Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:01:29.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving to Moscow: Patterns of Peasant In-Migration during the First Five-Year Plan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

David L. Hoffmann
David L. Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
Harvard Russian Research Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When an eighteen-year-old peasant named Evgenii Mikhailovich Kostin stepped off a train in Moscow in October 1931 he felt overwhelmed by milling throngs of unfamiliar people and frightened by the commotion of the city. Yet his adjustment to urban life proved much less traumatic than his initial impression had portended; relatives housed him, an acquaintance from his village found him a job, and friends showed him around Moscow. Kostin was one of at least 23 million Soviet peasants who moved permanently to cities between 1926 and 1939—marking what demographers estimate to be the most rapid urbanization in world history. In the First Five-Year Plan alone Moscow’s population increased nearly 60 percent (an added 1,349,500 people) to reach 3,663,300 by the end of 1932. Scholars have portrayed peasant in-migration to Soviet cities during the 1930s either as a phenomenon tightly regulated by the state or, alternatively, as chaos and upheaval; but, as this article will demonstrate, the process by which peasants found their way to Moscow during the First Five-Year Plan was neither controlled nor chaotic.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , Winter 1991 , pp. 847 - 857
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, Inc. 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Interview with Evgenii Mikhailovich Kostin at the Hammer and Sickle Metallurgical Plant, Moscow (16 May 1989).

2. Trud v SSSR (Moscow: Gosplan, 1936), 7 Google Scholar; Lorimer, Frank, Population of the Soviet Union (Geneva: League of Nations, 1946), 149 Google Scholar; Lewis, Robert A. and Rowland, Richard H., Population Redistribution in the USSR (New York: Praeger, 1979), 214 Google Scholar; Hamm, Michael F., “The Modern Russian City: An Historiographical Analysis,” Journal of Urban History, 4 (November 1977): 53–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. TsGAORgM (Tsentral’nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Oktiabr’skoi Revoliutsii goroda Moskvy) f. 126, op. 10, d. 47,1. 16.

4. See for example, Fainsod, Merle, How Russia is Ruled (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), 533, 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lewin, Moshe, The Making of the Soviet System (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985), 303 Google Scholar.

5. Johnson, Robert E., Peasant and Proletarian (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1979), 53–58 Google Scholar. Danilov, V. P., “Kresťianskii otkhod na promysly v 1920-kh godakh,” Istoricheskie zapiski, no. 94 (1974): 104–105 Google Scholar; Khriashcheva, A.I., “Drobinosť kresťianskogo khoziaistva i differentsiia,” Ekonomicheskoe obozrenie, no. 6 (1927): 107 Google Scholar; Chase, William, Workers, Society, and the Soviet State (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1987), 136 Google Scholar.

6. “Kollektivizatsiia: Istoki, sushchnosť, posledstviia. Beseda za ‘kniglym stolom’,” Istorila SSSR, no. 3 (1989): 38, 44-45. A note from Iagoda to Stalin in January 1932 stated that, since 1929, 540,000 kulaks had been deported to the Urals, 375,000 to Siberia, more than 190,000 to Kazakhstan, and more than 130,000 to the far north. Authorities deported very few of the peasants imprisoned as kulaks to Moscow; forced labor was used outside the city to dig the Moscow-Volga Canal, and small numbers of prisoners worked on construction of the Moscow Metro and the never-completed palace of soviets (TsGAORgM f. 150, op. 5, d. 24b; Harvard Emigre Interview Project, no. 118 HD). While the topic of deportations and forced labor assumes far greater importance for other regions of the country, it will not be treated in further detail here.

7. For a full discussion of the causes of such massive in-migration, see Hoffmann, David L., “Urbanization and Social Change during Soviet Industrialization: In-Migration to Moscow, 1929-1937” (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1990), 44–68 Google Scholar.

8. KPSS v resoliutsiiakh i resheniiakh s”ezdov, konferentsii i plenumov TsK (Moscow: Partizdat, 1984) 5:53; Nobuaki Shiokawa, “The Soviet Working Class under the Stalinist System, 1929-1933” (summary of his book in Japanese of the same title), 6-7.

9. Panfilova, A. M., Formirovanie rabochego/classa SSSR v gody pervoi piatiletki (1928-1932) (Moscow: Izdatel’stvo moskovskogo universiteta, 1964), 92 Google Scholar.

10. TsGAOR (Tsentral’nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Oktiabr’skoi Revoliutsii) f. 5515, op. 1, d. 191, I. 191; Narkomtrud, Izvestiia. Ofitsial’noe izdanie, no. 19 (1930): 418-420. See also MPA (Moskovskii Partiinyi Arkhiv) f. 635, op. 1, d. 41,1. 33.

11. TsGAOR f. 5475, op. 13, d. 194,1. 13.

12. TsGANKh (Tsentral’nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Narodnogo Khoziaistva) f. 7446, op. 8, d. 88, II. 70-72.

13. For more on the course of the collectivization drive, see Davies, Robert W., The Socialist Offensive: The Collectivization of Soviet Agriculture 1929-1930 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 88,11. 2-3; MPA f. 634, op. 1, d. 207,11. 60-61.

15. TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 101,1. 19; d. 232,1. 50.

16. Davies, Robert W., The Soviet Collective Farm, 1929-1930 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980), 163–164 Google Scholar.

17. Stalin, Iosif V., Sochineniia (Moscow: Gospolizdat, 1951): 52–54.Google Scholar Sobrante zakonov i rasporiazhanii SSSR, no. 42 (1931): Article 286. TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 241, 11. 70-74; d. 232, 11. 1-5.

18. Dadykin, R. P., “O chislennosti i istochnikakh popolneniia rabochego klassa SSSR (1928-1937 gg.),” lstoricheskie zapiski 87 (1971), 41–45 Google Scholar; Panfilova, Formirovanie rabochego klassa, 106; Voprosy truda, no. 7 (1932): 11-16; TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 240,11. 7-9.

19. TsGAOR f. 5515, op. 17, d. 212, 1. 7; TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 232, 1. 100; Moskovskaia promyshlermaia kooperatsiia, no. 7 (August 1931): 12; Rabochaia Moskva, 7 October 1931, 2; Voprosy truda no. 7 (1932): 3-4. TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 88, U. 2-3.

20. Panfilova, Formirovanie rabochego klassa, 117-118. Voprosy truda, no. 7 (1932): 5. TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 232,1. 4. The internal passport system was introduced on 27 December 1932. In conjunction with a residence permit required to live in any large city, these systems somewhat limited peasant departure from collective farms beginning with the Second Five-Year Plan. Peasants living within a 100-kilometer zone around Moscow, however, received passports, and seasonal laborers got temporary certificates allowing them to live in the city (Sobrame zakonov, no. 84 [1932]: Articles 516, 517; no. 28 [1933] Article 168). The widespread availability of forged documents allowed many peasants without passports to move to Moscow as well; Janucy K. Zawodny, “Twenty-six Interviews with Former Soviet Factory Workers” (Hoover Archives) 1/12; British Foreign Office. Russia—Correspondence 17250, 269; Vecherniaia Moskva 8 May 1934; TsGAORgMf. 214, op. l,d. 284,1. 10. For further discussion regarding the effect of the passport system on in-migration, see Fitzpatrick, Sheila, “The Great Departure: Rural-Urban Migration, 1929-1933” (Paper, 1988), 10–11 Google Scholar.

21. Only 34 percent of all peasant-workers in the national industrial work force came from collective farms in 1931, a figure that indicated that a majority of peasants obtaining industrial employment were non-collectivized; Vdovin, A. I. and Drobizhev, V. Z., Rost rabochego klassa SSSR 1917-1940 gg. (Moscow: Mysl’, 1976), 118 Google Scholar. See also MPA f. 432, op. 1, d. 49,1. 107.

