Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:26:24.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introducing the Market in a Shortage Economy: The Vertical Integration Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Gérard Roland*
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Get access

Summary

It is well known that in the traditional Soviet-type economies, there is a spontaneous tendency of enterprise and ministries to integrate vertically, as a response to the supply uncertainty typical of a chronic shortage economy.

The main purpose of the paper is to analyze the link between the vertical integration issue and economic reform. It is argued that, in an institutional context with fixed prices, when there is shortage of inputs, enterprises consuming these inputs will generally not be able to agree on a rationing scheme, in the absence of vertical integration. This decisional vacuum entails the functional necessity of a central planner who will decide on the rationing scheme. It is shown that this result may help to highlight some of the key theoretical and empirical issues of economic reform. One of its main implications is that, in an economy where vertical integration is weak, the abolition of imperative planning can hardly be successful if shortages are not suppressed at the same time. On the other hand, it is much easier to abolish imperative planning if the economy is highly vertically integrated but, because vertical integration destroys the competitive nature of markets, the main goals of economic reform cannot be fulfilled unless additional structural changes are introduced in order to create a competitive environment.

Résumé

Résumé

Depuis toujours, les économies de type soviétique connaissent une tendance spontanée à l'intégration verticale, en réponse à l'incertitude de l'approvisionnement dans une économie de pénuries chroniques.

Ce texte examine le lien entre intégration verticale et réforme. On montre que, dans un contexte institutionnel à prix fixes et pénurie d'inputs, en l'absence d'intégration verticale, les entreprises consommant ces inputs n'arriveront pas à se mettre d'accord sur un schéma de rationnement. Ce vide décisionnel implique la nécessité d'un planificateur central qui décide du schéma de rationnement. Ce résultat permet d'éclairer certaines des questions essentielles de la réforme économique. Une des implications principales est que, dans une économie faiblement verticalement intégrée, il est impossible de supprimer la planification impérative sans supprimer simultanément les pénuries. D'un autre côté, il est beaucoup plus facile d'abolir la planification impérative si l'économie est verticalement intégrée. Cependant, comme l'intégration verticale supprime la nature compétitive des marchés, les objectifs principaux de la réforme ne peuvent être réalisés si des changements de structures ne sont pas introduits afin de créer un environnement compétitif.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Mathias Dewatripont, Francoise Forges, Janos Kornai, Peter Mihalyi, Khalid Sekkat, Ariane Szafarz and Jean Waelbroeck for their helpful remarks and suggestions.

References

Arrow, K. (1975), Vertical Integration and Communication, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 6 no 1, pp. 173183.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. (1983), The Hungarian Alternative to Soviet-Type Planning, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 304316.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. (1987), Reforming or Perfectioning the Economic Mechanism, European Economic Review, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 132138.Google Scholar
Belkin, V., Medvedev, P. and Nit, I (1988), Sfera obrashtsheniia: puti radikal'noï reformy, Kommunist, no 14, pp. 3539.Google Scholar
Blois, K.J. (1972), Vertical quasi-integration, Journal of Industrial Economies, vol. 20 no 3, pp. 253272.Google Scholar
DuchêNe, G. (1975), Essai sur la logique de l'economie planifiée soviétique (1965-1975), unpublished Ph. D., Paris 1.Google Scholar
Dyker, D. (1983), The Process of Investment in the Soviet Union, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glichev, A.V. (1985), Kachestvo produktsii i intensifikatsiia, Voprosy ekonomiki, no 6, pp. 4150.Google Scholar
Gomulka, S. (1986), Growth, Innovation and Reform in Eastern Europe, London, Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Gorlin, A.C. (1985), The Power of Soviet Industrial Ministries in the 1980s, Soviet Studies, vol. 37, no 3, pp. 353370.Google Scholar
Granick, D. (1954), Management of the Industrial Firm in the USSR, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, P. (1989), The Current State of Soviet Economic Reforms, NATO Colloquium on Soviet Economic Reforms: Implementation under Way, Brussels.Google Scholar
Karagedov, R.G. (1983), Ob organizatsionnoï strukture upraveniia promyshlennostiu, EKO, no 8, pp. 5069.Google Scholar
Kontorovich, V. (1988), Lessons of the 1965 Soviet Economic Reform, Soviet Studies, vol. 40, no 2, pp. 308316.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. (1980), Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. and Martos, B. (ed.), (1980), Non price Control, Amsterdam, North Holland.Google Scholar
Lavigne, M. (1979), Les économies socialistes soviétique et européennes, Ed. Collin, A., second edition.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (1987), Réflexions pour une théorie de la transition, paper presented in Paris at the conference L'URSS en transition: 1975-1985.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (1988), Product Quality in a Soviet-Type Economy, European Economic Review, vol. 32, no 1, pp. 129140.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (1989a), Economie politique du système soviétique, Paris, L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (1989b), Shortage, vertical integration and reform in Soviet-type economies, discussion paper 8908, Centre d'Economie Mathématique et d'Econométrie, Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (1990), Complexity, Bounded Rationality and Equilibrium, Journal of Comparative Economics, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trotsky, , (1964), The Age of Permanent Revolution: in: Deuscher, I (ed.), A. Trotsky Anthology.Google Scholar
Weinrich, G. (1984), On the Theory of Effective Demand under Stochastic Rationing, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 34, no 1, pp. 95115.Google Scholar
Wiles, P. (1964), The Political Economy of Communism, Oxford, Basil Black-well.Google Scholar
Zorkal'Tsev, V. I. (1982), Anatomiia defitsita: voprosy bez otveta”, EKO no 2, pp. 8494.Google Scholar