Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T07:10:54.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natives with jackets and degrees. Othering, objectification and the role of Palestinians in the co-existence field in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Dan Rabinowitz
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Anthropology, Herbrew University, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 91905 msdan@mscc.huji.ac.il
Get access

Abstract

The co-existence field in Israel is a rather loose array of NGOs and government sponsored organisations. Its main trajectory since the 1980s was structured meetings between Jewish Israelis and Palestinian citizens of Israel at intermediate and secondary school levels. It is, ostensibly, a mutual affair, enabling actors on both sides to experience each other first hand as a means to improve relations and reduce tension. A closer examination, however, reveals that key aspects of the field were in designed primarily for Israeli consumption. Palestinian participants and moderators thus tend to become objectified, mere illustrations in an all-Israeli debate which takes place, as it were, above the Palestinian's head.

The history of the field is briefly sketched, followed by an analysis of the theoretical, ideological and political assumptions of two of the main schools of thought within it. The role of Palestinians is then examined, using input from ethnographic interviews and content analysis of published material. This becomes the basis for an alternative historicisation of the field, re-framed within the political and social context of Israel since 1977.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 European Association of Social Anthropologists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on fieldwork carried out as part of the research group established by the Van-Leer Jerusalem Foundation (VLJF) to produce a critical review of VLJF's own efforts towards co-existence since the late 1970s. I am grateful to the VLJF for the funding which enabled me to carry out my portion of the project. I am also indebted to Adi Ofir, the project coordinator, and to him and to Yoav Peled, Khanan Khever, Ariela Azulay, Jose Bronner, Amnon Raz-Krakotzkin, Lea Rozen, Ahmad Sa’adi, ’Azmi Bishara, Yehuda Shenhav, Gideon Kunda, Yif’at Ma’oz and Shlomo Fisher for insights gleened through the lively and stimulating debate within the group. The sole responsibility for views and errors in this article remain my own.