Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:45:54.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2021

WILLIAM HASKER Open the ORCID record for WILLIAM HASKER [Opens in a new window]
WILLIAM HASKER*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Huntington University, Huntington, IN4750, USA
*
e-mail: whasker@huntington.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Brian Leftow continues to argue against my use of the constitution relation in explaining the Trinity. I consider his arguments, and have a bit more to say about Leftow's own formulation of trinitarian doctrine.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 553 - 562
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hasker, William (2013) Metaphysics and the Tri-Personal God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasker, William (2021) ‘Constituting the Trinity’, Religious Studies, 57, 523–531.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2009) ‘Anti social trinitarianism’, in McCall, Thomas & Rea, M. C. (eds) Philosophical and theological Essays on the Trinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 52–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2012) ‘Time travel and the Trinity’, Faith and Philosophy, 29, 313–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2018) ‘The Trinity is unconstitutional’, Religious Studies, 54, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2021) ‘The Trinity is still unconstitutional’, Religious Studies, 57, 532–552.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith (2015) Christ and the Cosmos: A Reformulation of Trinitarian Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar