Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:13:17.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of grower perceptions and factors influencing adoption of IPM in commercial cranberry production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2007

G. Blake ,
H.A. Sandler ,
W. Coli ,
D.M. Pober  and
C. Coggins
G. Blake
Affiliation:
Bard College, PO Box 5000, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504, USA.
H.A. Sandler*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, PO Box 569, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
W. Coli
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
D.M. Pober
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
C. Coggins
Affiliation:
Simon's Rock College of Bard, 84 Alford Road, Great Barrington, MA 01230, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: hsandler@umext.umass.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A survey was developed and distributed to the Massachusetts cranberry grower community in 1999 to identify biological, educational, social and political barriers to the adoption of available integrated pest management (IPM) practices. The response rate for the 450 growers who received the survey was 54%. Approximately 80% of respondents claimed to practice IPM frequently and 16% identified themselves as occasional practitioners. Most growers practiced IPM because they agreed with IPM philosophy (80%) and believed it had environmental benefits (73%). Ninety-two percent agreed that more IPM-related research and education programs would encourage them to adopt practices they are not currently using. A significant percentage of respondents used multiple IPM component practices, with practices involving monitoring and detection of pests along with judicious use of pesticides being most common. Factor analysis was used to condense 104 potential responses to 22 factors, which were then used as predictors with six demographic variables (IPM adoption, education level, age, experience, farm size and work status). Demographic factors influenced a grower's tendency to incorporate IPM into routine farm activities. Full-time, highly experienced growers in charge of large operations tended frequently to use more IPM practices than less experienced growers who worked part-time and managed smaller farms. A large proportion of respondents agreed that IPM can reduce pesticide residues in food (92%) and the environment (96%), and can help to preserve beneficial insects (96%). Although many growers held the perception that IPM can pose measurable economic risk (and subsequently act as a barrier to adoption), growers appeared to feel less strongly about the economic benefits than potential environmental ones.

Keywords

integrated pest managementVaccinium macrocarponadoptionsurveys
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 134 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zalom, F.G. and Fry, W.E. (eds). 1992. Food, Crop Pests, and the Environment: The Need and Potential for Biologically Intensive Integrated Pest Management. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN, USA.Google Scholar
2 Olkowski, W.M., Olkowski, H., and Daar, S. 1991. What is integrated pest management? IPM Practitioner 13:1–7.Google Scholar
3 Stern, V.M., Smith, R.F., van den Bosch, R., and Hagen, K.S. 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29:81–101.Google Scholar
4 Sandler, H.A. 1997. Integrated pest management in cranberry. In Sandler, H.A. (ed.). Cranberry Production: A Guide for Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts Cranberry Station Extension Publication, East Wareham, MA, USA. p. 51–58.Google Scholar
5 Kovach, J. and Tette, J.P. 1988. A survey of the use of IPM by New York apple producers. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 20:101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Pendleton, B.B., Teetes, G.L., and Parker, R.D. 2000. Quantifying Texas sorghum growers' use of IPM for insect pests. Southwestern Entomologist 25:39–53.Google Scholar
7 Hollingsworth, C.S. and Coli, W.M. 2001. IPM adoption in northeastern U.S.: an examination of the IPM continuum. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 16:177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Musser, W.N., Wetzstein, M.E., Reece, S.Y., Varca, P.E., Edwards, D.M., and Douce, G.K. 1986. Beliefs of farmers and adoption of integrated pest management. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 38:34–44.Google Scholar
9 Ridgeley, A. and Brush, S.B. 1992. Social factors and selective technology adoption: the case of integrated pest management. Human Organization 51:367–378.Google Scholar
10 Szmedra, P.I., McClendon, R.W., and Wetzstein, M.E. 1990. Partial adoption of divisible technologies in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 42:20–26.Google Scholar
11 Vandeman, A., Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Jans, S., and Hwan Lin, B. 1994. Adoption of integrated pest management in U.S. agriculture. Agricultural Information Bulletin 707. USDA, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
12 McDonald, D.G. and Glynn, C.J. 1994. Difficulties in measuring adoption of apple IPM: a case study. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 48:219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Nowak, P., Padgette, S.R., and Hoban, T. 1996. Practical considerations in assessing barriers to IPM adoption. In Greene, C. and Kramer-LeBlanc, C. (eds). Proceedings of the Third National IPM Symposium Workshop. Washington, DC, USA. p. 92–112.Google Scholar
14 Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
15 Salant, P. and Dillman, D.A. 1994. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
16 Smith, D.T. and Aerts, M.J. 1997. Conducting Surveys on Pest and Pest Management Practices. Texas A&M Departmental Technical Report 97-07. College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
17 Barrientos, T. and Anciso, J.A. 1996. Perceptions of integrated pest management practices for cucurbit pests for Texas growers. Subtropical Plant Science 48:19–21.Google Scholar
18 Corbet, P.S. 1981. Non-entomological impediments to the adoption of integrated pest management. Protection Ecology 3:183–202.Google Scholar
19 Leslie, A.R. and Cuperus, G.W.(eds). 1993. Successful Implementation of Integrated Pest Management for Agricultural Crops. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
20 Hamilton, G.C., Robson, M.G., Ghidiu, G.M., Samulis, R., and Prostko, E. 1997. 75% adoption of IPM by the year 2000? American Entomologist 43(2):74–77.Google Scholar
21 Rajotte, E.G., Kazmierczak, R.F., Norton, G.W., Lambur, M.T., and Allen, W.A. 1987. The national evaluation of extension integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Virginia Cooperative Extension Services/USDA VCES Publication 491-010. Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
22 Wearing, C.H. 1988. Evaluating the IPM implementation process. Annual Review of Entomology 33:17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Weber, D.C. 1997. Commodity-wide Assessment of Cranberry Pest Management. Report from Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program 1996. http://www.pesp.org/1996/cranbery96-final.htm.Google Scholar
24 Mahr, S.E.R. and Moffitt, L.J. 1994. Biologic and economic assessment of pesticide usage in the cranberry industry. USDA NAPIAP Report No. 2-CA-94.Google Scholar
25 Averill, A.L. and Sylvia, M. 2002. Outbreak of cranberry weevil in Massachusetts: all clear for now. Cranberries 66(6):8–9, 22.Google Scholar
26 Averill, A.L. and Sylvia, M.M. 2006. Insect management 2006. In Sylvia, M.M. and Cannon, D. (eds). Cranberry Chart Book-Management guide for Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station Extension Publication, East Wareham, MA USA. p. 6–17.Google Scholar
27 Ganim-Barnes, N. 2006. The Grower Study II: Innovations, Viability, and the Future of Massachusetts Cranberry Bogs. University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, Center for Marketing Research, N. Dartmouth, MA, USA.Google Scholar
28 Farrimond, D. 2005. 2004 Crop Year Cranberry Retrospective. Cranberry Marketing Committee, Wareham, MA, USA.Google Scholar
29 Roper, T.R. 1999. Cranberry cultivar acreage survey: are we shunning genetic diversity? Cranberries 63(5):13–14.Google Scholar
30 Simon, B.D. 1995. Cranberries and government deregulation: the environmental consequences. Great Lakes Wetlands 6(4):1–2, 8.Google Scholar
31 SAS Institute. 2001. Release 8.2 (TS2M0) of the SAS System for Microsoft Windows. Cary, N.C.Google Scholar
32 Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., and Jurs, S.G. 2002. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
33 Statistical Services. 1995. Factor Analysis Using SAS Proc Factor. The University of Texas at Austin. Available at Website http://www.utexas.edu/cc/docs/stat53.html (accessed August 2005).Google Scholar
34 Croston, J. 1999. Shades of Green: New Groups an Outgrowth of Pesticide Concerns. Cape Cod Times, 23 April. Hyannis, MA, USA. Available at Website http://www.capecodtimesonline.com/cctimes/archives/1999/apr/4-23/green.23.htm.Google Scholar
35 Curtis, J. 1998. Fields of change: A New Crop of Farmers Finds Alternatives to Pesticides. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
36 Averill, A.L., Sylvia, M.M., Kusek, C.C., and DeMoranville, C.J. 1997. Flooding in cranberry to minimize insecticide and fungicide inputs. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12(2):50–54.Google Scholar
37 Botelho, M.R. and Vanden Heuvel, J.E. 2005. High dissolved oxygen concentration of floodwater reduces carbohydrate concentration of cranberry uprights during flooding. HortScience 40:569–573.Google Scholar
38 Vanden Heuvel, J.E. and Botelho, M.R. 2005. Flooding effects on cranberry uprights vary by season. HortScience 40:498.Google Scholar
39 Sandler, H.A. and Mason, J. 1997. Evaluation of three bioinsecticides for control of lepidopteran pests in cranberries. Acta Horticulturae 446:447–455.Google Scholar
40 Anderson, M.A. 1990. Farming with reduced synthetic chemicals in North Carolina. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5:60–68.Google Scholar
41 Coli, W.M., Szala, R., Autio, W.R., Cooley, D.R., Hauschild, K.I., and Prokopy, R.J. 1996. 1995 Tree fruit survey: integrated pest management. In Autio, W.R. and Bramlage, W.J. (eds). Fruit Notes. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. p. 13–18.Google Scholar