22. Industrializatsiia SSSR. Dokumenty i materialy 4 vols. (Moscow: Nauka, 1970) 2:423-425. Sobrame zakonov i rasporiazhenii SSSR, no. 60 (1931) Article 385. TsGAMO (Tsentral’nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Moskovksoi Oblasti) f. 6833, op. 1, d. 46,11.65-75.

23. Schwarz, Solomon, Labor in the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1951), 59 Google Scholar; Byli industrialny e. Ocherki i vospominaniia (Moscow: Polizdat, 1973), 168; Gol’tsman, M. T., “Sostav stroitel’nykh rabochikh SSSR v gody pervoi piatiletki” in Izmeneniia v chislennosti i sostav Sovetskogo rabochego klassa (Moscow: Nauka, 1961), 134 Google Scholar; MPA f. 429, op. 1, d. 109,1. 209.

24. TsGAOR f. 5515, op. 1, d. 441,1.1.

25. TsGAMO f. 4867, op. 1, d. 156, Il. 21-22; Panfilova, Formirovanie rabochego klassa, 30, 160. On the Second Five-Year Plan, see MPA f. 69, op. 1, d. 947,1. 12; f. 468, op. 1, d. 155, l. 207; TsGANKh f. 7622, op. 1, d. 251,1. 2.

26. Monkhouse, Allan, Moscow 1911-1933: Being the Memoirs of Allan Monkhouse (New York; Arno, 1970), 212 Google Scholar; Burrell, George, An American Engineer Looks at Russia (Boston: Stratford, 1932), 64 Google Scholar; Mandelstam, Nadezhda, Hope against Hope, trans. Hayward, Max (New York: Atheneum, 1970), 97 Google Scholar; Ehrenburg, Ilia, A Street in Moscow, trans. Volochova, Sonia (New York: Covici-Friede, 1932), 6–7 Google Scholar.

27. Ordzhonikidze, Grigorii Konstantinovich, Stať i i rechi, (Moscow: Gospolizdat, 1957) 2:412 Google Scholar. Kliarnkin, Igor, “Pochemu trudno govoriť pravdu,” Novyi mir, no. 2 (1989): 228 Google Scholar; “Osnovnye etapy razvitiia sovetskogo obshchestva. ‘Kmglyi stol’,” Kommunist, no. 12 (1987): 72 (remarks by Drobizhev, V. Z.)Google Scholar; Lewin, Making of the Soviet System, 221 ; Andrle, Vladimir, Workers in Stalin’s Russia: Industrialization and Social Change in a Planned Economy (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988), 55–57 Google Scholar.

28. “Kollektivizatsiia,” 52. Harvard Project, no. 333 JF; Istorila metro Moskvy; rasskazy stroitelei metro, ed. Kosarev, A. (Moscow: Istorila fabrik i zavodov, 1935), 163 Google Scholar; Nezabyvaemye 30-e. Vospominaniia veteranov partii — moskvichei (Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii, 1986), 68–69 Google Scholar; TsGAORgM f. 150, op. 5, d. 66, 1. 94. See also K. Stolee, Margaret, “Homeless Children in the USSR, 1917-1957” Soviet Studies 40 (January 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Lee, Everett, “A Theory of Migration” Demography 3, no. 1 (1966): 54–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Tilly, Charles, An Urban World (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1974), 88 Google Scholar, 91-95; Bodnar, John, The Transplanted: A History of Immigrants in Urban America (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), 57 Google Scholar.

30. Harvard Project, no. 107 AD; no. 476 SH; no. 640 RS. S. Klivanskii, “Otkhodnichestvo v SSSR v 1928/29-1931 gg.” Voprosy truda, no. 10 (1932): 68.

31. A distinction with regard to in-migration during the 1930s should be made between old industrial centers, such as Moscow, and newly established cities, such as Magnitogorsk, Prokop’evsk, Karaganda, Kirovsk, and Komsomol’sk. The traditions and networks that had guided peasants to Moscow for generations and continued to do so in the 1930s did not exist for these new sites. See Arutiunian, lu. V., “Kollektivizatsiia sel’skogo khoziaistva i vysvobozhdenie rabochei sily dlia promyshlennosti,” Formirovanie i razvitie sovetskogo rabochego klassa (1917-1961 gg.) (Moscow: Nauka, 1964), 114–115 Google Scholar.

32. Perepis’ Moskvy 1902 g. (Moscow: Moskovskoe statisticheskoe upravlenie, 1906) 2:24-27; Vsesoiuznaia perepis’ naseleniia 1926 g. (Moscow: Tsentral’noe statisticheskoe upravlenie SSSR, 1928-1933) 39:216-221; TsGANKh f. 1562, op. 20, d. 25,1. 6.

33. Administrativno-territorial’noe delenie Soiuza SSR (Moscow: NKVD RSFSR, 1929) 32.

34. Vsesoiuznaia perepis’ naseleniia 1926 g. 36:216-221; see also Chase, Workers, Society, and the Soviet State, 79. The 1902 census showed slightly higher percentages arriving from the territory that was to become Moscow oblast (59 percent) and from the central industrial region as a whole (75 percent) (Perepis’ Moskvy 1902 g. 2:24-27). These percentages should not be taken as exact, for the reordering of data to establish comparable units involves some approximation; nonetheless, these figures provide a generaljjasis for establishing continuity in migration trends.

35. Anderson, Barbara A., Internal Migration during Modernization in Late Nineteenth-Century Russia (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980), 105–106 Google Scholar; Bradley, Joseph, Muzhik and Muscovite. Urbanization in Late Imperial Russia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), 105–107, 120Google Scholar; Chase, Workers, Society, and the Soviet State, 81.

36. TsGAOR f. 5451, op. 13, d. 76,11. 47-49; TsGAMO f. 4867, op. 1, d. 156, 11. 3-5; Strievskii, K., Material’noe i kul’turnoe polozhenie moskovskikh rabochikh. Doklad na IV ob”edinennom Plenume MK i MKK VKP(b) (Moscow: Trud i Kniga, 1929), 9 Google Scholar. Systematic data below the oblast level do not exist after 1929, but the factory data cited here provide at least a general picture of migration trends.

37. Rybakovskii, L. L., ed., Naselenie SSSR za 70 let (Moscow: Nauka, 1988), 51 Google Scholar. Famine regions and rural areas immediately surrounding other industrial centers (especially the Donbass) also experienced significant depopulation.

38. See Lee, “Theory of Migration,” 48.

39. Morrison, Daniel, “ ‘Trading Peasants’ and Urbanization in Eighteenth Century Russia” (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1972)Google Scholar; Bokarev, lu. P., Biudzhetnye obsledovaniia kresťianskikh khoziaistv 20-kh godov kak istoricheskii istochnik (Moscow: Nauka, 1981), 228–229 Google Scholar. Bradley, Muzhik and Muscovite, 168; TsGAMO f. 4867, op. 1, d. 156,11. 3-5.

40. TsGAMO f. 6833, op. 1, d. 46,1. 65; Sputnikku’ltrabotnika sredi sezonnikov (Moscow: Rabotnik prosveshcheniia, 1930), 13; Rabochii klasš —vedushchaia sila v stroiteľstve sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva 1921-1937 gg. vol. 2 of Istorila Sovetskogo rabochego klassa, ed. L. S. Rogachevskaia and A.M. Sivolobov (Moscow: Nauka, 1984), 202.

41. Danilov, “Kresťianskii otkhod na promysly,” 90, 97; Otkhod seVskogo naseleniia na zarabotki v SSSR v 1926127 g. (Moscow: Narkomtrud, 1929), 48 ff.

42. TsGAOR f. 5475, op. 13, d. 276, 1. 14; TsGANKh f. 7446, op. 8, d. 88, 1. 134; Sovetskoe kraevedenie 1932, no. 4, 35-36.

43. One peasant in Riazan province had a brother-in-law living in Moscow who not only encouraged him to move there, but also promised him a job in the same factory shop where the brother-in-law was already working; interview with Aleksandr Maksimovich Korneev, Hammer and Sickle Plant, Moscow (24 April 1989). Another peasant followed her husband to the city after he had found a job, and she soon began work in the same factory; Harvard Project #107 AD. A sixteen-year-old peasant planning to study in the city moved in with his uncle there and soon joined him in transportation work; Molodaia gvardiia transporta (Moscow: Gudok, 1936), 187-193.

44. AAN (Arkhiv Akademii Nauk) f. 359, op. 2, d. 499,1. 2; d. 507,11. 26-27; TsGAORgM f. 168, op. 3, d. 7, 1. 29; Rabochaia Moskva 29 October 1931, 3; TsGAOR f. 5515, op. 15, d. 410,1. 55.

45. See for example, Gudov, Ivan, Sud’ba Rabochego (Moscow: Politizdat, 1974), 5, 35Google Scholar. Another peasant became intrigued when a fellow villager urged him to join construction work on the Moscow metro; after finding out what a metro was, he followed his friend to begin work there; Istorila metro Moskvy, 231.

46. Panfilova, Formirovanie rabochego klassa, 97. Fedorov, V. D., “Formirovanie rabochikh kadrov na novostroikakh pervoi piatiletki” (Ph.D. diss., Gor’kii, 1966), 80 Google Scholar; M.I. Eliseeva, “O sposobakh privlecheniia rabochei sily v promyshlennosť i stroitel’stvo v period sotsialisticheskoi industrilizatsii SSSR (1926-1937),” Izvestiia Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo pedigogicheskogo instituta 63 (1967): 53. TsGAORgM f. 1289, op. 1, d. 91, 11. 107-108; f. 176, op. 6, d. 184, 1. 1. See also Komsomol’skaia Pravda, 20 May 1932, 3.

47. TsGAMO f. 4867, op. 1, d. 156, 11. 24-26; Za novoi byt 1929 no. 9-10, 4; Moskovskaia promyshlennaia kooperatsiia 1931 no. 7, 12.

48. Rabochii klass—vedushchaia, 201.

49. Istorila Moskovskogo avtozavoda imeni I. A. Likhacheva (Moscow: Mysl’, 1966), 171-172; AMOvets 1 April 1931, 1.

50. AMOvets, 1 April 1931, 1; Sputnik kommunista 1930, no. 6, 48; Amostroika, 11 April 1931, 4.

51. htoriia metro Moskvy, 208; Govoriat stroiteli sotsializma. Vospominaniia uchastnikov sotsialisticheskogo stroitel’stva v SSSR (Moscow: Profizdat, 1959), 150; Amostroika, 18 June 1931, 3; Siegelbaum, Lewis H., “Soviet Norm Determination in Theory and Practice, 1917-1941” Soviet Studies 36, no. 1 (January 1984): 52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52. Istorila Moskovskogo avtozavoda, 171-172; S. E. Chaiko, Kak vesti kul’trabotu sredi stroitelei (Moscow: TsK USSR, 1930), 15-16; Khlevniuk, O. V., “Izmenenie kul’turnogo oblika gorodskikh rabochikh SSSR 1926-1939” (diss., Moscow, 1986), 82.Google Scholar

53. Stroitel’naia promyshlennosť 1929 no. 4, 380; Vdovin and Drobizhev, Rost rabochego klassa, 217; Moskovskaia promyshlennaia kooperatisiia 1931, no. 7,12.

54. Platonov, Andrei, “Usomnivshiisia Makar,” Gosudarstvennyi zhitel’. Proza, rannie sochineniia, pis’ma, comp. Platonova, M. A. (Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’, 1988)Google Scholar.