prosperity, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Genschel, P. (2004) ‘Globalization and the welfare state: a retrospective’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 613–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (1979) The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guajardo, J., Leigh, D. and Pescatori, A. (2014) ‘Expansionary austerity?’, International Evidence, Journal of the European Economic Association, 12, 4, 949–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M. (2012) ‘Economic crises and paradigm change’, in Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds.), Social Policy in Challenging Times: Economic Crisis and Welfare Systems, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Households Below Average Income (HBAI) (2019) Households Below Average Income: 1994/5-2017–18, London: Department for Work and Pensions/National Statistics Office, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/households-below-average-income-199495-to-201718 [accessed 01.03.20].Google Scholar
IFS (2019) Spending Review 2019: Deal or No Deal, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. (2018) The Future of Benefits, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
ILO (2015) World Employment and Social Outlook 2015: The Changing Nature of Jobs, Geneva: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
ILO and OECD (2015) The Labour Share in G20 Economies: Report prepared for the G20 Employment Working Group Antalya, Turkey, 26-27 February 2015, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
IMF (2009) Fiscal Monitor, Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
IMF (2013) Fiscal Monitor, Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
IMF (2018) Fiscal Monitor: Managing Public Wealth, Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2019) Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kersbergen, K.v., Vis, B. and Hemerijck, A. (2014), ‘The Great Recession and Welfare State Reform: Is Retrenchment Really the Only Game Left in Town?’, Social Policy and Administration, 48: 7, 883–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (2015) ‘The case for cuts was a lie. Why does Britain still believe it? The austerity delusion’, The Guardian, 29 April.Google Scholar
Marmot, M., Allen, J., Boyce, T., Goldblatt, T. and Morrison, J. (2020) Health Equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 Years On, London: Institute of Health Equity.Google Scholar
Mason, R. and Wintour, P. (2013) ‘Nick Clegg persuades Lib Dems to stick with austerity’, The Guardian, 16 September.Google Scholar
NEF (2013) Framing the Economy, London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St Martins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2018) Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD Statistics (2020) http://stats.oecd.org [accessed 01.06.20].Google Scholar
Office for Budgetary Responsibility (2020) Welfare Trends Report, December 2019, London: Crown/Open Government License.Google Scholar
Osborne, G. (2012) ‘Speech to the Conservative Party Conference reproduced in full’, New Statesman, https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/george-osbornes-speech-conservative-conference-full-text, 8 October [accessed 28.08.20].Google Scholar
Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P. and Furceri, D. (2016) ‘Neoliberalism: oversold?’, Finance and Development, 53, 2.Google Scholar
Oxfam (2014) Working for the Few, Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
Pettifor, A. (2017) The Production of Money, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M. (1988) ‘Structural dependence of the state on capital’, American Political Science Review, 82, 1, 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Expenditure Statistical Analysis (PESA) (2010) London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Public Expenditure Statistical Analysis (PESA) (2015) London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Public Expenditure Statistical Analysis (PESA) (2018) London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. S. (2010) ‘Growth in a time of debt’, American Economic Review, 100, 2, 573–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, L. (2014) ‘”We’re reaping what we sowed”: everyday crisis narratives and acquiescence to the age of austerity’, New Political Economy, 19, 6, 895917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2019) People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2017) How Will Capitalism End?, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Treanor, J. (2017) ‘Darling: Brexit would not have happened without banking crisis’, The Guardian, 13 September.Google Scholar
Wallace, R., Liebman, A., Chaves, L. F. and Wallace, R. (2020) ‘COVID-19 and circuits of capital’, Monthly Review(01/04).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, N. (2013) ‘David Cameron makes leaner state a permanent goal’, The Guardian, 12 November.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (2020) The UK: A Parable of Distrust, Washington: Edelman.Google Scholar
Zaranko, B. (2020) What Does the Budget Mean for Public Services, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Retrenched, Reconfigured and Broken: The British Welfare State after a Decade of Austerity
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Retrenched, Reconfigured and Broken: The British Welfare State after a Decade of Austerity
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Retrenched, Reconfigured and Broken: The British Welfare State after a Decade of Austerity
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *