Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-66d7dfc8f5-cdn8t Total loading time: 2.086 Render date: 2023-02-08T12:06:40.067Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Cutting management and alfalfa stand age effects on organically grown corn grain yield and soil N availability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2017

Adria L. Fernandez*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Karina P. Fabrizzi
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, 439 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Nicole E. Tautges
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
John A. Lamb
Affiliation:
Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, 439 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Craig C. Sheaffer
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: ferna108@umn.edu

Abstract

Alfalfa is recommended as a rotational crop in corn production, due to its ability to contribute to soil nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) stocks through atmospheric N2 fixation and above- and belowground biomass production. However, there is little information on how alfalfa management practices affect contributions to soil and subsequent corn crop yields, and research has not been targeted to organic systems. A study was conducted to determine the effects of alfalfa stand age, cutting frequency and biomass removal on soil C and N status and corn yields at three organically managed Minnesota locations. In one experiment, five cutting treatments were applied in nine environments: two, three and four cuts with biomass removal; three cuts with biomass remaining in place; and a no-cut control. In the other experiment, corn was planted following 1-, 2-, 3- or 4-year-old alfalfa stands and a no-alfalfa control. Yield was measured in the subsequent corn crop. In the cutting experiment, the two- and three-cut treatments with biomass removal reduced soil mineral N by 12.6 and 11.5%, respectively, compared with the control. Potentially mineralizable N (PMN) was not generally affected by cutting treatments. The three-cut no-removal increased potentially mineralizable C by 17% compared with the other treatments, but lowered soil total C in two environments, suggesting a priming effect in which addition of alfalfa biomass stimulated microbial mineralization of native soil C. Although both yields and soil mineral N tended to be higher in treatments where biomass remained in place, this advantage was small and inconsistent, indicating that farmers need not forgo hay harvest to obtain the rotational benefits of an alfalfa stand. The lack of overall correlation between corn grain yields and mineral and potentially mineralizable N suggests that alfalfa N contribution was not the driver of the yield increase in the no-removal treatments. Alfalfa stand age had inconsistent effects on fall-incorporated N and soil N and C parameters. Beyond the first year, increased alfalfa stand age did not increase soil mineral N or PMN. However, corn yield increased following older stands. Yields were 29, 77 and 90% higher following first-, second- and third-year alfalfa stands than the no-alfalfa control, respectively. This indicates that alfalfa may benefit succeeding corn through mechanisms other than N contribution, potentially including P solubilization and weed suppression. These effects have been less studied than N credits, but are of high value in organic cropping systems.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angers, D. 1992. Changes in soil aggregation and organic carbon under corn and alfalfa. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56:12441249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldock, J.O., Hedtcke, J.L., Posner, J.L., and Hall, J.A. 2014. Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin integrated cropping systems trial: III. Yield Trends. Agronomy Journal 106.4:15091522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balesdent, J., Chenu, C., and Balabane, M. 2000. Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage. Soil and Tillage Research 53:215230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, L.W., Sparling, B., Tenuta, M., and Entz, M.H. 2012. Soil profile carbon and nutrient stocks under long-term conventional and organic crop and alfalfa-crop rotations and re-established grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 158:156163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, T., Angus, J., and Peoples, M. 2003. Comparison of nitrogen mineralisation patterns from root residues of Trifolium subterraneum and Medicago sativa. Biology and Fertility of Soils 38:296300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowren, K.E., Cooke, D.A., and Downey, R.K. 1969. Yield of dry matter and nitrogen from tops and roots of sweetclover, alfalfa, and red clover at five stages of growth. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 49:6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, S.M., Peterson, R.L., and Bowley, S.R. 1991. Interactions between three alfalfa nodulation genotypes and two Glomus species. New Phytologist 119:115120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruulsema, T. and Christie, B. 1987. Nitrogen contribution to succeeding corn from alfalfa and red clover. Agronomy Journal 79:96100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, J.A., Sheaffer, C.C., Wyse, D.L., Haar, M.J., Porter, P.M., Quiring, S.R., and Klossner, L.D. 2011. Agronomic performance of cropping systems with contrasting crop rotations and external inputs. Agronomy Journal 103:182192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnes, D., Karlen, D., and Jaynes, D. 2002. Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained Midwestern soils. Agronomy Journal 94:153171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, L.E., Cambardella, C.A., Reeder, J.D., and Rice, C.W. 1996. Potentially mineralizable nitrogen as an indicator of biologically active soil nitrogen. In Doran, J.W. and Jones, A.J. (eds.). Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Spec. Publ. 49. SSSA, Madison, WI, p. 217229.Google Scholar
Gregorich, E.G., Drury, C.F., and Baldock, J.A. 2001. Changes in soil carbon under long-term maize in monoculture and legume-based rotation. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 81:2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groya, F.L. and Sheaffer, C.C. 1985. Nitrogen from forage legumes: harvest and tillage effects. Agronomy Journal 77:105109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G.H. and Hesterman, O.B. 1990. Quantifying the nitrogen contribution from Alfalfa to soil and two succeeding crops using nitrogen-15. Agronomy Journal 82:129134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heichel, G.H., Barnes, D.K., Vance, C.P., and Henjum, K.I. 1984. Dinitrogen fixation, and N and dry matter partitioning during a 4-year alfalfa stand. Crop Science 24:811815.Google Scholar
Hesterman, O.B., Sheaffer, C.C., Barnes, D.K., Lueschen, W.E., and Ford, J.H. 1986. Alfalfa dry matter and nitrogen production, and fertilizer nitrogen response in legume–corn rotations. Agronomy Journal 78:1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, W. (ed). 1980. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Iyamuremye, F., Dick, R., and Baham, J. 1996. Organic amendments and phosphorus dynamics: II. Distribution of soil phosphorus fractions. Soil Science 161:436443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun, P.B.C., and Bojesen, R.H. 2014. lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0-33.Google Scholar
Laboski, C.A.M., Peters, J.R., and Bundy, L.G. 2006. Nutrient application guidelines for field, vegetable, and fruit crops in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Service. Available at Web site http://www.learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/A2809.pdf (verified 16 January 2017).Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.R., Ketterings, Q.M., and Cherney, J.H. 2008. Effect of nitrogen application on yield and quality of silage corn after forage legume-grass. Agronomy Journal 100:7379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G.C., Mahler, R.L., and Everson, D.O. 1990. Effects of plant residues and environmental factors on phosphorus availability in soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 21:471491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncada, K.M. and Sheaffer, C.C. 2010. Chapter 13: winter cover crops. In Moncada, K.M. and Sheaffer, C.C. (eds.). Risk Management Guide for Organic Producers. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. pp. 13-1–13-22.Google Scholar
Moore, J.M., Klose, S., and Tabatabai, M.A. 2000. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31:200210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ominski, P.D., Entz, M.H., and Kenkel, N. 1999. Weed suppression by medicago sativa in subsequent cereal crops: A comparative survey. Weed Science 47:282290.Google Scholar
Pascault, N., Ranjard, L., Kaisermann, A., Bachar, D., Christen, R., Terrat, S., Mathieu, O., Leveque, J., Mougel, C., Henault, C., Lemanceau, P., Pean, M., Boiry, S., Fontaine, S., and Maron, P.-A. 2013. Stimulation of different functional groups of bacteria by various plant residues as a driver of soil priming effect. Ecosystems 16:810822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Rehm, G. and Schmitt, M.A. 1989. Fertilizing Alfalfa in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Extension Service AG-FO-3814. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Rehm, G., Randall, G., Lamb, J., and Eliason, R. 2006. Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Extension FO-3790-C. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Richardson, A.E., Barea, J.M., McNeill, A.M., and Prigent-Combaret, C. 2009. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant and Soil 321:305339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, M.M. 1967. Effect of density and control of Canada thistle on production and utilization of alfalfa pasture. Weeds 15:138142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheaffer, C.C. and Seguin, P. 2003. Forage legumes for sustainable cropping systems. Journal of Crop Production 8:187216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheaffer, C.C., Barnes, D.K., Heichel, G.H., Marten, G.C., and Lueschen, W.E. 1988. Seeding year nitrogen and dry matter yields of nondormant and moderately dormant alfalfa. Journal of Production Agriculture 1:261265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheaffer, C.C., Barnes, D.K., and Heichel, G.H. 1989. ‘Annual’ Alfalfa in Crop Rotations. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. Available at Web site http://hdl.handle.net/11299/139539 (verified 16 January 2017).Google Scholar
Six, J., Elliott, E., and Paustian, K. 2000. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32:20992103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snapp, S.S., Swinton, S.M., Labarta, R., Mutch, D., Black, J.R., Leep, R., Nyiraneza, J., and O-Neil, K. 2005. Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs, and performance within cropping system niches. Agronomy Journal 97:322332.Google Scholar
Tomm, G., Walley, F., and van Kessel, C. 1995. Nitrogen cycling in an alfalfa and bromegrass sward via litterfall and harvest losses. Agronomy Journal 87:10781085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Undersander, D., Cosgrove, D., Cullen, E., Grau, C., Rice, M.E., Renz, M., Sheaffer, C., Shewmaker, G., and Sulc, M. 2011. Alfalfa Management Guide. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Wells, M.S., Holen, D., and Sheaffer, C.C. 2015. Forage Production: Alfalfa Establishment. University of Minnesota Extension, St. Paul, MN. Available at Web site http://www.extension.umn.edu/agriculture/forages/establishment/alfalfa-establishment/ (verified 16 January 2017).Google Scholar
Yost, M., Coulter, J.C., and Russelle, M.P. 2013. First-year corn after alfalfa showed no response to fertilizer nitrogen under no-tillage. Agronomy Journal 105:208214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, M., Russelle, M.P., and Coulter, J.C. 2014. Field-specific fertilizer nitrogen requirements for first-year corn following alfalfa. Agronomy Journal 106:645658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, M.A., Coulter, J.C., Russelle, M.P., Sheaffer, C.C., and Kaiser, D.E. 2012. Alfalfa nitrogen credit to first-year corn: potassium, regrowth, and tillage timing effects. Agronomy Journal 104:953962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, M.A., Russelle, M.P., Coulter, J.A., Schmitt, M.A., Sheaffer, C.C., and Randall, G.W. 2015. Stand age affects fertilizer nitrogen response in first-year corn following alfalfa. Agronomy Journal 107:486494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Cutting management and alfalfa stand age effects on organically grown corn grain yield and soil N availability
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Cutting management and alfalfa stand age effects on organically grown corn grain yield and soil N availability
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Cutting management and alfalfa stand age effects on organically grown corn grain yield and soil N availability
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *