Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-xbbwl Total loading time: 0.404 Render date: 2021-02-25T09:58:29.517Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2013

FAUSTO BARBERO
Affiliation:
Università di Torino
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

We analyze the behaviour of declarations of independence between existential quantifiers in quantifier prefixes of Independence-Friendly (IF) sentences; we give a syntactical criterion to decide whether a sentence beginning with such prefix exists, such that its truth values may be affected by removal of the declaration of independence. We extend the result also to equilibrium semantics values for undetermined IF sentences.

The main theorem defines a schema of sound and recursive inference rules; we show more explicitly what happens for some simple special classes of sentences.

In the last section, we extend the main result beyond the scope of prenex sentences, in order to give a proof of the fact that the fragment of IF sentences with knowledge memory has only first-order expressive power.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Caicedo, X., Dechesne, F., & Janssen, T. M. V. (2009). Equivalence and quantifier rules for logic with imperfect information. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 17, 91129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galliani, P. (2008a). Game values and equilibria for undetermined sentences of Dependence Logic. M.Sc. Thesis, Published in ILLC MoL Series, MoL-2008-08.
Galliani, P. (2008b). Probabilistic Dependence Logic. http://www.illc.uva.nl/Research/Reports/PP-2008-55.text.pdf.
Hintikka, J. (1996). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J., & Sandu, G. (1989). Informational independence as a semantical phenomenon. In Fenstad, J. E., et al. ., editors. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VIII, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 571589.Google Scholar
Hodges, W. (1997a). Compositional semantics for a language of imperfect information. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 5(4), 539563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, W. (1997b). Some strange quantifiers. In Mycielski, J., Rozenberg, G., and Salomaa, A., editors. Structures in Logic and Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1261, 5165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyttinen, T., & Tulenheimo, T. (2005). Decidability of IF modal logic of perfect recall. In Schmidt, R., et al. ., editors.) Advances in Modal Logic, London, UK: Kings College London Publications, 5, 111131.Google Scholar
Janssen, T. M. V. (2002). Independent choices and the interpretation of IF logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 11(3), 367387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, T. M. V. (2005). Independence friendly logic as a strategic game. Proceedings Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 125130.Google Scholar
Mann, A. L., Sandu, G., & Sevenster, M. (2011). Independence-friendly logic: A game-theoretic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandu, G. (1993). On the logic of informational independence and its applications. Journal of Philosophical Logic Volume, 22(1), 2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, V. (2009). Dependence logic: Investigations into higher-order semantics defined on teams. PhD thesis, Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Mathematics and Statistics.
Sevenster, M. (2006). Branches of imperfect information: Games, logic, and computation. PhD thesis, ILLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Sevenster, M. (2007). A strategic perspective on IF games. http://www.illc.uva.nl/Research/Reports/PP-2007-29.text.pdf.
Sevenster, M., & Sandu, G. (2010). Nash equilibrium semantics. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 161(5), 618631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulenheimo, T. (2004). Independence-Friendly Modal Logic. Studies in its Expressive Power and Theoretical Relevance, Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 4 (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Väänänen, J. (2007). Dependence Logic: A New Approach to Independence Friendly Logic. London Mathematical Society Student Texts (No. 70), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *