Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T18:40:31.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Butler's Theory of Moral Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Roger A. Shiner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is something of a commonplace of Butlerian interpretation that the main interest and achievements of Butler's moral philosophy are in normative ethics, and not metaethics. He wishes to bring moral enlightenment to citizens and not, to philosophers, epistemological enlightenment. Nonetheless for that he makes a number of remarks which, if we were collecting for some bizarre purpose metaethical forms of words, we would note down and include in our collection. Thus he makes some progress towards the development of a moral epistemology, a theory of moral judgment. My purpose here is to assess those steps, and to see how far the structure which results can be called a theory. I have the impression that much of the reluctance among scholars to allow that Butler does have a theory of moral judgment is caused by the metaethical blinkers that they themselves wear; what is in fact the beginnings of an unfashionable and unconventional theory is seen as unsophisticated confusion. But I shall not overdo praise of Butler. I shall suggest that Aristotle does a somewhat better job of developing this type of theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 12 , March 1978 , pp. 199 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Bywater, I. (Oxford U.P., 1890). Intext references use the following abbreviation: NE.Google Scholar
Broad, C.D., Five Types of Ethical Theory (Routledge & Kegan Paul, Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar
Butler, J., Fifteen Sermons and A Dissertation on Virtue, ed. Roberts, T. A. (SPCK, London, 1970). In-text references use the following abbreviations: P. (Preface). S and DV.Google Scholar
Butler, J., The Analogy of Religion (Ungar, New York, 1961).Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, A., Butler's Moral Philosophy (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1952).Google Scholar
Foot, P., ‘Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives’, Phil. Rev., 81 (1972).Google Scholar
Foot, P., ‘Reasons for Action and Desires’, ASSV, 46 (1972).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford U.P., 1961).Google Scholar
Hume, D., Treatise on Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford U.P., 1896). In-text references use the following abbreviation: T.Google Scholar
Hume, D., Inquiry into the Principles of Morals, eds. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford U.P., 1975).Google Scholar
Hunter, J. F. M., ‘Conscience’, Mind, 72 (1963), pp. 309–34.Google Scholar
Kleinig, J., ‘Butler in a Cool Hour’, Jnl. of History of Phil., 7 (1969), pp. 399–411.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, D. M., A Study in Ethical Theory (A. & C. Black, London, 1957).Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D., ‘Bishop Butler's View of Conscience’, Philosophy, 24 (1949), pp. 219–38.Google Scholar
Ryle, G., ‘Conscience and Moral Convictions’, reprinted in Philosophy and Analysis, ed. Macdonald, M. (Blackwell, Oxford, 1954), pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L., Ethics and Language (Yale U.P., New Haven, 1944).Google Scholar
Sturgeon, N. L., ‘Nature and Conscience in Butler's Ethics’, Phil. Rev., 85 (1976), pp. 315–56.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E., ‘Some Features of Butler's Ethics’, reprinted in his Philosophical Studies (Macmillan, London, 1934), pp. 291–328.Google Scholar
White, A. R., ‘Conscience and Self Love in Butler's Sermons’, Philosophy, 27 (1952), pp. 329–44.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, 2nd edition (Blackwells, Oxford, 1958).Google Scholar