Skip to main content Accessibility help

Effects of cover crop termination and cotton planting methods on cotton production in conservation systems

  • Leah M. Duzy (a1) and Ted S. Kornecki (a1)


In conservation agriculture, cover crops are utilized to improve soil properties and to enhance cash crop growth. One important part of cover crop management is termination. With smaller profit margins and constraints on time and labor, producers are searching for ways to reduce time and labor required to terminate cover crops while maintaining or increasing profitability. This study examined the effect of 11 different combinations of terminating cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) and planting cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on population, seed cotton yield, total costs and net returns; and how combined operations affect labor, fuel consumption and carbon (CO2) emissions in a conservation system. Cereal rye followed by cotton was planted in central Alabama during the 2009–2011 crop years. Treatments included cotton planted directly into standing cereal rye, cover crops terminated at early milk growth stage using mechanical (roller or roller/crimper) with or without chemical termination (spraying) followed by cotton planting, and cover crop termination combined with cotton planting using spraying with or without rolling termination. While the 2011 crop year had the lowest plant populations, there was no year effect on seed cotton yields, total costs or net returns. Rolling with or without spraying yielded higher plant populations (26%), seed cotton yields (18.3%) and net returns (17.2%) than cotton planted into standing rye; however, rolling with or without spraying also had 23.8% higher costs due to increased fuel usage, machinery and labor hours, and yield varying costs. While rolling with spraying had slightly higher total costs compared with rolling alone (6.5%), plant populations, seed cotton yields and net returns were 11.42%, 6.4% and 6.5% higher, respectively. Converting from three separate operations for cover crop termination and cotton planting to rolling and spraying combined with planting, producers could potentially reduce CO2 emissions from fuel use and labor hours associated with cover crop termination and cotton planting by up to 51%.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Ted S. Kornecki, E-mail:


Hide All
Ashford, DL and Reeves, DW (2003) Use of a mechanical roller crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(1), 3745.
Balkcom, KS, Duzy, LM, Kornecki, TS and Price, AJ (2015) Timing of cover crop termination: management considerations for the southeast. Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management 1(1). doi: 10.2134/cftm2015.0161.
Barnes, JP and Putnam, AR (1983) Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. Journal of Chemical Ecology 9, 10451057.
Brady, NC and Weil, RR (1999) The Nature and Properties of Soils, 12th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bowman, G, Shirley, C and Cramer, C (2007) Managing Cover Crops Profitably, 3rd edn. Beltsville, MD: Sustainable Agriculture Network.
Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) (2016) Annual Report 2015–2016, Cover Crop Survey [Internet]. Available at (Accessed 19 September 2016).
Creamer, NG, Bennett, MA, Stinner, BR, Cardina, J and Regnier, EE (1996) Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems. HortScience 31(3), 410413.
Derpsch, R (2001) Frontiers in conservation tillage and advances in conservation practice [Internet]. In Stott, D.E., Mohtar, R.H., and Steinhardt, G.C. (eds.). Sustaining the Global Farm – Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, May 24-29, 1999. West Lafayette, IN. pp. 248-254; [Cited 19 September 2016]. Available at
Duiker, SW (2014) Establishment and termination dates affect fall-established cover crops. Agronomy Journal 106(2), 670678.
Duzy, LM, Balkcom, KS and Price, AJ (2016) Influence of row spacing, herbicide technology, and tillage on fiber quality and economic returns. Journal of Cotton Science 20, 341355.
Dyer, JA and Desjardins, RL (2003) The impact of farm machinery management on the greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22(3), 5974.
Edwards, W and Boehlje, M (1980) Machinery selection considering timeliness losses. Transactions of the ASAE 23(4), 810815, 821.
Gbur, EE, Stroup, WW, McCarter, KS, Durham, S, Young, LJ, Christman, M, West, M and Kramer, M (2012) Analysis of Generalized Linear Mixed Models in the Agricultural and Natural Resources Sciences. Madison, WI: ASA SSSA and CSSA.
Helsel, ZR (2007) Fuel requirements and energy saving tips for field operations [Internet]. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; [cited September 19, 2016]. Available at
Hoffman, LM, Weston, LA, Snyder, JC and Reginer, EE (1996) Allelopathic influence of germinating seeds and seedlings of cover crops and weed species. Weed Science 44(3), 579584.
Kern, JS and Johnson, MG (1993) Conservation tillage impacts on national soils and atmospheric carbon levels. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57(1), 200210.
Kornecki, TS (2016) The effects of combined cover crops termination and planting in a cotton no-till system. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 32(5), 551560.
Kornecki, TS, Price, AJ and Raper, RL (2006) Performance of different roller designs in terminating rye cover crop and reducing vibration. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 22(5), 633641.
Kornecki, TS, Raper, RL, Arriaga, FJ, Schwab, EB and Bergtold, JS (2009a) Impact of rye rolling direction and different no-till row cleaners on cotton emergence and yield. Transactions of the ASABE 52(2), 383391.
Kornecki, TS, Price, AJ, Raper, RL and Bergtold, JS (2009b) Effectiveness of different herbicide applicators mounted on a roller/crimper for accelerated rye cover crop termination. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 25(6), 819826.
Kornecki, TS, Price, AJ, Raper, RL and Arriaga, FJ (2009c) New roller crimper concepts for mechanical termination of cover crops. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24(3), 165173.
Kornecki, TS, Arriaga, FJ, Price, AJ and Balkcom, KS (2012) Effects of different residue management methods on cotton establishment and yield in a no-till system. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 28(6), 787794.
Lal, R (2004) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International 30(7), 981990.
Laughlin, DH and Spurlock, SR (2008) Mississippi State Budget Generator v6 [Internet]. Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University; [cited 2016 September 19]. Available at
McGregor, KC and Mutchler, CK (1992) Soil loss from conservation tillage for sorghum. Transactions of the ASAE 35(6), 18411845.
Mishra, AK and Sandretto, CL (2002) Stability of farm income and the role of nonfarm income in U.S. agriculture. Review of Agricultural Economics 24(1), 208221.
Mississippi State University (MSU). 2016. 2016 Row Crop Input files [Internet]. Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University; [cited 2017 May 31]. Available at http://www
Nelson, JE, Kephart, KD, Bauer, A and Connor, JF (1995) Growth Stage of Wheat, Barley, and Wild Oat. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Extension Service.
Raper, RL, Reeves, DW, Schwab, EB and Burmester, CH (2000) Reducing soil compaction of Tennessee Valley soils in conservation tillage systems. Journal of Cotton Science 4(2), 8490.
Reeves, DW (1994) Cover crops and rotations. In Hatfield, JL and Stewart, BA (eds). Advances in Soil Science: Crops Residue Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publ., pp. 125172.
Reeves, DW (2003) A Brazilian model for no-tillage cotton production adapted to the southeastern USA. In Proceedings of the II World Congress on Conservation Agriculture-Producing in Harmony with Nature. Iguassu Falls, Paraná, Brazil, pp.372–374.
Ritchie, GL, Bednarz, CW, Jost, RH and Brown, SM (2004) Cotton growth and development [Internet]. The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; [cited 5 September 2017]. Available at
Runge, M (2016) 2016 enterprise planning budget summaries, cotton, south Alabama, reduced tillage, non-irrigated [Internet]. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University; [cited 2017 May 16]. Available at
SAS Institute Inc (2014) SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Schomberg, HH, McDaniel, RG, Mallard, E, Endale, DM, Fisher, DS and Cabrera, ML (2006) Conservation tillage and cover crop influences on cotton production on a southeastern U.S. coastal plain soil. Agronomy Journal 98(5), 12471256.
United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) (2016) Farm labor [Internet]. Washington, DC; [cited 2017 June 20]. Available at
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS) (2016a) Quick Stats 2.0 [Internet]. Washington, DC; [cited 2016 September 18]. Available at
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS) (2016b) Land use practices [Internet]. Washington, DC; [cited 2016 September 18]. Available at
University of Georgia (UGA) (2017) Cotton enterprise budgets [Internet]. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural and Applied Economics; [cited 2017 September 1]. Available at
Wrather, JA, Phipps, BJ, Stevens, WE, Phillips, AS and Vories, ED (2008) Cotton planting date and plant population effects on yield and fiber quality in the Mississippi Delta. Journal of Cotton Science 12, 17.
Zadoks, JC, Chang, TT and Konzak, CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415421.


Effects of cover crop termination and cotton planting methods on cotton production in conservation systems

  • Leah M. Duzy (a1) and Ted S. Kornecki (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed