Skip to main content Accessibility help

Survey and comparative study of free simulation software for mobile robots

  • M. Torres-Torriti (a1), T. Arredondo (a2) and P. Castillo-Pizarro (a2)


In robotics, simulation has become an essential tool for research, education, and design purposes. Various software tools for mobile robot simulation have been developed and have reached different levels of maturity in recent years. This paper presents a general survey of mobile robot simulation tools and discusses qualitative and quantitative aspects of selection of four major simulators publicly available at no cost: Carmen, Player-Stage-Gazebo, Open Dynamics Engine, and Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio. The comparison of the simulators is aimed at establishing the range of applications for which these are best suited as well as their accuracy for certain simulation tasks. The simulators chosen for detailed comparison were selected considering their level of maturity, modularity, and popularity among engineers and researchers. The qualitative comparison included a discussion of relevant features. The quantitative analysis entailed the development of a detailed dynamical model of a mobile robot on a road with varying slope. This model was used as benchmark to compare the accuracy of each simulator. The validity of the simulated results was also contrasted against measurements obtained from experiments with a real robot. This research and analysis should be very valuable to educators, engineers, and researchers who are always seeking adequate tools for simulating autonomous mobile robots.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
1.Anitescu, M. and Potra, F. A., “Formulating dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with friction as solvable linear complementarity problems,” Nonlinear Dyn. 14, 231247 (1997).
2.Baraff, D., “Linear-Time Dynamics Using Lagrange Multipliers,” Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '96), New Orleans, LA, USA (Aug. 4–9, 1996) pp. 137–146.
3.Carpin, S., Lewis, M., Wang, J., Balakirsky, S. and Scrapper, C., “USARSim: A Robot Simulator for Research and Education,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2007, Roma, Italy (Apr. 10–14, 2007) pp. 1400–1405.
4.Castillo-Pizarro, P., Arredondo-Vidal, T. and Torres-Torriti, M., “Introductory Survey to Open-Source Mobile Robot Simulation Software,” Proceedings of the 2010 Latin American Robotics Symposium and Intelligent Robotic Meeting (LARS), Sao Bernardo do Campo, Brazil (Oct. 2010) pp. 150–155.
5.Chatterjee, A. and Ruina, A., “A new algebraic rigid-body collision law based on impulse space considerations,” J. Appl. Mech. 65 (4), 939951 (1998).
6.Chiang, L. E., “Teaching robotics with a reconfigurable 3D multibody dynamics simulator,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 18 (1), 108116 (2010).
7.Cohen, J. D., Lin, M. C., Manocha, D. and Ponamgi, M., “I-COLLIDE: Qn Interactive and Exact Collision Detection System for Large-Scale Environments,” Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D '95), Monterey, CA, USA (Apr. 9–12, 1995) pp. 189–196.
8.Corke, P. I., “A robotics toolbox for MATLAB,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 3 (1), 2432 (Mar. 1996).
9.Daza, I. G., Pascual, L. M. B., Vazquez, M. A. S., Guillen, E. L., Navarro, R. B. and Vazquez, L. B., “Low Level Control in States Space for the Pioneer,” In: Proceedings of the the 2005 International Conference on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON 2005), Vol. 1, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro (Nov. 21–24, 2005) pp. 322–325. IEEE, New Jersey, USA. Jalón, J. García and Bayo, E., Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1994).
11.Delp, S. L., Anderson, F. C., Arnold, A. S., Loan, P., Habib, A., John, C. T., Guendelman, E. and Thelen, D. G., “Opensim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 (11), 19401950 (Nov. 2007).
12.Diankov, R. and Kuffner, J., “Openrave: A Planning Architecture for Autonomous Robotics,” Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-08-34, Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (Jul. 2008).
13.Drumwright, E., Hsu, J., Koenig, N. and Shell, D., “Extending Open Dynamics Engine for Robotics Simulation,” In: Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6472 (Ando, N., Balakirsky, S., Hemker, T., Reggiani, M. and von Stryk, O., eds.) (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010) pp. 3850.
14.Eberly, D. H., Game Physics. (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive 3D Technology), 2nd ed. (Elsevier, New York, NY, Apr. 2010).
15.Elkady, A. and Sobh, T., “Robotics middleware: A comprehensive literature survey and attribute-based bibliography,” J. Robot. 2012, 15 (2012), Article ID 959013.
16.Erleben, K., “Module-Based Design for Rigid Body Simulators,” Technical Report DIKU 02/06, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (2002).
17.Eroglu, M., “Computer simulation of robot dynamics,” Robotica 16 (6), 615621 (1998).
18.Featherstone, R., Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms (Springer, New York, NY, 2008).
19.Folgado, E., Rincón, M., Álvarez, J. R. and Mira, J., “A Multi-Robot Surveillance System Simulated in Gazebo,” In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Work-conference on Nature-Inspired Problem-Solving Methods in Knowledge Engineering: Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation, Part II IWINAC '07) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2007) pp. 202–211.
20.Gerkey, B. P., Vaughan, R. T. and Howard, A., “The Player/Stage Project: Tools for Multi-Robot and Distributed Sensor Systems,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Coimbra, Portugal (Jun. 30–Jul. 3, 2003) pp. 317–323.
21.Harris, A. and Conrad, J. M., “Survey of Popular Robotics Simulators, Frameworks, and Toolkits,” Proceedings of IEEE SoutheastCon, 2011, Nashville, TN, USA (Mar. 17–20, 2011) pp. 243–249.
22.Huag, E. J., Computer-Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems: Basic Methods, Allyn and Bacon Series in Engineering (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989).
23.Hugues, L. and Bredeche, N., “Simbad: An Autonomous Robot Simulation Package for Education and Research,” In: SAB, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4095 (Nolfi, S., Baldassarre, G., Calabretta, R., Hallam, J. C. T., Marocco, D., Meyer, J.-A., Miglino, O. and Parisi, D., eds.) (Springer, New York, NY, 2006) pp. 831842.
24.Jazar, R. N., Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application (Springer, New York, NY, 2008).
25.Johns, K. and Taylor, T., Professional Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio (Wrox, Indianapolis, IN, 2008).
26.Klein, J., “Breve: A 3D Environment for the Simulation of Decentralized Systems and Artificial Life,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002), pp. 329–334.
27.Kobayashi, K., Uchida, Y. and Watanabe, K., “A Study of Battle Strategy for the Robocode,” In: Proceedings of the SICE 2003 Annual Conference, Vol. 3, Fukui, Japan (Aug. 4–6, 2003) pp. 3373–3376. IEEE, New Jersey, USA.
28.Kovačić, Z., Bogdan, S., Petrinec, K., Reichenbach, T. and Punčec, M., “Leonardo – The Off-line Programming Tool for Robotized Plants,” Proceedings of the 9th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Jun. 27–29, Dubrovnik, Croatia (Jun. 2001).
29.Kumar, K. and Singh, P. Reel, “Analysis of Contemporary Robotics Simulators,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical and Computer Technology (ICETECT), 2011, Tamil Nadu, India (Mar. 23–24, 2011) pp. 661–665.
30.Magyar, B., Forhecz, Z. and Korondi, P., “Developing an Efficient Mobile Robot Control Algorithm in the Webots Simulation Environment,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2003, Vol. 1, Maribor, Slovenia (Dec. 10–12, 2003) pp. 179–184.
31.Marhefka, D. W. and Orin, D. E., “Xanimate: An educational tool for robot graphical simulation,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 3 (2), 614 (Jun. 1996).
32.Marhefka, D. W. and Orin, D. E., “A compliant contact model with nonlinear damping for simulation of robotic systems,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 29 (6), 566572 (Nov. 1999).
33.McMillan, S., Orin, D. E. and McGhee, R. B., “Object-oriented Design of a Dynamic Simulation for Underwater Robotic Vehicles,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995, Vol. 2, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan (May 21–27, 1995) pp. 1886–1893.
34.Miller, A. T. and Allen, P. K., GraspIt! A versatile simulator for robotic grasping. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 11 (4), 110122 (Dec. 2004).
35.Mirtich, B. V., Impulse-Based Dynamic Simulation of Rigid Body Systems Ph.D. Thesis (University of California, Berkeley, CA, Dec. 1996).
36.Murray, R. M., Sastry, S. S. and Zexiang, L., A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, 1st ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994).
37.Nethery, J. F. and Spong, M. W., “Robotica: A Mathematica package for robot analysis,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 1 (1), 1320 (Mar. 1994).
38.Rahim, A., Teo, J. and Saudi, A., “An Empirical Comparison of Code Size Limit in Auto-Constructive Artificial Life,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 2006, Bangkok, Thailand (Jun. 7–9, 2006) pp. 1–6.
39.Reichenbach, T., “A dynamic simulator for humanoid robots,” Artif. Life Robot. 13, 561565 (2009).
40.Rodenbaugh, S. J. and Orin, D. E., “Robotbuilder User's Guide, ver. 1.0.,” Technical Report, Department of Electrical Engineering (The Ohio State University, Ohio, May 2003).
