Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:25:51.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disability and Social (In)Security: Emotions, Contradictions of ‘Inclusion’ and Employment and Support Allowance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2012

Chris Grover  and
Linda Piggott
Chris Grover
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Science, Lancaster University E-mail: c.grover@lancaster.ac.uk
Linda Piggott
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Social Science, Lancaster University E-mail: l.piggott@lancaster.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The focus of this article is on the ways in which emotions are engaged in the discursive construction and treatment of disabled people in receipt of social security benefits. The article draws upon the literature related to the social importance of emotions and that concerned with moral boundary drawing. It argues that the evocation of emotional reactions is crucial in understanding the ways in which changes to out-of-work benefits for disabled people (the development of Employment and Support Allowance) have recently been effected and the ways in which this has reflected a desire to more closely denote those judged able and not able to work in a redrawing of the ‘disability category’. While this has been done in the name of ‘inclusion’, the article concludes that its consequences are, in various ways, the ‘exclusion’ and stigmatisation of disabled people.

Keywords

Disabled peopleemotionsexclusioninclusionsocial security
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 369 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, L. and Lutz, A. (1990) ‘Introduction: emotion, discourse, and the politics of everyday life’, in Lutz, A. and Abu-Lughod, L. (eds.), Language and the Politics of Emotion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. (1992) Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People, Halifax: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People and Ryburn Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (2011) Incapacity Benefit Reform: The Local, Regional and National Impact, Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Briant, E., Watson, N. and Philo, G. (2011) Bad News for Disabled People: How the Newspapers are Reporting Disability, Project Report, Glasgow: Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research and Glasgow Media Unit, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Chancellor of the Exchequer (2010) Budget 2010, HC 61, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Chunn, D. and Gavigan, S. (2004) ‘Welfare law, welfare fraud and moral regulation of the “never deserving” poor’, Social and Legal Studies, 13, 2, 219–43.Google Scholar
Deacon, A. (2002) Perspectives on Welfare: Ideas, Ideologies and Policy Debates, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2009) Work Capability Assessment Internal Review, Report of the Working Group Commissioned by the Department for Work and Pensions, London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Drakeford, M. (1998) ‘Last rights? Funerals, poverty and social exclusion’, Journal of Social Policy, 27, 4, 507–24.Google Scholar
Eger, M. (2010) ‘Even in Sweden: the effect of immigration on support for welfare spending’, European Sociological Review, 26, 2, 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1995) The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda, London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Garthwaite, K. (2011) ‘The language of shirkers and scroungers? Talking about illness, disability and Coalition welfare reform’, Disability and Society, 26, 3, 369–72.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, N. (1979) Class, Capital and Social Policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, P. (1999) ‘Thinking the unthinkable: welfare reform and the media’, in Franklin, B. (ed.), Social Policy, the Media and Misrepresentation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Golding, P. and Middleton, S. (1982) Images of Welfare, Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2007) ‘Social security, employment and incapacity benefit: critical reflections on A New Deal for Welfare’, Disability and Society, 22, 7, 733–46.Google Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2010) ‘From incapacity benefit to employment and support allowance: social sorting, sick and impaired people and social security’, Policy Studies, 31, 2, 265–82.Google Scholar
Hancock, A. (2004) The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Haylett, C. (2001) ‘Illegitimate subjects? Abject whites, neoliberal modernisation, and middle-class multiculturalism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 3, 351–70.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, G. (1970) ‘Bentham's Utopia: the national charity company’, Journal of British Studies, 10, 1, 80–125.Google Scholar
Hutcherson, C. and Gross, J. (2011) ‘The moral emotions: a social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 4, 719–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izard, C. (1977) Human Emotions, New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. (2000) ‘Housing benefit and welfare retrenchment in Britain’, Journal of Social Policy, 29, 2, 236–79.Google Scholar
Lawler, S. (2005) ‘Disgusted subjects: the making of middle-class identities’, The Sociological Review, 53, 3, 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, R. (1996) ‘The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony’, Critical Social Policy, 16, 46, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, R. (1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (2002) ‘Pedophiles and cyber-predators as contaminating forces: the language of disgust, pollution, and boundary invasions in federal debates on sex offender legislation’, Law and Social Inquiry, 27, 3, 529–66.Google Scholar
Macmillan (2010) Failed by the System: Why the Employment and Support Allowance Isn't Working for People Living with Cancer, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Messere, T. and Stenger, J. (2007), ‘Employment and support allowance: testing times ahead?’, Benefits: The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 15, 3, 329–31.Google Scholar
Miller, W. (1997) The Anatomy of Disgust, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mind (2010) New Benefit Test Will Fail to Spot Illness and Disability, http://www.mind.org.uk/news/3166_new_benefit_test_will_fail_to_spot_illness_and_disability [accessed 09.08.2010].Google Scholar
Murray, C. (1990) The Emerging British Underclass, London: Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (1994) Underclass: The Crisis Deepens, London: Institute of Economic Affairs, Health and Welfare Unit.Google Scholar
NACAB (National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux) (2010) Not Working: CAB Evidence on the ESA Work Capability Assessment, CAB briefing, London: NACAB.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2004) Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olatunji, B. and Sawchuk, C. (2005) ‘Disgust: characteristic features, social manifestations and clinical implications’, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 7, 932–62.Google Scholar
Piggott, L. and Grover, C. (2009) ‘Retrenching incapacity benefit: employment support allowance and paid work’, Social Policy and Society, 8, 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poynter, J. (1969) Society and Pauperism: English Ideas on Poor Relief 1795–1834, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puttick, K. (2007) ‘Empowering the incapacitated worker? The employment and support allowance and pathways to work’, Industrial Law Journal, 36, 3, 388–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. (1999) The Powers of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N., O'Malley, P. and Valverde, M. (2006) ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulstone, A. (2000) ‘Disability, dependency and the new deal for disabled people’, Disability and Society, 15, 3, 427–43.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S. and Haidt, J. (1999) ‘The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, dis-gust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity)’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 4, 574–86.Google Scholar
Sayer, A. (2005) ‘Class, moral worth and recognition’, Sociology, 39, 5, 947–63.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2008) Raising Expectations and Increasing Support: Reforming Welfare for the Future, Cm 7506, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2010) 21st Century Welfare, Cm 7913, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, T. (1994) ‘Cultural representation of disabled people: dustbins for disavowal?’, Disability and Society, 9, 3, 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, G. and Haidt, J. (2011) ‘Cuteness and disgust: the humanizing and dehumanizing effects of emotion’, Emotion Review, 3, 3, 245–51.Google Scholar
Siebers, T. (2003) ‘What can disability studies learn from the culture wars?’, Cultural Critique, 55, 182–216.Google Scholar
Soldatic, K. and Meekosha, H. (2012), ‘The place of disgust: disability, class and gender in spaces of workfare’, Societies, 2, 3, 139–56.Google Scholar
Soldatic, K. and Pini, B. (2009) ‘The three Ds of welfare reform: disability, disgust and deservingness’, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15, 1, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. (1984) The Disabled State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G., Rose, D., Kassam, A. and Sartorius, N. (2007) ‘Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination?’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 192–3.Google Scholar
Tyler, I. (2008) ‘’Chav mum chav scum’ class disgust in contemporary Britain’, Feminist Media Studies, 8, 1, 17–34.Google Scholar
Vartanian, L. (2010) ‘Disgust and perceived control in attitudes towards obese people’, International Journal of Obesity, 34, 1302–7.Google Scholar
Welshman, J. (2006) ‘From the cycle of deprivation to social exclusion: five continuities’, The Political Quarterly, 77, 4, 475–84.Google Scholar
Work and Pensions Committee (2011) The Role of Incapacity Benefit Reassessment in Helping Claimants into Employment, House of Commons, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar