Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T01:54:42.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Complement of Leave-Taking’ between Lear and the King of France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

William Nelson
William Nelson*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the troublesome problems in King Lear concerns the parting between the kings of England and France in the first scene of the first act. When France espouses the dowerless Cordelia, Lear turns on him angrily:

Thou hast her, France; let her be thine, for we

Have no such daughter, nor shall ever see

That face of hers again; therefore be gone

Without our grace, our love, our benison.

(I.i.262-265)

To the insulting ‘be gone’ he adds a brutal snub, ‘Come, noble Burgundy,' and walks off without giving France the opportunity to reply. Commentators on the play ask us to believe that a few minutes later the two kings meet again for a formal leave-taking.

Type
Studies
Information
Renaissance Quarterly , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Summer 1974 , pp. 193 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Some editors suppose that the words ‘therefore be gone… benison’ are addressed to Cordelia. The only warrant for this must be the notion that Lear would not have addressed a brother monarch in such terms. But Lear's rashness is one of the points of the play. Kent's espousal of Cordelia's cause made him reach for his sword; is it strange that France's espousal of Cordelia should have made him lose his temper? 2 Greg, W. W., ‘Time, Place, and Politics in King Lear,’ Modem Language Review, 25 (1940)Google Scholar, 444.