41.Rohmer, E., Singh, S. P. N. and Freese, M., “V-REP: A Versatile and Scalable Robot Simulation Framework,” Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan, November 3–7, 2013 (Nov. 2013) pp. 1321–1326.
42.Ros, J., Yoldi, R., Plaza, A. and Iriarte, X., “Real-time Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation of a Hexaglide-Type Parallel Manipulator on a Real Machine Controller,” In: ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics 2011 (Samin, J. C. and Fisette, P., eds.), Brussels, Belgium (European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences (ECCOMAS), 2011) pp. 1–11.
43.Rusu, R. B., Holzbach, A., Diankov, R., Bradski, G. and Beetz, M., “Perception for Mobile Manipulation and Grasping Using Active Stereo,” Proceedings of the 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2009, Paris, France (Dec. 7–9, 2009) pp. 632–638.
44.Son, W., Kim, K., Amato, N. M. and Trinkle, J. C., “A Generalized Framework for Interactive Dynamic Simulation for Multirigid Bodies,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 34 (2), 912924 (Apr. 2004).
45.Stewart, D. and Trinkle, J. C., “An Implicit Time-Stepping Scheme for Rigid Body Dynamics with Coulomb Friction,” In: Proceedings of the ICRA IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2000, Vol. 1, San Francisco, CA, USA (Apr. 24–28, 2000) pp. 162–169. IEEE, New Jersey, USA.
46.Stewart, D. E., “Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact,” SIAM Rev. 42 (1), 339 (2000).
47.Tang, M., Manocha, D., Lin, J. and Tong, R., “Collision-streams: Fast GPU-based Collision Detection for Deformable Models,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games (I3D '11), San Francisco, CA, USA (Feb. 18–20, 2011) pp. 63–70.
48.Vaughan, R. T. and Gerkey, B. P., “Really Reusable Robot Code and the Player/Stage Project,” In: Software Engineering for Experimental Robotics, Berlin, Germany (2006) pp. 267289. Springer-Verlag.
49.Walker, M. W. and Orin, D. E., “Efficient dynamic computer simulation of robotic mechanisms,” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 104 (3), 205211 (1982).
50.Wang, J., Gosselin, C. M. and Cheng, L., “Modeling and simulation of robotic systems with closed kinematic chains using the virtual spring approach,” Multibody Syst. Dyn. 7, 145170 (2002).
51.Wong, J. Y., Theory of Ground Vehicles, 4th ed. (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2008).
52.Yamane, K. and Nakamura, Y., “Stable Penalty-Based Model of Frictional Contacts,” Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2006), Orlando, FL, USA (May 15–19, 2006) pp. 1904–1909.
53.Ylikorpi, T., Peralta, J.-L. and Halme, A., “Comparing passive walker simulators in MATLAB and ADAMS,” J. Struct. Mech. 44 (1), 6592 (2011).
54.Zagal, J. C., Ruiz-Del-Solar, J. and Vallejos, P., “Back to Reality: Crossing the Reality Gap in Evolutionary Robotics,” Proceedings of the 5th IFAC Symposium on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, Lisbon, Portugal (Jul. 5–7, 2004) pp. 1–9.
55.Zhen, Z., Qixin, C., Lo, C. and Lei, Z., “A CORBA-based simulation and control framework for mobile robots,” Robotica 27 (3), 459468 (2009).
56.Žlajpah, L., “Simulation in robotics,” Math. Comput. Simul. 79 (4), 879897 (2008).
57.anyKode Marilou. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
58.Carmen: Carnegie Mellon Robot Navigation Toolkit. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
59.Cogmation robotics. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
60.Energid. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
61.EyerSim. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
62.Torers-Torriti, M., Arredondo, T. and Castillo-Pizarro, P., Installation instructions for Carmen, Gazebo and Open Dynamics Engine. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
63.JDE project. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
64.Moby. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
65.ODE: Open Dynamics Engine. Available at:, (accessed July 2, 2014).
66.OpenRAVE. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
67.OpenRDK. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
68.OpenSim. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
69.The Orocos Project. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
70.PSG: Player-Stage-Gazebo. Available at:, (accessed July 2, 2014).
71.Robocode. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
72.ROS. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
73.Simbad. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
74.USARSim. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
75.V-REP. Available at: (accessed July 2, 2014).
76.Metta, G., Fitzpatrick, P. and Natal, L., YARP: Yet another robot platform. (accessed July 2, 2014).


Survey and comparative study of free simulation software for mobile robots

  • M. Torres-Torriti (a1), T. Arredondo (a2) and P. Castillo-Pizarro (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed