No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Gnathostomes (Jawed Vertebrates)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 July 2017
Extract
All living organisms possess mechanisms for obtaining nutrition. Many invertebrates also possess movable mouthparts capable of capturing prey or particulate food (e.g., polychaetes, cephalopods, arthropods and echinoderms). All living vertebrates have specialized mouthparts, and as far as we know all fossil agnathans had them also, but movable jaws supported by an internal skeleton are absent in living and fossil agnathans.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Short Courses in Paleontology , Volume 7: Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution , 1994 , pp. 38 - 56
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1994 Paleontological Society
References
Agassiz, L.
1833–44. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles. 5 vols. with suppl. Neuchatel.
Google Scholar
Agassiz, L.
1857. Various existing systems of classification of fishes. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 4: 8–9.Google Scholar
Allis, E.P.
1923. The cranial anatomy of Chlamydoselachus anguineus
. Acta Zoologica, 4:123–221.Google Scholar
Ayers, H., and Jackson, C.M.
1900. Morphology of the Myxinoidei. I. Skeleton and musculature. Journal of Morphology, 17: 185–226.Google Scholar
de Beer, G.R.
1931. The development of the vertebrate skull. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
de Beer, G.R., and Moy-Thomas, J.A.
1935. On the skull of Holocephali. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 224: 287–312.Google Scholar
Berg, L.S.
1947. Classification of fishes, both living and fossil. Transactions of the Institute of Zoological Academy of Science USSR, 5: 7–517.Google Scholar
Berg, L.S.
1958. Lower Carboniferous fishes from the Achinsnk's Government. Voprosy Ikhtiologii Akademia Nauk SSSR, 11: 142–153
(in Russian).Google Scholar
Brito, P.
1992. Nouvelles donnees sur I'anatomie et la position systematique de Tribodud
limae Brito and Ferreira, 1989 (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) du Cretace Inferieur de la Chapadado Araripe (N-E Bresil). Geobios, 1992: 143–150.Google Scholar
Compagno, L.J.
1973. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. In
Greenwood, P.H., Miles, R.S., and Patterson, C. (eds.) Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Compagno, L.J.
1977. Phyletic relationships of living sharks and rays. American Zoologist, 17: 303–322.Google Scholar
Cope, E.D.
1889. Synopsis of the families of Vertebrata. American Naturalist, 23: 1–29.Google Scholar
Dean, B.
1906. Chimaeroid fishes and their development. Camegie Institute of Washington Publications, 32: 194 p.Google Scholar
Dean, B.
1909. Studies on fossil fishes (sharks, chimaeroids and arthrodires). American Museum of Natural History, Memoir
9: 209–287.Google Scholar
Denison, R.
1978. Placodermi. In
Schultze, H.P. (ed.) Handbook of paleoichthyology. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dean, B.
1979. Acanthodii. In
Schultze, H.P. (ed.) Handbook of paleoichthyology. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Eastman, C.R.
1899. Descriptions of new species of Diplodus teeth from the Devonian of north-eastem Illinois. Journal of Geology, 7: 489–493.Google Scholar
Forey, P.L. and Janvier, P.
1993. Agnathans and the origin of jawed vertebrates. Nature, 361: 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forey, P.L., Young, V.T., and McClure, H.A.
1992. Lower Devonian fishes from Saudi Arabia. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), 48: 25–43.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A.
1895. Fauna der Gaskohle and der Kalksteine der Perm-formation Bohmens. Vol. 2. Prague.Google Scholar
Gagnier, P.Y., Paris, F., Racheboef, P., Janvier, P., and Suarez- Riglos, M.
1988. Les vertebres Devoniens de Bolivie. Bulletin de I'Institut Francais d'Etudes Andines, 18: 75–93.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B.G.
1984. The relationship of placoderms. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4: 379–395.Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, C.
1872. Untersuchungen zur Vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbelthiere. III. Das Kopfskelet der Selachier. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Goette, A.
1901. Über die Kiemen der Fische. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 69: 532–577.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E.S.
1909. Cyclostomes and fishes. In
Lankester, E.R. (ed.) A Treatise on Zoology: Vertebrata, Craniata. R. and R. Clark, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E.S.
1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goujet, D.
1984. Placoderm interrelationships: a new interpretation, with a short review of placoderm classifications. Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales, 107: 211–243.Google Scholar
Gross, W.
1973. Kleinschuppen, FIossenstachel and Zahne von Fischen aus europaischen and nordamerikanischen Bonebeds des Devons. Palaeontographica A, 83:1–60.Google Scholar
Halstead, L.B.
1982. Evolutionary trends and the phylogeny of the Agnatha. In
Joysey, K.A. and Friday, A.E. (eds.) Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Holmgren, N.
1942. Studies on the head in fishes: Part III. The phylogeny of elasmobranch fishes. Acta Zoologica, 23: 129–261.Google Scholar
Holmgren, N.
1943. Studies on the head in fishes: Part IV. General morphology of the head in fish. Acta Zoologica, 24: 1–188.Google Scholar
Hotton, N. III.
1952. Jaws and teeth of American xenacanth sharks. Journal of Paleontology, 26: 489–500.Google Scholar
Hubbs, C.L., and Potter, I.C.
1971. Distribution, phylogeny and taxonomy. In
Hardisty, M.W. and Potter, I.C. (eds.) The Biology of Lampreys. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hussakof, L., and Bryant, W.L.
1918. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the museums of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences. Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences, Bulletin, 12: 1–346.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O.M.J.
1906. Neue Rekonstruktionen von Pleuracanthus sessilis and von Polyacrodus (Hybodus) hauffianus
. Sitzungberichte der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde, Berlin, 1906: 155–159.Google Scholar
Janvier, P.
1981. The phylogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil “agnathans.”
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,
1: 121–159.Google Scholar
Janvier, P.
1984. The relationships of the Osteostraci and Galeaspida. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4: 344–358.Google Scholar
Janvier, P., and Melo, J.H.G.
1992. New acanthodian and chondrichthyan remains from the Lower and Middle Devonian of Brazil. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie and Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1992: 193–206.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E.
1964. Specialisation in early vertebrates. Annales de la Societe Royale Zoologique de Belgique
94: 11–95.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E.
1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Jollie, M.
1971. Some developmental aspects of the head skeleton of the 35–37mm Squalus
acanthias foetus. Journal of Morphology, 133: 17–40.Google Scholar
Jordan, D.S.
1923. A classification of fishes including families and genera as far as known. Stanford University Publications, University Series, Biological Sciences, 3(2): 77–243.Google Scholar
Karatajute -Talimaa, V.N.
1973.
Elequestolepis grossi gen. et sp. nov., ein neuer der Placoidschuppe aus dem oberen Silur der Tuwa. Palaeontographica, A, 143: 35–50.Google Scholar
Langille, R.M., and Hall, B.K.
1988. Role of the neural crest in development of the trabeculae and branchial arches in embryonic sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus
. Development, 102: 301–310.Google Scholar
Laurent, P., and Dunel-Erb, S.
1984. The pseudobranch: morphology and function. In
Hoar, W.S. and Randall, D.J. (eds.) Fish Physiology, 10 (B). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1977. Structural notes on a cladoselachian dorsal spine. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1977: 47–55.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1980. An evaluation of jaw suspension in sharks. American Museum Novitates, 2706:1–17.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1981. Studies on the Paleozoic selachian genus Ctenacanthus Agassiz. No.1: Historical review and revised diagnosis of the Ctenacanthus, with a list of referred taxa. American Museum Novitates, 2718: 1–22.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1982. The anatomy and relationships of Mesozoic hybodont sharks. American Museum Novitates, 2724: 1–48.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1983. Cranial anatomy of Hybodus basanus Egerton from the Lower Cretaceous of England. American Museum Novitates, 2758: 1–64.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1984a. Chondrichthyan phylogeny: a look at the evidence. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4: 359–371.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1984b. Higher elasmobranch phylogeny and biostratigraphy. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 82: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1988. Phylogeny of early vertebrate skeletal induction and ossification patterns. Evolutionary Biology, 22: 1–36.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1989a. Visceral skeleton and musculature of a late Devonian shark. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 9: 174–190.Google Scholar
Maisey, J.G.
1989b.
Hamiltonichthys mapesii, gen. and sp. nov. (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Kansas. American Museum Novitates, 2931: 1–42.Google Scholar
Mallatt, J.
1984. Early vertebrate evolution: pharyngeal structure and the origin of gnathostomes. Journal of Zoology, 204: 169–183.Google Scholar
Miles, R.S.
1968. Jaw articulation and suspension in Acanthodes and their significance. In
Orvig, T. (ed.) Current Problems in Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Miles, R.S.
1969. Features of placoderm diversification and the evolution of the arthrodire feeding mechanism. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 68: 123–170.Google Scholar
Miles, R.S.
1973. Relationships of acanthodians. In Greenwood, P.H., Miles, R.S., and Patterson, C. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Miles, R.S., and Young, G.C.
1977. Placoderm interrelationships reconsidered in the light of new ptyctodontids from Gogo, Western Australia. In
Andrews, S.M., Miles, R.S. and Walker, A.D. (eds.), Problems in Vertebrate evolution. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Muller, J.
1844. Über den Bau und die Grenzen der Ganoiden und über das naturliche System der Fische. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1844: 117–216.Google Scholar
Nelson, G.
1968. Gill arch structure in Acanthodes. In Orvig, T. (ed.) Current problems in Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Newberry, J.S.
1884. Ctenacanthus wrighti, n. sp. 35th. Annual Report of the New York State Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Patterson, C.
1965. The phylogeny ofthe chimaeroids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 249: 101–219.Google Scholar
Patterson, C.
1982. Morphological characters and homology. In
Joysey, K.A. and Friday, A.E. (eds.) Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B.
1975. Comments on the origin and basic radiation of the gnathostome fishes with particular reference to the feeding mechanism. Colloques Internationaux du Centre National Recherche Scientifique, 218: 101–110.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B.
1981. The xenacanth shark neurocranium, with comments on elasmobranch monophyly. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 169: 3–66.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B., and Thomson, K.S.
1980. Reflections on agnathan-gnathostome relationships. In
Jacobs, L.L. (ed.) Aspects of Vertebrate History: Essays in honor of Edwin Harris Colbert. Museum of Northern Arizona Press, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Schauinsland, H.
1903. Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschicte und Anatomie der Wirbelthiere 1. Zoologica, 16:1–98.Google Scholar
Sewertzoff, A.N.
1931. Morphologische Gesetzmassigkeiten der evolution. Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Shirai, S.
1991. Squalean phylogeny: a new framework of “squaloid” sharks and related genera. Hokkaido University Press, Hokkaido.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E.
1927. The Downtonian and Devonian vertebrates of Spitzbergen. Part 1. Family Cephalaspidae. Skrifter om Svalbard og Ishavet, 12: 1–391.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E.
1937. Notes on the endocranium of a Devonian Cladodus
. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of Uppsala, 27: 128–144.Google Scholar
Stockard, C.R.
1906. The development of the mouth and gills in Bdellostoma stouti
. Anatomische Anzeiger, 5: 481–517.Google Scholar
Thies, D.
1983. Jurazeitliche Neoselachier aus Deutschland und S.-England. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg,
58: 1–117.Google Scholar
Turner, S.
1985. Remarks on the early history of chondrichthyans, thelodonts, and some “higher elasmobranchs.” New Zealand Geological Survey Record 9, Hornibrook Symposium Extended Abstracts,
1985: 93–95.Google Scholar
Turner, S., and Young, G.C.
1987. Shark teeth from the early-middle Devonian Cravens Peak Beds, Georgina Basin, Queensland. Alcheringa, 11: 233–244.Google Scholar
Watson, D.M.S.
1937. The acanthodian fishes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 228: 49–146.Google Scholar
Werner, C.
1989. Die Elasmobranchier- Fauna des Gebel Dist Member der Bahiriya Formation (Obercenoman) der Oase Bahiriya, Agypten. Palaeoichthyologia, 5: 1–112.Google Scholar
Van Wijhe, J.W.
1922. Fruhe Entwicklungsstadien des Kopf- und Rumpfskeletts von Acanthias vulgaris
. Bijdragen tot der Dierkunde, 22: 271–298.Google Scholar
Woodward, A.S.
1932. Fishes to birds. In
Eastman, C.R. (ed.) Textbook of Palaeontology (2nd. ed.), Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Young, G.C.
1982. Devonian sharks from south-eastem Australia and Antarctica. Palaeontology, 25: 817–843.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., and Case, G.R.
1976. Iniopterygia, a new order of chondrichthyan fishes from the Pennsylvanian of North America. Fieldiana, Geology Memoirs, 6: 1–67.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., and Williams, M.E.
1975. New evidence on the nature of the jaw suspension in Paleozoic anacanthous sharks. Palaeontology, 18: 333–341.Google Scholar