Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:45:51.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Anthropocentrism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2011

Robin Attfield
Robin Attfield
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After the first wave of writings in environmental philosophy in the early 1970s, which were mostly critical of anthropocentrism, a new trend emerged which sought to humanise this subject, and to revive or vindicate anthropocentric stances. Only in this way, it was held, could environmental values become human values, and ecological movements manage to become social ecology. Later writers have detected tacit anthropocentrism lurking even in Deep Ecology, or have defended ‘perspectival anthropocentrism’, as the inevitable methodology of any system of environmental ethics devised by and for the guidance of human beings. Human good, broadly enough conceptualised, is held to be the basis of ethics. Besides, it is sometimes added, non-anthropocentric considerations in any case add nothing to anthropocentric ones, when broadly construed.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 69 , October 2011 , pp. 29 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Routley, Richard (later Sylvan), ‘Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental, Ethic?’, Proceedings of the World Congress of Philosophy (Varna, Bulgaria: World Congress of Philosophy, 1973), 205–210Google Scholar. The earliest paper of Rolston, Holmes III was his ‘Is There an Ecological Ethic’, Ethics, 85 (1975), 93–109Google Scholar. The earliest relevant paper of Naess, Arne was his ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-range Ecology Movement: A Summary’, Inquiry, 16 (1973), 95–100Google Scholar.

2 Passmore, John, Man's Responsibility for Nature (London: Duckworth, 1974).Google Scholar

3 Norton, Bryan, ‘Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism’, Environmental Ethics, 6 (1984), 131–148Google Scholar; Norton, Bryan, ‘Why I am Not a Non-Anthropocentrist: Callicott and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism’, Environmental Ethics, 17 (1995), 341–358.Google Scholar

4 Thompson, Janna, ‘A Refutation of Environmental Ethics’, Environmental Ethics, 12 (1990), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Goodpaster, Kenneth E., ‘On Being Morally Considerable’, Journal of Philosophy, 75 (1978), 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Carruthers, Peter, The Animals Issue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Frey, R.G., Rights, Killing and Suffering: Moral Vegetarianism and Applied Ethics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar

8 Leahy, Michael P.T., Against Liberation: Putting Animals in Perspective (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

9 Hargrove, Eugene C., Foundations of Environmental Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989).Google Scholar

10 Sagoff, Mark, The Economy of the Earth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

11 Callicott, J. Baird, ‘Rolston on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction’, Environmental Ethics, 14 (1992), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Benson, John, Environmental Ethics: An Introduction with Readings (London and New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

13 O'Neill, John, Ecology, Policy and Politics (London: Routledge, 1993), 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 O'Neill, John, Holland, Alan and Light, Andrew, Environmental Values (London and New York: Routledge, 2008), 120–121.Google Scholar

15 O'Neill, Ecology, Policy and Politics, 24.

16 Ibid., 24–25.

17 Ibid., 81.

18 Ibid., 161.

19 Attfield, Robin, A Theory of Value and Obligation (London, New York and Sydney: Croom Helm, 1987)Google Scholar, chs 3 and 4; Value, Obligation and Meta-Ethics (Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Éditions Rodopi, 1995)Google Scholar, chs 4 and 5.

20 Attfield, Value, Obligation and Meta-Ethics, 45–62.

21 O'Neill, op. cit., note 13, 24; O'Neill, Holland and Light, op. cit., note 14, 120–121.

22 Norton, Bryan, Towards Unity among Environmentalists (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

23 Partridge, Ernest, ‘Why Care about the Future?’, in Partridge (ed.), Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics (Buffalo: Prometheus, 1981), 203–220Google Scholar.

24 O'Neill, op. cit., note 13, 149–151.

25 Scherer, Donald, ‘Anthropocentrism, Atomism and Environmental Ethics’, in Scherer, Donald and Attig, Thomas (eds), Ethics and the Environment (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983), 73–81.Google Scholar

26 Ferré, Frederick, ‘Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?’, in Attfield, Robin and Belsey, Andrew (eds), Philosophy and the Natural Environment (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 72.

27 Katz, Eric, ‘Against the Inevitability of Anthropocentrism’, in Katz, Eric, Light, Andrew and Rothenburg, David (eds), Beneath the Surface: Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Deep Ecology (Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 2000), 17–42.Google Scholar

28 Katz, Eric and Oechsli, Lauren, ‘Moving Beyond Anthropocentrism: Environmental Ethics, Development and the Amazon’, Environmental Ethics, 15 (1993), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 O'Neill, Holland and Light, op. cit., note 14, 179–182.

30 Katz and Oechsli, op. cit., note 28, 58–59.

31 O'Neill, Holland and Light, op. cit., note 14, 179–180.

32 See Attfield, Robin, The Ethics of Environmental Concern (Oxford: Blackwell and New York: Columbia University Press, 1983)Google Scholar, chs 2 and 3.

33 Bernard Williams, ‘Must a Concern for the Environment Be Centred on Human Beings?’ in Bernard Williams, Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers, 1982–1993 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 233–240, at 234.

34 Wiggins, David, ‘Nature, Respect for Nature, and the Human Scale of Values’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, C (2000), 1–32Google Scholar, at 8.

35 Ibid., 10; cf. 18.