Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:16:27.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SMELL OF SOPHOKLES' SALMONEUS: TECHNOLOGY, SCATOLOGY, METATHEATRE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2014

Robert Cowan
Robert Cowan*
Affiliation:
University of Sydneybob.cowan@sydney.edu.au
Get access

Extract

Virtually nothing is known for certain about Sophokles' satyr play Salmoneus. However, a number of extremely probable deductions may be made on the basis of the few surviving fragments and the mythographic testimony about its eponymous villain (the iconographical record is totally unhelpful, or almost so). This article adds some further suggestions about the implications of the three most substantial fragments, which, if they do not quite share that level of extreme probability, it is hoped have a high degree at least of plausibility, and some significance for (meta-)dramatic and thematic aspects of the play as a whole. I shall argue that a reference to the malodorous quality of the thunderbolt draws attention to the gross physicality of the thunder-machine or bronteion (βροντεῖον) which Salmoneus has invented and constructed out of ox-hides. This has both a metatheatrical dimension, since the bronteion was probably part of the stage-machinery of 5th-century drama, and a thematic one, since it emphasises the low, corporeal nature of Salmoneus' thunder in contrast to the sublime weapon of Zeus which it imperfectly mimics. The established parallelism between thunder and farting adds another level to the debasing of Salmoneus’ invention and concomitant deflation of his pretensions. Finally, I shall suggest that another fragment relating to the sympotic game of kottabos may have drawn a similarly deflating parallel between the hurling of the wine-lees and that of the tyrant's ersatz thunderbolts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , June 2014 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnott, P. (1962), Greek Scenic Conventions in the Fifth Century B.C. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Barrett, J. (2002), Staged Narrative: Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Borthwick, E.K. (1964), ‘The Gymnasium of Bromius’, JHS 84, 49-53.Google Scholar
Calder, W.M. III (1958), ‘The Dramaturgy of Sophocles' Inachus ’, GRBS 1, 137-55 = B. Seidensticker (ed.), Satyrspiele (Darmstadt 1989), 134-53.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. (2004), ‘Il Filottete di Sofocle: Neottolemo recita a soggetto’, Dioniso n.s. 3, 52-65.Google Scholar
Cook, A.B. (1903), ‘Zeus, Juppiter, and the Oak’, CR 17, 268-78.Google Scholar
Csapo, E., and Slater, W.J. (1994), The Context of Ancient Drama (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Dobrov, G.W. (2001), Figures of Play: Greek Drama and Metafictional Poetics (Oxford/New York).Google Scholar
Dunn, F. (2011), ‘Metatheatre and Crisis in Euripides’ Bacchae and Sophocles' Oedipus at Colonus ’, in Markantonatos, A and Zimmermann, B (eds.), Crisis on Stage: Tragedy and Comedy in Late Fifth-Century Athens (Berlin/New York), 359-75.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1996), Theatrical Space and Historical Place in Sopocles' Oedipus at Colonus (Lanham MD).Google Scholar
Faulkner, T.M. (1993), ‘Making a Spectacle of Oneself: The Metatheatrical Design of Sophocles’ Ajax ’, Text and Presentation 14, 35-40.Google Scholar
Faulkner, T.M. (1998), ‘Containing Tragedy: Rhetoric and Self-Representation in Sophocles’ Philoctetes ’, ClAnt 17, 25-58.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1979), ‘Δῖνος in Aristophanes and Euripides’, CJ 74, 356-59.Google Scholar
Gardner, E.A. (1899), ‘Vase in Chicago Representing the Madness of Athamas’, AJA 3, 331-44.Google Scholar
Green, J.R. (1994), Theatre in Ancient Greek Society (London).Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2006a), ‘Sophocles’ Satyr-plays and the Language of Romance’, in De Jong, I.J.F. and Rijksbaron, A. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Language (Leiden), 51-72.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2006b), ‘Satyrs, Citizens, and Self-Presentation’, in Harrison (2006), 161-99.Google Scholar
Griffith, R.D. (2008), ‘Salmoneus’ Thunder-Machine Again (Apollod. Bibl. 1.9.7)’, Philologus 152, 143-45.Google Scholar
Guggisberg, P. (1947), Das Satyrspiel (Zürich).Google Scholar
Harrison, G.W.M. (ed.) (2006), Satyr Drama: Tragedy at Play (Swansea).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1991), The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy 2 (Oxford) [orig. publ. New Haven & London 1975].Google Scholar
Hošek, R. (1962), Lidovost a lidové motivy u Aristofana (Prague).Google Scholar
Jouan, F. (1991), ‘Sophocle et le drame satyrique’, Pallas 37, 7-23.Google Scholar
Kaimio, M., et al. (2001), ‘Metatheatricality in the Greek Satyr Play’, Arctos 35, 35-78.Google Scholar
Kittmer, J. (1995), ‘Sophoclean Sophistics: A Reading of Philoktetes ’, MD 34, 9-35.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1990), ‘An Anthropology of Euripides’ Kyklops’, in Winkler and Zeitlin (1990), 207-27.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. (1994), Euripidea (Leiden).Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1999), Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece (Princeton).Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2009), ‘“The Players Will Tell All”: The Dramatist, the Actors and the Art of Acting in Sophocles' Philoctetes ’, in Goldhill, S. and Hall, E. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Tragic Tradition (Cambridge), 48-68.Google Scholar
Lee, K.H. (ed.) (1976), Euripides, Troades (Basingstoke/London).Google Scholar
Lilja, S. (1972), The Treatment of Odours in the Poetry of Antiquity (Helsinki).Google Scholar
Lissarague, F. (1990), ‘Why Satyrs are Good to Represent’, in Winkler and Zeitlin (1990), 228-36.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed.) (1996), Sophocles: Fragments (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (2006), ‘The Sophisticated Cyclops’, in Harrison (2006), 103-17.Google Scholar
Olson, S.D. (ed.) (1998), Aristophanes, Peace (Oxford).Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. (2000), ‘Satyr and Image in Aeschylus’ Theoroi ’, CQ 50, 353-66.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. (2006), ‘Of Sophists, Tyrants, and Polyphemos: The Nature of the Beast in Euripides’ Cyclops', in Harrison (2006), 119-59.Google Scholar
Palutan, M.H. (1996), ‘La parodia del cottabo nei Σύνδειπνοι di Sofocle e negli Ὀστολόγοι di Eschilo’, SIFC 14, 10-27.Google Scholar
Pearson, A.C. (ed.) (1917), The Fragments of Sophocles Vol. II (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2011), Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco–Roman Art, Literature and Religion (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1953), ‘πορδή’, RE 22.235-40.Google Scholar
Radt, S. (ed.) (1977), Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta Vol. 4: Sophocles (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Ringer, M. (1998), Electra and the Empty Urn: Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles (Chapel Hill).Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1903), ‘Zur Ödipussage’, Apophoreton: Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner 47 (Berlin), 100-15.Google Scholar
Roisman, H.M. (2001), ‘The Ever-Present Odysseus: Eavesdropping and Disguise in Sophocles' Philoctetes ’, Eranos 99, 38-53.Google Scholar
Scaife, R. (1992), ‘From Kottabos to War in Aristophanes' Acharnians ’, GRBS 33, 25-35.Google Scholar
Scheurer, S., and Bielfeldt, R. (eds.) (1999), ‘Sophokles Salmoneus ’, in Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., and Seidensticker, B. (eds.), Das griechische Satyrspiel (Darmstadt), 381-87.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. (ed.) (1984), Euripides, Cyclops (Oxford).Google Scholar
Shaw, C.A. (2010), ‘Middle Comedy and the “Satyric” Style’, AJP 131, 1-22.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (1994), ‘Salmoneus’, LIMC VII.653-655.Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. (2002), Spectator Politics: Metatheatre and Performance in Aristophanes (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Smith, R.S., and Trzaskoma, S. (2005), ‘Apollodorus 1.9.7: Salmoneus’ Thunder-Machine’, Philologus 149, 351-54.Google Scholar
Sutton, D.F. (1975), ‘Athletics in the Greek Satyr Play’, RSC 23, 203-09.Google Scholar
Sutton, D.F. (1980), The Greek Satyr Play (Meisenheim am Glan).Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1977), The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Torrance, I. (2013), Metapoetry in Euripides (Oxford).Google Scholar
Ussher, R.G. (1978), Euripides Cyclops: Introduction and Commentary (Rome).Google Scholar
Voelke, P. (2001), Un théâtre de la marge: aspects figuratifs et configurationnels du drame satyrique dans l'Athènes classique (Bari).Google Scholar
West, S. (1984), ‘Io and the Dark Stranger (Sophocles, Inachus F 269a)’, CQ 34, 292-302.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (2000), The Athenian Institution of the Khoregia: The Chorus, the City and the Stage (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Winkler, J.J., and Zeitlin, F.I. (eds.) (1990), Nothing to do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context (Princeton).Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2008), Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2005), Euripides' Escape-Tragedies: A Study of Helen, Andromeda, and Iphigenia among the Taurians (Oxford).Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2006a), ‘ Orestes, a Euripidean Sequel’, CQ 56, 33-47.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2006b), ‘ Cyclops and the Euripidean Tetralogy’, CCJ 52, 23-48.Google Scholar