Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2021
A growing body of scholarship connects the participation of women and the inclusion of gender provisions to the sustainability of peace settlements. But how do women's groups navigate gender power structures and gendered forms of violence within complex and fragile political bargaining processes aimed at ending large-scale conflict? The 2016 Colombian peace agreement, internationally applauded for its inclusion of strong gender provisions and women's participation as negotiators and peace advocates, is a significant case for examining these questions. Drawing on original case material, including interviews of key actors on different sides of the conflict – this article analyses the political bargaining dynamics within and among women's movements, the Santos government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, FARC). We argue that the inclusion of women was pivotal in transforming the elite bargaining process and power structures of Colombian society enabling a gender-based approach to the substantive peace agenda addressing transitional gender justice for sexual violence survivors and gender-equal redistribution through land and rural reform programmes. The study suggests that deeply situated political bargaining analysis is essential to navigating gender in elite bargains rather than a one-size-fits-all approach to inclusive peace.
1 Cheng, Christine, Goodhand, Jonathan, and Meehan, Patrick, ‘Synthesis paper: Securing and sustaining elite bargains that reduce violent conflict’, Elite Bargains and Political Deals (London: UK Stabilisation Unit, April 2018), p. 11Google Scholar
2 James Putzel and Jonathan Di John, ‘Meeting the Challenges of Crisis States’, Crisis States Research Centre report (London: The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2012).
3 See Cheng, Goodhand, and Meehan, ‘Synthesis paper’; Putzel and Di John, ‘Meeting the Challenges of Crisis States’; Lindemann, Stefan, ‘Inclusive elite bargains and the dilemma of unproductive peace: A Zambian case study’, Third World Quarterly, 32:1010 (2011), pp. 1843–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Cheng, Goodhand, and Meehan, ‘Synthesis paper’, p. 38.
5 See Aggestam, Karin and Svensson, Isak, ‘Where are the women in peace mediation?’, in Aggestam, Karin and Towns, Ann (eds), Gendering Diplomacy and International Negotiation (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018), pp. 149–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 O'Reilly, Marie, Súilleabháin, Andrea Ó, and Paffenholz, Thania, Reimagining Peacemaking: Women's Roles in Peace Processes (Washington, DC: International Peace Institute 2015), p. 1Google Scholar.
7 Krause, Jana, Krause, Werner, and Bränfors, Piia, ‘Women's participation in peace negotiations and the durability of peace’, International Interactions, 44:6 (2018), pp. 985–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 True, Jacqui and Rivero-Morales, Yolanda, ‘Towards inclusive peace: Analysing gender-sensitive peace agreements 2000–2016’, International Political Science Review, 40:1 (2019), pp. 23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 True and Rivero-Morales, ‘Towards inclusive peace’. A similar finding was observed in Krause, Krause, and Bränfors, ‘Women's participation in peace’.
10 True and Rivero-Morales, ‘Towards inclusive peace’.
11 See UN Women, ‘Take Five: A Successful Peace Process Simply Demands the Active and Meaningful Participation of Women At All Levels’ (30 October 2018), available at: {https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2018/10/take-five-jean-arnault-on-peace-processes}.
12 See Kroc Institute, Special Report of the Kroc Institute and the International Accompaniment Component, UN Women, Women's International Democratic Federation, and Sweden, on the Monitoring of the Gender Perspective in the Implementation of the Colombian Final Peace Accord (2018), available at: {https://kroc.nd.edu/assets/297624/181113_gender_report_final.pdf}.
13 See UN Women, ‘Take Five’, p. 5.
14 The ‘Toward Inclusive Peace' hosted by Monash Gender, Peace and Security Centre (Monash GPS) project dataset included five main types of gender provisions related to: (1) The participation of women the participation of women (that is, gender quotas, national women's machineries, in governmental bodies and postconflict governance); (2) Postconflict issues and transitional justice (accountability, consideration of the special needs of women during repatriation, rehabilitation, reintegration); (3) Violence against women (for example, sexual violence as a violation of ceasefire); (4) Women's economic empowerment and development (that is, land and inheritance rights, women's roles in implementation, education, capacity-building, special attention to female heads of households); and lastly, (5) Any reference to international women-specific legal or human rights mechanisms (such as Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW or UNSCR 1325). The dataset is available at: {https://monash.figshare.com/articles/Toward_Inclusive_Peace_Mapping_Gender_Provisions_of_Peace_Agreements/6948869}; see also True and Riveros-Morales, ‘Towards inclusive peace’.
15 See True and Riveros-Morales, ‘Towards inclusive peace’.
16 See the Monash GPS, ‘Towards Inclusive Peace’ dataset.
17 See Cockburn, Cynthia, The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict (London, UK: Zed Books, 1998)Google Scholar and Tripp, Aili Mari, Women and Power in Post-Conflict Africa (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar for other empirical examples of women's organising in Yugoslavia, Northern Ireland, and Africa, where ethnic and class divisions were overcome to promote peace.
18 See Phelan, Alexandra, ‘Engaging insurgency: The impact of the 2016 Colombian peace agreement on FARC's political participation’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42:9 (2019), pp. 836–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 See Htun, Mala and Weldon, Laurel S., ‘The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005’, American Political Science Review, 106:3 (2012), pp. 548–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 The dataset is available at: {https://monash.figshare.com/articles/Toward_Inclusive_Peace_Mapping_Gender_Provisions_of_Peace_Agreements/6948869}.
21 Edward Laws, ‘Political Settlements, Elite Pacts, and Governments of National Unity: A Conceptual Study’, DLP Background Paper, No. 10 (2012), p. 2.
22 Cheng, Goodhand, and Meehan, ‘Synthesis paper’, p. 11.
23 ‘Substantive representation’ can be understood as the representation of women's political interests and gendered perspectives forged through a process of organising around a common agenda. See Phillips, Anne, The Politics of Presence (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar.
24 Jacqui True, ‘Gender and Conflict: Making Elite Bargaining Processes More Inclusive’, Stabilisation Unit, Her Majesty's Government of The United Kingdom (2020), available at: {https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gender-and-conflict-making-elite-bargaining-processes-more-inclusive}.
25 Putzel and Di John, ‘Meeting the Challenges of Crisis States’; Lindemann, ‘Inclusive elite bargains’.
26 Andreas Schädel and Véronique Dudouet, ‘Incremental Inclusivity: A Recipe for Effective Peace Processes?’ (Berghof Foundation, 2020), p. 20, available at: {https://www.cinep.org.co/Home2/images/2020Noticias/Incremental%20inclusivity%20-%20A%20recipe%20for%20effective%20peace%20processes.pdf}.
27 See Cheng, Goodhand, and Meehan, ‘Synthesis paper’.
28 Ibid., p. 38.
29 Ibid., p. 24.
30 Kew, Darren and John, Anthony Wanis-St, ‘Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion’, International Negotiation, 13:1 (2008), pp. 11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
31 See Schädel and Dudouet, ‘Incremental Inclusivity’.
32 Ibid., p. 7.
33 Ibid.
34 Krause, Krause, and Bränfors, ‘Women's participation in peace negotiations’, p. 989.
35 Ibid., p. 990.
36 See Anderson, Miriam J., Windows of Opportunity: How Women Seize Peace Negotiations for Political Change (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar.
37 Faiza Jama, ‘Whose peace is it anyway? Connecting Somali and international peacemaking’, Conciliation Resources, Accord Issue 11 (2010), available at: {https://www.c-r.org/accord/somalia/somali-women-and-peacebuilding}.
38 Thania Paffenholz, Nicholas Ross, Steven Dixon, Anna-Lena Schluchter, and Jacqui True, Making Women Count – Not Just Counting Women: Assessing Women's Inclusion and Influence on Peace Negotiations (Geneva: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative and UN Women, 2016), pp. 6–7.
39 Ibid., p. 7.
40 See Anderson, Windows of Opportunity.
41 See Bell, Christine, ‘Women, peace negotiations, and peace agreements’, in The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Conflict (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 417Google Scholar; Tripp, Aili Mari, ‘Women's organizations and peace initiatives’, in The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Conflict; and Nilsson, Desirée, ‘Anchoring the peace: Civil society actors in peace accords and durable peace’, International Interactions, 38:2 (2012), pp. 243–66Google Scholar.
42 See, for example, True and Rivero-Morales, ‘Towards inclusive peace’; Tripp, Women and Power in Post-Conflict Africa; and Hughes, Melanie M. and Tripp, Aili Mari, ‘Civil war and trajectories of change in women's political representation in Africa, 1985–2010’, Social Forces, 93:4 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 See, for example, True and Rivero-Morales, ‘Towards inclusive peace’; Walsh, Denise M., Women's Rights in Democratizing States: Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Htun, Mala and Weldon, S. Laurel, The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women's Rights around the World (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Ellerby, Kara, ‘A seat at the table is not enough: Understanding women's substantive representation in peace processes’, Peacebuilding, 4:2 (2016), pp. 136–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
45 Anderson, Windows of Opportunity.
46 See Krause, Krause, and Bränfors, ‘Women's participation in peace negotiations’, p. 1003.
47 Ibid.
48 ABColombia, ‘Towards Transformative Change: Women and the Implementation of the Colombian Peace Accord’ (2019), p. 1, emphasis added.
49 Darden, Jessica Trisko, Henshaw, Alexis, and Szekely, Ora, Insurgent Women: Female Combatants in Civil Wars (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019), p. 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 Céspedes-Báez, Lina M. and Ruiz, Felipe Jaramillo, ‘“Peace without women does not go!” Women's struggle for inclusion in Colombia's peace process with the FARC’, Colombia Internacional, 94 (2018), p. 93Google Scholar.
51 Ibid.
52 Virginia Bouvier, ‘Gender and the Role of Women in Colombia's Peace Process’, UN Women Background Paper (Washington, DC, 2016), p. 19.
53 Authors’ interview with Casa de la Mujer representative, Bogotá, 2017.
54 Authors’ interview with Bienstar Familiar representative, Bogotá, 2017.
55 La República, ‘Se adopta nueva política pública acerca de la igualdad de género’ (17 September 2013), available at: {https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/actualidad/se-adopta-nueva-politica-publica-acerca-de-la-igualdad-de-genero-2061586}.
56 Buitrago, Mónica Pachón and Aroca, María Paula, ‘Effects of institutional reforms on women's representation in Colombia, 1960–2014’, Latin American Politics and Society, 59:2 (2017), pp. 103–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
57 Céspedes-Báez and Ruiz, ‘“Peace without women does not go!”’, p. 85.
58 These forums were facilitated by the United Nations System in Colombia and the National University's Centre for Reflection and Monitoring the Peace Talks, and women participated in working groups throughout nine Colombian regions that were organised by the Peace Commissions of the House and Senate, with the support of the United Nations System. See Bouvier, ‘Gender and the Role of Women’, p. 20
59 Authors’ interview with former Colombian rapporteur, Oslo, 2017.
60 Liliana Zambrano and Felipe Gómez Isa, ‘Participation of Civil Society in the Colombian Peace Process’, Norwegian Peacebuilding Research Centre (2013), p. 4.
61 Ibid.
62 See ONU Mujeres, Oficina del Alto Comisionado para la Paz, FIP, Suecia, ‘Participación de las organizaciones de mujeres que realizaron aportes en el marco del proceso de paz con las FARC’ (2017), available at: {https://colombia.unwomen.org/es/biblioteca/publicaciones/2017/05/cuadernillo-mujeres-fip}.
63 This consisted of representatives from 132 feminist organisations, 43 national and territorial peace initiatives, 38 local experiences of women in peace construction, 33 peasant organisations, 36 victims organisations, 25 Afro-Colombian organisations, 18 student organisations, 21 indigenous organisations, 14 departmental, municipal and advisory councils, 14 human rights organisations, 7 community grassroots organisations, 6 environmental organisations, 6 LGBTI organisations, 6 churches, 6 educational and cultural organisations, 6 political parties, 6 academic sector, 7 universities and research centres, 6 union organisations, and 4 media and communications. See Cumbre Nacional de Mujeres y Paz, Sistematización, 23–5 October 2013, Bogotá (National Summit of Women and Peace, 2014), p. 18.
64 Authors’ interview with UN Women in Colombia representative, Bogotá, 2017.
65 Authors’ interview with Ruta Pacífica representative, Bogotá, 2017.
66 Cumbre Nacional de Mujeres y Paz, Sistematización, 23–5 October 2013, Bogotá (National Summit of Women for Peace, 2014), p. 17.
67 See Cumbre Nacional de Mujeres y Paz, Sistematización (National Summit of Women for Peace).
68 Authors’ interview with former government negotiator, Bogotá, 2017.
69 Bouvier, ‘Gender and the Role of Women’, p. 20.
70 See Céspedes-Báez and Ruiz, ‘“Peace without women does not go!”’.
71 Cheng, Goodhand, and Meehan, ‘Synthesis paper’, p. 3.
72 Ibid.
73 Ibid., p. 30.
74 See Phelan, ‘Engaging insurgency’ and Alexandra Phelan, ‘FARC's pursuit of “taking power”: Insurgent social contracts, the drug trade and appeals to Eudaemonic legitimation’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (2019), pp. 1–23.
76 See Jennifer Thomson, ‘The women, peace, and security agenda and feminist institutionalism: A research agenda’, International Studies Review (2018), pp. 1–16.
77 Céspedes-Báez and Ruiz, ‘“Peace without women does not go!”’, p. 99.
78 See Kreft, Anne-Kathrin, ‘Responding to sexual violence: Women's mobilisation in war’, Journal of Peace Research, 56:2 (2019), pp. 220–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
79 Authors’ interview with Director of Transitional Justice, Ministry of Justice, Bogotá, 2017.
80 Bouvier, ‘Gender and the Role of Women’, p. 21.
81 Authors’ interview with Technical Sub-Commission Government representative, Bogotá, 2017.
82 Authors’ interview with former government negotiator, Bogotá, 2017.
83 El Espectador, ‘Los logros de la Subcomisión de Género en tres acuerdos de la Habana’ (2016), available at: {https://colombia2020.elespectador.com/politica/los-logros-de-la-subcomision-de-genero-en-tres-acuerdos-de-la-habana}.
84 Céspedes-Báez and Ruiz, ‘“Peace without women does not go!”’, p. 102.
85 ABColombia, ‘Towards Transformative Change’, p. 9.
86 Authors’ interview with former Norwegian mediator, Oslo, 2017.
87 Dag Nylander, Rita Sandberg, and Ivan Tvedt, Designing Peace: The Colombian Peace Process, report for Norwegian Centre for Conflict Resolution (NOREF) (5 February 2018).
88 Hilde Salveson and Dag Nylander, Towards an Inclusive Peace: Women and the Gender Approach in the Colombian Peace Process, report for Norwegian Centre for Conflict Resolution (NOREF) (5 July 2017).
89 Authors’ interview with former Norwegian mediator, Oslo, 2017.
90 Boutron, Camille, ‘Engendering peacebuilding: The international gender nomenclature of peace politics and women's participation in the Colombian peace process’, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 13:2 (2018), p. 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
91 Authors’ interview with women's civil society representative, Bogotá, 2017.
92 Author's interview with former government technical team member, Bogotá, 2017.
93 Authors’ interview with FARC member. Icononzo, 2017.
94 Authors’ interview with former FARC combatants, Cajicá, 2017.
95 See Kreft, ‘Responding to sexual violence’; Sanín, Francisco Gutiérrez and Franco, Francy Carranza, ‘Organizing women for combat: The experience of the FARC in the Colombian war’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 17:4 (2017), pp. 770–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Welsh, Alexandra Mary, ‘Women of the jungle: Guerrilleras on the front lines of the FARC-EP’, Glendon Journal of International Studies/Revue d'études internationales de Glendon, 8:1–2 (2015)Google Scholar; Lemaitre, Julieta and Sandvik, Kristin Bergtora, ‘Beyond sexual violence in transitional justice: Political insecurity as a gendered harm’, Feminist Legal Studies, 22:3 (2014), pp. 243–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herrera, Natalia and Porch, Douglas ‘“Like going to a fiesta”: The role of female fighters in Colombia's FARC-EP’, Small Wars & Insurgencies, 19:4 (2008), pp. 609–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; among others.
96 Authors’ interview with FARC leader No. 1, Bogotá, 2017.
97 FARC-EP, Tesis de mujer y género FARC-EP: Congreso Constitutivo del Partido, Feminismo Insurgente (2017).
98 Ibid., p. 3.
99 Authors’ interview with FARC member, Icononzo, 2017.
100 FARC-EP, Tesis de mujer y género, p. 4
101 Ibid., p. 3.
102 Ibid., p. 5.
103 Authors’ interview with FARC leader No. 1, Bogotá, 2017.
104 Ibid.
105 El Espectador, ‘Conozca las sietes mujeres que velarán porque el enfoque de género del acuerdo sea una realidad’ (2017), available at: {https://colombia2020.elespectador.com/pais/conozca-las-siete-mujeres-que-velaran-porque-el-enfoque-de-genero-del-acuerdo-sea-una-realidad}.
106 Céspedes-Báez, Lina, ‘Gender panic and the failure of a peace agreement’, AJIL Unbound, 110 (2016), p. 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
107 Boutron, ‘Engendering peacebuilding’, p. 116.
108 For how gender, and the gender-security nexus, can be politicised, see Aggestam, Karin and Rosamond, Annika Bergman, ‘Re-politicising the gender-security nexus: Sweden's feminist foreign policy’, European Review of International Studies, 5:3 (2018), pp. 30–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: {https://doi.org/10.3224/eris.v5i3.02}.
109 While the question of implementation is not the focus of this article, it is the focus of our future and ongoing research.
110 Christine Bell, Text and Context: Evaluating Peace Agreements for their Gender Perspective, PSRP Report (2015), p. 2.
111 ‘Final Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build A Stable and Lasting Peace’ (24 November 2016), p. 205, available at: {http://especiales.presidencia.gov.co/Documents/20170620-dejacion-armas/acuerdos/acuerdo-final-ingles.pdf}.
112 Salveson and Nylander, ‘Towards an inclusive peace’, p. 5.
113 Authors’ interview with former government negotiator, Bogotá, 2017.
114 Authors’ interview with Ruta Pacifica representative, Bogotá, 2017.
115 Authors’ interview with former government technical team member, Bogotá, 2017.
116 Authors’ interview with Office of the High Commissioner for Peace representative, Bogotá, 2017.
117 Authors’ interview with FARC CSIVI Representative No. 1, Bogotá, 2017.
118 Authors’ interview with Mujeres por la Paz representative, Bogotá, 2017.
119 Authors’ interview with Director of Transitional Justice, Bogotá, 2017.
120 Authors’ interview with former Vice Minister of Defense, Bogotá, 2017.
121 Authors’ interview with with FARC CSIVI Representative No. 2, Bogotá, 2017
122 Putzel and Di John, ‘Meeting the Challenges of Crisis States’, p. 2.
123 Authors’ interview with former FARC combatant, Icononzo, 2017.
124 Authors’ interview with FARC CSIVI representative No. 1, Bogotá, 2017.
125 Authors’ interview with Office of the High Commissioner for Peace representative, Bogotá, 2017.
126 Authors’ interview with Director of Transitional Justice, Bogotá, 2017.
127 Ellerby, ‘A seat at the table’, p. 150.
128 Cumbre Nacional de Mujeres y Paz, Sistematización, 19–21 September, Bogotá (National Summit of Women for Peace, 2016), p. 10.