Skip to main content Accessibility help

Agri-food firms, universities, and corporate social responsibility: what's in the public interest?

  • Robert M. Chiles (a1) (a2) (a3), Leland Glenna (a4), Amit Sharma (a3) (a5), Jeffrey Catchmark (a3) (a6), C. Daniel Azzara (a7) (a8) and Audrey Maretzki (a8)...


The complexities of the global agri-food system and the singular importance of food as a primary good elevate the need to explore what corporate social responsibility (CSR) might mean for agri-food firms. Although CSR refers to voluntary actions on the part of capitalist firms to exceed legal and regulatory requirements, those requirements are important because they set the institutional foundation for what a firm must do to earn the CSR label. In the case of CSR for agri-food firms, the institutional context includes the regulatory state as well as the publicly supported agricultural and food research and development that tends to be done at universities. The purpose of this paper is to provide greater conceptual clarity to the blur between the state, agri-food firms, and universities and their respective responsibilities to the public. Since the globalization of the agri-food system and the emergence of private forms of governance signal the decline of the state's legal and regulatory influence on corporate firms, we pay particularly close attention to the ethical challenges that have surrounded university–agribusiness collaborations—initiatives, which conjoin the moral concerns associated with each respective institution while also raising new questions in their own right. Although the university would ideally play a critical participatory role in this process by virtue of its public commitments, as we explain, the historical relationship between the university and agri-food firms has complicated the university's potential standing as an independent arbiter. Upon examining each of these issues in greater detail, we conclude the paper with a blueprint for how universities can enhance their ethical leadership when engaging with agri-food firms.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Robert M. Chiles, E-mail:


Hide All
Aviv, R (2014) A Valuable Reputation, The New Yorker, February 10.
Barham, L (2002) Towards a theory of values-based labeling. Agriculture and human values 19, 349360.
Barham, E (2003) Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of rural studies 19, 127138.
Blake, NM (1956) Water for the Cities: A History of the Urban Water Supply Problem in the United States/Nelson Manfred Blake, Maxwell School Series ;3. Syracuse, N.Y: Syracuse University Press.
Block, F and Keller, MR (2011) Where do innovations come from?. Transformations in the US Economy, 1970–2006, Reasserting the Public Interest Knowledge Governance, pp. 81104.
Bonanno, A and Constance, DH (2008) Stories of Globalization: Transnational Corporations, Resistance, and the State. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
Brandl, B and Glenna, LL (2016) Intellectual Property and Agricultural Science and Innovation in Germany and the United States, Science, Technology, & Human Values, p. 0162243916675954.
Busch, L (2000) The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies 16, 273.
Busch, L (2011) The private governance of food: equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar? Agriculture and Human Values 28, 345352.
Busch, L (2014) Governance in the age of global markets: challenges, limits, and consequences. Agriculture and Human Values 31, 513523.
Busch, L, Lacy, WB, Burkhardt, J and Lacy, LR (1991) Plants, Power, and Profit: Social, Economic, and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Buttel, FH (2005) Ever since hightower: the politics of agricultural research activism in the molecular age. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 275.
Campbell, TID and Slaughter, S (1999) Faculty and administrators’ attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. The Journal of Higher Education 70, 309352.
Casassus, B (2014) Paper claiming GM link with tumours republished. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature.2014.15463.
Charles, D (2013) American farmers say they feed the world, but do they? NPR.
Clancy, M, Fuglie, K and Heisey, P (2016) US agricultural R&D in an Era of falling public funding. Amber Waves, 1.
Cotula, L, Vermeulen, S, Leonard, R and Keeley, J (2009) Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa, IIED, FAO, IFAD.
Curry, J and Kenney, M (1990) Land-grant university-industry relationships in biotechnology: a comparison with the non-land-grant research universities. Rural Sociology 55, 4457.
Eisenberg, RS (1996) Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review 82, 16631725.
Fuchs, D, Kalfagianni, A and Havinga, T (2011 a) Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values 28, 353.
Fuchs, D, Kalfagianni, A, Clapp, J and Busch, L (2011 b) Introduction to symposium on private agrifood governance: values, shortcomings and strategies. Agriculture and Human Values 28, 335344.
Gelles, D (2015) Social Responsibility That Rubs Right Off, The New York Times, October 17, p. BU3,
Glenna, LL (2017) AFHVS 2017 presidential address. Agriculture and Human Values, Springer: The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), 34, 10211031.
Glenna, LL, Lacy, WB, Welsh, R and Biscotti, D (2007) University administrators, agricultural biotechnology, and academic capitalism: defining the public good to promote university-industry relationships. The Sociological Quarterly 48, 141164.
Glenna, LL, Welsh, R, Ervin, D, Lacy, WB and Biscotti, D (2011) Commercial science, scientists’ values, and university biotechnology research agendas. Research Policy 40, 957968.
Glenna, LL, Tooker, J, Rick Welsh, J and Ervin, D (2015) Intellectual property, scientific independence, and the efficacy and environmental impacts of genetically engineered crops. Rural Sociology 80, 147172.
Godard, B and Aruldhas, J (2014) Responsible innovation in the food sector, In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 15991605.
Graff, GD, Cullen, SE, Bradford, KJ, Zilberman, D and Bennett, AB (2003) The public–private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 21, 989995.
Hanel, P and St-Pierre, M (2006) Industry–university collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31, 485499.
Hatanaka, M, Carmen, B and Lawrence, B (2005) Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food policy 30, 354369.
Hayashi, T (2003) Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university–industry–government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes. Research Policy 32, 14211442.
Hess, DJ (2007) Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an era of Globalization, urban and Industrial Environments. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Howard, PH (2016) Concentration and Power in the Food System: Who Controls What We Eat?, vol. 3. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Jones, P, Comfort, D and Hillier, D (2017) European food and drink wholesalers and sustainability. European Journal of Sustainability 1, 112.
Jongbloed, B, Enders, J and Salerno, C (2008) Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education 56, 303324.
Kleinfeld, J (2016) The double life of international law: indigenous peoples and extractive industries. Harvard Law Review 129, 1755.
Kleinman, DL (1998) Untangling context: understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world. Science, Technology & Human Values 23, 285.
Kleinman, DL (2003) Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. Madison, Wis: Science and technology in society, University of Wisconsin Press.
Konefal, J, Mascarenhas, M and Hatanaka, M (2005) Governance in the global agro-food system: backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 291.
Konefal, J, Hatanaka, M and Constance, DH (2014) Patchworks of sustainable agriculture standards and metrics in the United States. In Alternative Agrifood Movements: Patterns of Convergence and Divergence. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 257280.
Korten, DC (1995) When Corporations Rule the World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
Lei, Z, Juneja, R and Wright, BD (2009) Patents versus patenting: implications of intellectual property protection for biological research. Nature Biotechnology 27, 3640.
Link, AN and Siegel, DS (2005) University-based technology initiatives: quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy 34, 253257.
Maloni, MJ and Brown, ME (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. Journal of business ethics 68, 3552.
Marks, JH (2014) Toward a systemic ethics of public–private partnerships related to food and health. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24, 267299.
Martin, B (1999) Suppressing research data: methods, context, accountability, and responses. Accountability in Research 6, 333372.
McMillan, GS, Narin, F and Deeds, DL (2000) An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy 29, 18.
McSherry, C (2001) Who Owns Academic Work: Battling for Control of Intellectual Property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McWilliams, A and Siegel, D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26, 117127.
Mohr, LA and Webb, DJ (2005) The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39, 121147.
Mowery, DC and Sampat, BN (2004) The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer 30, 115127.
Nikulainen, T (2010) The outcomes of individual-level technology transfer and the role of research collaboration networks, ETLA discussion paper.
Nurhadi, D and Wu, MC (2016) Developing partnership program between polytechnic and industry in the remote area: a strategy to improve graduates quality. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 17, 1125.
Owen-Smith, J (2006) Commercial imbroglios: proprietary science and the contemporary university. In The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 6390.
Pardey, PG and Beintema, NM (2001) Slow Magic: Agricultural R&D A Century After Mendel. Washington, DC: Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
Powers, JB and Campbell, EG (2011) Technology commercialization effects on the conduct of research in higher education. Research in Higher Education 52, 245260.
Poyago-Theotoky, J, Beath, J and Siegel, DS (2002) Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of university–industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18, 1021.
Rohrbeck, R and Arnold, HM (2006) Making university-industry collaboration work-a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories contrasted with findings in literature, paper presented to ISPIM Annual Conference: ‘Networks for Innovation’, Athens, Greece.
Ross, SA (1973) The economic theory of agency: the principal's problem. The American Economic Review 63, 134139.
Sellenthin, MO (2009) Technology transfer offices and university patenting in Sweden and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer 34, 603620.
Shamir, R (2011) Socially responsible private regulation: world-culture or world-capitalism? Law & Society Review 45, 313336.
Siegel, DS, Waldman, DA, Atwater, LE and Link, AN (2003) Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 14, 111133.
Sterckx, S (2011) Patenting and licensing of university research: promoting innovation or undermining academic values? Science and Engineering Ethics 17, 4564.
Stevens, DE and Thevaranjan, A (2005) Is there Room Within Principal-Agent Theory for Ethics?.
Thompson, PB (2015) From Field to Fork: Food Ethics for Everyone. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
UN (2008) United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. pp. 118.
Vanloqueren, G and Baret, PV (2009) How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy 38, 971983.
Waltz, E (2009) Under wraps. Nature Biotechnology 27, 880882.
Weidner, CH (1974) Water for A City; A History of New York City's Problem From the Beginning to the Delaware River System. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press.
Welsh, R and Glenna, L (2006) Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies. Social Studies of Science 36, 929942.
Wright, BD (2007) Agricultural innovation after the diffusion of intellectual property protection. In Kesan, JP (ed.), Agricultural Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: Seeds of Change. Cambridge, MA: CABI International, pp. 118.
Xia, Y and Buccola, S (2005) University life science programs and agricultural biotechnology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, 229243.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed