Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:20:51.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Realism vs cosmopolitanism A DEBATE BETWEEN BARRY BUZAN AND DAVID HELD, CONDUCTED BY ANTHONY McGREW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1998

Abstract

A.Mc. A common preoccupation of much contemporary writing about world politics concerns the dynamic interrelation between continuity and change. The end of the Cold War, the intensification of globalization and the 'postmodern turn' have delivered powerful challenges to the orthodoxy of realism. Among the most significant of these challenges is the cosmopolitan approach advocated by David Held, Andrew Linklater and others. In contradistinction to realism, which assumes a strict analytical separation between politics within and amongst states, the cosmopolitan approach proffers a more unified conception of political life. In this discussion Barry Buzan, a prominent advocate of realism, and David Held debate the merits of their respective positions and assess the strengths and limits of both realism and cosmopolitanism as frameworks for understanding contemporary global politics and its potential for transformation. I began by asking Barry to explain the fundamentals of contemporary realism. What are its constituent elements?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This discussion was recorded in December 1996 by the BBC for the Open University course, D316, Democracy: From Classical Times to the Present. It has been adapted and extended for publication.