Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:07:24.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Esthetic and spiritual values motivating collective action for the conservation of cultural landscape—A case study of rice terraces in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2012

Pia R. Kieninger ,
Marianne Penker  and
Eiji Yamaji
Pia R. Kieninger*
Affiliation:
Institute of Integrative Nature Conservation Research, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Marianne Penker
Affiliation:
Institute of Sustainable Economic Development, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Feistmantelstrasse 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Eiji Yamaji
Affiliation:
Department of International Studies, Division of Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, 277-8653 Kashiwa City, Japan.
*
*Corresponding author: kieninger.pia@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Japan's rice terrace landscapes are not only used for food production but also appreciated as a place of high biocultural value. This paper pursues the question as to how far esthetic and spiritual values influence the motivation to participate in collective agricultural actions aiming at the conservation of traditional land use systems, the respective cultural (= traditional rural) landscapes and their biocultural diversity. Our results show that in the Ownership System of Ōyamasenmaida (Chiba Prefecture, Japan) landscape beauty is the main motivator for the mainly urban volunteers (the ‘tenants’) to participate in activities of the local Preservation Association, as well as for visitors who merely come to enjoy the scenery of the rice terraces. The active tenants, however, differ from the ‘passive’ visitors in their ecological interest and emotional attachment to the area. Interestingly, there is also a difference regarding the belief in nature spirits. A higher percentage of people who can imagine that such spirits are always present have been found among the tenants than among the visitors. Even more significant in this respect was the difference between female tenants and female visitors. To what extent spirituality is the cause for or an effect of involvement in nature conservation activities cannot be concluded from this survey. Future studies should therefore take a closer look at the connection between spirituality/religiosity and engagement in nature conservation activities. In Western countries (mainly in Central Europe or North America), nature conservation works on a more ‘scientific’ level, mobilizing engagement through scientific evidence on, for example, losses of species or biodiversity. Addressing the motivations of the volunteers on an emotional, esthetic or social level could be a promising way forward.

Keywords

estheticsbiocultural diversitycollective actionconservation of traditional rural landscapemotivationŌyamasenmaida (Chiba Prefecture, Japan)rice terracessatoyamaspiritualityTanada Ownership System
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 364 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1MAFF—Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2010. FY2009 Annual Report on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. Summary. Available at Web site http://www.maff.go.jp/e/annual_report/2009/pdf/e_all.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
2MOE—Japanese Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation Bureau (ed.). 2010. Biodiversity is Life. Biodiversity is our Life. The National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan 2010. Available at Web site http://www.biodic.go.jp/biodiversity/wakaru/library/files/nbsap2010/nbsap2010_EN.pdf (accessed August 14, 2012)Google Scholar
3Takeuchi, K. 2001. Nature conservation strategies for the ‘SATOYAMA’ and ‘SATOCHI’, habitats for secondary nature in Japan. Global Environment Research 5(2):193–198.Google Scholar
4Takeuchi, K. 2003. The Nature of Satoyama Landscapes. In Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Tsunekawa, A., and Yokohari, M. (eds). Satoyama—The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, p. 9–16.Google Scholar
5FAO 2008. Conservation and Adaptive Management of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS), Terminal Report. Project Symbol: UNTS/GLO/002/GEF, Project ID: 137561. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
6MAFF—Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2009/2010. The 84th and 85th Statistical Yearbook of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2008–2009 and 2009–2010). Available at Web site http://www.maff.go.jp/e/tokei/kikaku/nenji_e/nenji_index.html (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
7MAFF—Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. 2009. Chūsankanchiiki nōgyō o meguru jōsei nōson shinkō kyoku (in Japanese). Available at Web site (http://www.maff.go.jp/j/study/other/cyusan_taisaku/32/pdf/data1.pdf (accessed February 20, 2012).Google Scholar
8Aizaki, H., Sato, K., and Osari, H. 2006. Contingent valuation approach in measuring the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas in Japan. Paddy Water Environment 4:217–222.Google Scholar
9Iwabuchi, S., Kurechi, M., and Kashiwagi, M. 2010. Biodiversity in Rice Paddies 10th UN Convention on Biodiversity, Nagoya, 2010.Google Scholar
10Eder, M. 1955. Die ‘Reisseele’ in Japan und Korea. Folklore Studies XIV:215–244 (in German).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Hagin Mayer, F. 1989. The calendar of village festivals: Japan. Asian Folklore Studies 48:141–147.Google Scholar
12Kagawa-Fox, M. 2010. Environmental ethics from the Japanese perspective. Ethics, Place and the Environment, 13(1):57–73.Google Scholar
13Oyadomari, M. 1989. Profiles. The rise and fall of the nature conservation movement in Japan in relation to some cultural values. Environmental Management 13(1):23–33.Google Scholar
14Agency for Cultural Affairs, Japan, Department of Cultural Properties, Division of Monuments and Sites, Committee on the Preservation, Development, and Utilization of Cultural Landscapes Associated with Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2003. The Report of the Study on the Protection of Cultural Landscapes Associated with Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Available at Web site http://www.bunka.go.jp/english/pdf/nourinsuisan.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
15MIC—Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan, Statistics Bureau, Director-General for Policy Planning (Statistical Standards) and Statistical Research and Training Institute. 2010. Chapter 2. Population. In Statistical Handbook of Japan 2010. Available at Web site http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/c02cont.htm#cha2_1 (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
16MAFF—Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. 2008. Annual Report on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan FY 2008. Policies on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan FY2007. Summary (Provisional Translation). Available at Web site http://www.maff.go.jp/e/annual_report/2008/pdf/e_all.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
17Kobori, H. and Primack, R.B. 2004. Conservation for satoyama, the traditional landscape of Japan. Arnoldia 62(4):2–10.Google Scholar
18Fukuda, H., Dyck, J., and Stout, J. 2003. Rice Sector Policies in Japan—Electronic Outlook Report from the Economic Research Service. Economic Research Service, USDA. p. 1–19. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/rcs/mar03/rcs030301/rcs0303-01.pdf (accessed December 1, 2011).Google Scholar
19MAFF—Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. 2009. Heisei 20 nendo. Chūsankanchiiki tō chokusetsushiharai seido no jisshijōkyō. Nōson shinkō kyoku (in Japanese). Available at Web site: http://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/tyusan/siharai_seido/pdf/h20_zissi_data3.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
20Nakamichi, H. 2010. Rural revitalization through retirement farming in less-favored areas in Japan: The case of elderly farmers in Shikoku. In Conference Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Asian Rural Sociology Association (ARSA), Legazpi City, Philippines, September 6–10, 2010, p. 239–250.Google Scholar
21MLIT—Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. 2006 (in Japanese). Available at Web site http://www.mlit.go.jp/common/000029285.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
22Nakagawa, S. 2003. Approaches to satoyama conservation. In Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Tsunekawa, A., and Yokohari, M. (eds). Satoyama—The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, p. 111–119.Google Scholar
23Kuramoto, N. 2003. Citizen conservation of satoyama landscapes. In Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Tsunekawa, A., and Yokohari, M. (eds). Satoyama—The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, p. 23–39.Google Scholar
24Takeuchi, K. 2003. National land planning of satoyama landscapes. In Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Tsunekawa, A., and Yokohari, M. (eds). Satoyama—The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, p. 200–208.Google Scholar
25MAFF—Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2010. The 85th Statistical Yearbook of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2009–2010). Available at Web site http://www.maff.go.jp/e/tokei/kikaku/nenji_e/85nenji/index.html (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
26Kobayashi, K. and Harada, C. 2010. Conservation of rice terraces in Japan – roles of the Sakaori rice terrace conservation association. Revija za geografijo – Journal for Geography 5–1:91–100.Google Scholar
27Agency for Cultural Affairs, Department of Cultural Properties, Division of Monuments and Sites, Japan. 2003. Nihon no bunkatekikeikan. Nōrinsuisangyō ni kanren suru bunkatekikeikan no hogo ni kansuru chyōsakenkyū hōkokusho (in Japanese).Google Scholar
28Kieninger, P.R., Yamaji, E., and Penker, M. 2011. Urban people as paddy farmers: the Japanese tanada ownership system discussed from a European perspective. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26(4):328–341.Google Scholar
29Saito, Y. 2002. Scenic national landscapes: Common themes in Japan and the United States. Essays in Philosophy 3(1):Article 5.Google Scholar
30Kalland, A. and Asquith, P.J. 1997. Japanese perceptions of nature: Ideals and illusions. In Asquith, P.J. and Kalland, A. (eds). Japanese Images of Nature, Cultural Perspectives, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Man and Nature in Asia, No. 1. Curzon Press, Richmond, UK, p. 1–35.Google Scholar
31Saito, Y. 2010. Future directions for environmental aesthetics. Environmental Values 19:373–391.Google Scholar
32Kalland, A. 1995. Culture in Japanese nature. In Bruun, O. and Kalland, A. (eds). Asian Perceptions of Nature. A Critical Approach, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Studies in Asian Topics, No. 18. Curzon Press, Richmond, UK, p. 243–257.Google Scholar
33Ashkenazi, M. 1997. The cannonization of nature in Japanese culture. Machinery of the natural in food modernization. In Asquith, P.J. and Kalland, A. (eds). Japanese Images of Nature, Cultural Perspectives, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Man and Nature in Asia, No 1. Curzon Press, Richmond, UK, p. 206–220.Google Scholar
34Nagasawa, K. 2008. The mountains, rivers, grasses and trees will all become Buddha – the Japanese view of nature and religion. In Biodiversity Network Japan (ed.). Conserving Nature. A Japanese Perspective, p. 32–35. Available at Web site: http://www.cbd.int/doc/external/cop-09/bnj-nature-en.pdf (accessed August 14, 2012).Google Scholar
35Kieninger, P. and Holzner, W. 2011. Counting species or celebrating fireflies – concepts and conservation of nature in Europe and Japan. In Bergmann, S. and Eaton, H. (eds). Ecological Awareness – Exploring Religion, Ethics and Aesthetics. Studies in Religion and the Environment, 3. LIT Verlag Dr. W. Hopf, Berlin, p. 151–164.Google Scholar
36Kellert, S.R. 1991. Japanese perception of wildlife. Conservation Biology 5:297–308.Google Scholar
37Kellert, S.R. 1993. Attitudes, knowledge, and behavior toward wildlife among the industrial superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Social Issues 49:53–69.Google Scholar
38Kellert, S.R. 1995. Concepts of nature East and West. In Soule, M. and Lease, G. (eds). Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Island Press, San Franciso, p. 103–121.Google Scholar
39Asquith, P.J. and Kalland, A. 1997. Japanese Images of Nature, Cultural Perspectives. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Man and Nature in Asia, No 1. Curzon Press, Richmond, UK.Google Scholar
40Kagami, M. 1998. Significance of the idea of walking in the woods as recreation in Japan. Gobal Environment Research 2:187–192.Google Scholar
41Hayashi, A. 2002. Finding the voice of Japanese wilderness. International Journal of Wilderness 8:34–37.Google Scholar
42Kohsaka, R. and Flintner, M. 2004. Exploring forest aesthetics using forestry photo contest: Case studies examining Japanese and German public preferences. Forest Policy and Economics 6:289–299.Google Scholar
43Tanaka, K. 2010. Limitations for measuring religion in a different cultural context—the case of Japan. Social Science Journal 47:842–852.Google Scholar
44Stark, R., Hamberg, E. and Miller, A.S. 2005. Exploring spirituality and unchurched religions in Amerika, Sweden, and Japan. Journal of Contemporary Religion 20(1):3–23.Google Scholar
45Mullins, M.R. 2011. Religion in contemporary Japanese lives. In Lyon, V. (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Japanese Culture and Society. Routledge, Oxford, p. 63–74.Google Scholar
46Manabe, K. 2007. The structure of Japanese religiosity: Toward a re-examination of secularization in Japan. Kwansei Gakuin University Social Science Review 12:1–21.Google Scholar
47Primack, R., Kobori, H., and Mori, S. 2000. Dragonfly pond restoration promotes conservation awareness in Japan. Conservation Biology 14:1553–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Kobori, H. and Primack, R.B. 2003. Participatory conservation approaches for satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan. Ambio 32:307–311.Google Scholar
49Horiuchi, M., Fukamachi, K., and Oku, H. 2011. Reed community restoration projects with citizen participation: An example of the practical use of satoyama landscape resources in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Landscape Ecology Engineering 7:217–222.Google Scholar
50Shibata, T. and Masuda, M. 2001. Sustainability of tanada owner system: A case study on Obasute Tanada, Koshoku City, Nagano Prefecture. Bulletin of Agricultural and Forestry Research Center, University of Tsukuba 14:19–28 (in Japanese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
51Yamamoto, W., Yamaji, E., and Makiyama, M. 2001. Continuity of the ownership program of rice terraces from the viewpoint of participants' behavior—A case study of oyama-senmaida in Kamogawa City. Journal of Rural Planning Association 20:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Yamamoto, W., Yamaji, E., and Makiyama, M. 2002. Consciousness of rural people for ownership program of rice terraces. A case study of oyama-senmaida ownership program in Kamogawa City. Journal of Rural Planning Association 21:115–120 (in Japanese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
53Yamamoto, W., Makiyama, M., and Yamaji, E. 2003. Continuity of the labor support of local farmers in ‘ownership program’ of rice terraces: Case study in Ohyama District, Kamogawa City. Journal of Rural Planning Association 22:112–121 (in Japanese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
54Takao, K., Maeda, M., and Nonami, H. 2003. Residents' perception of procedural justice in implementing the rice terrace ownership system in Asuka Village, Nara Prefecture. Journal of Rural Planning Association 22:26–36 (in Japanese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
55Yamaji, E. 2006. Enjoyment of rural amenities by ownership program of rice terraces. Journal of Rural Planning Association 25:206–212 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
56Motonaka, M., Sasaki, K., and Aso, M. 2001. The cultural value and its conservation methodology of ‘obasute, tagoto-no-tsuki’ designated as a place of scenic beauty under the law for protection of cultural properties. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture LRJ 64:475–478 (in Japanese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
57Kurita, H., Kimura, Y., Matsumori, K., and Osari, H. 2004. A study on the relationship between physical features of terraced rice fields landscapes and their perception. Journal of Rural Planning Association 23:85–90 (in Japanese, with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Aono, S., Kaga, H., Shimomura, Y., and Masuda, N. 2005. Study on landscape attractiveness to residents from the viewpoint of topographical features in agricultural area and the edge of senboku hill. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture LRJ 68:753–756 (in Japanese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
59Hiwasaki, L. 2005. Toward sustainable management of national parks in Japan: Securing local community and stakeholder participation. Environmental Management 35:753–764.Google Scholar
60Natori, Y., Fukui, W., and Hikasa, M. 2005. Empowering nature conservation in Japanese rural areas: A planning strategy integrating visual and biological landscape perspectives. Landscape and Urban Planning 70:315–324.Google Scholar
61Oku, H. and Fukamachi, K. 2006. The differences in scenic perception of forest visitors through their attributes and recreational activity. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:34–42.Google Scholar
62Omotedani, A. and Murakami, S. 2006. A study of the spatial conditions for viewing the terraced paddy fields. Reports of the City Planning Institute of Japan 4:91–94.Google Scholar
63Natori, Y. and Chenowet, R. 2008. Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28:250–267.Google Scholar
64Iwata, Y., Fukamachi, K., and Morimoto, Y. 2010. Public perception of the cultural value of satoyama landscape types in Japan. Landscape Ecology Engineering 7(2):173–184.Google Scholar
65Omura, H. 2004. Trees, forests and religion in Japan. Mountain Research and Development 24(2):179–182.Google Scholar
66Yin, R.K. 2002. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 5. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
67Ōyamasenmaida Cultural Landscape Preservation Committee. 2006. Ōyama no Senmaida bunkatekikeikan hozon katsuyō keikaku. Kabushiki kaisha koa, Kamogawa Shi (in Japanese).Google Scholar
68ŌSM—Ōyamasenmaida. 2012 (in Japanese). Available at Web site http://www.senmaida.com/index.php (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
69Imperial Household Agency. 2011 (in Japanese). Available at Web site http://www.kunaicho.go.jp/activity/gonittei/01/h22/gonittei-1-2010-3.html (accessed April 19, 2011).Google Scholar
70Paier, D. 2010. Quantitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung, Facultas.wuv Universitätsverlag, Vienna (in German).Google Scholar
71Merriam-Webster. 1992. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. Merriam Webster, Springfield, MA.Google Scholar
72Carlson, A. 2010. Contemporary environmental aesthetics and the requirements of environmentalism. Environmental Values 19:289–314.Google Scholar
73Lintott, S. 2008. Towards Ecofriendly Aesthetics. In Carlson, A. and Lintott, S. (eds). Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism. From Beauty to Duty. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 380–396.Google Scholar
74Anderson, L.M. 1991. Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscapes. Forest Science 27(2):392–400.Google Scholar
75Carlson, A. and Lintott, S. 2008. Introduction. Natural aesthetic value and environmentalism. In Carlson, A. and Lintott, S. (eds). Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism. From Beauty to Duty. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 1–21.Google Scholar
76Hettinger, N. 2008. Objectivity in environmental aesthetics and protection of the environment. In Carlson, A. and Lintott, S. (eds). Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism. From Beauty to Duty. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 413–437.Google Scholar
77Ryan, R.L., Kaplan, R., and Grese, R. 2001. Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44(5):629–648.Google Scholar
78Brady, E. 2008. Aesthetic character and aesthetic integrity in environmental conservation. In Carlson, A. and Lintott, S. (eds). Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism. From Beauty to Duty. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 397–412.Google Scholar
79Brady, E. 2006. Aesthetics in practice: Valuing the natural world. Environmental Values 15:227–291.Google Scholar
80Kieninger, P., Holzner, W., and Kriechbaum, M. 2009. Biocultural diversity and satoyama. Emotions and the fun-factor in nature conservation—a lesson from Japan. Bodenkultur 60(1):15–21.Google Scholar
81Alderfer, C.P. 1969. An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 4(2):142–175.Google Scholar