Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:31:14.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doing natural theology consistently with theism and why one might stop trying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

T. J. MAWSON*
Affiliation:
St Peter's College, Oxford, OX1 2DL, UK

Abstract

Theists such as Swinburne who seek to use natural theological arguments to move from observations about the world to conclusions about the existence (or probable existence) of God seem to need premises concerning what the world would have been like were Theism to have been false, viz. premises to the effect that it would have been (or would probably have been) different from the way we observe the actual world to be. Surely only that way could observations of the actual world be taken to be evidence that Theism is true.1 And surely for such arguments to be dialectically powerful in discussions with Atheists, these premises need to be acceptable to Theists and Atheists alike.2 In this article, I call these claims into question.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Leftow, Brian (2010) ‘Swinburne on divine necessity’, Religious Studies, 46, 141162.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1977 & 1993) The Coherence of Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1979 & 1993) The Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1994) The Christian God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar