Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Reference methodologies for radioactive controlled discharges an activity within the IAEA’s program environmental modelling for radiation safety II (EMRAS II)

  • J. Barescut, D. Lariviere, T. Stocki, T.J. Stocki (a1), D.M. Telleria (a2), L. Bergman (a1), G. Proehl (a2), V. Amado (a3), I. Bonchuk (a4), P. Boyer (a5), P. Chyly (a6), A. Curti (a3), R. Heling (a7), V. Kliaus (a8), P. Krajewski (a9), G. Latouche (a10), D.C. Lauria (a11), C. Mourlon (a5), L. Newsome (a12), L. Sági (a13) and J. Smith (a14)...

Abstract

In January 2009, the IAEA EMRAS II (Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety II) program was launched. The goal of the program is to develop, compare and test models for the assessment of radiological impacts to the public and the environment due to radionuclides being released or already existing in the environment; to help countries build and harmonize their capabilities; and to model the movement of radionuclides in the environment. Within EMRAS II, nine working groups are active; this paper will focus on the activities of Working Group 1: Reference Methodologies for Controlling Discharges of Routine Releases. Within this working group environmental transfer and dose assessment models are tested under different scenarios by participating countries and the results compared. This process allows each participating country to identify characteristics of their models that need to be refined. The goal of this working group is to identify reference methodologies for the assessment of exposures to the public due to routine discharges of radionuclides to the terrestrial and aquatic environments. Several different models are being applied to estimate the transfer of radionuclides in the environment for various scenarios. The first phase of the project involves a scenario of nuclear power reactor with a coastal location which routinely (continuously) discharges 60Co, 85Kr, 131I, and 137Cs to the atmosphere and 60Co, 137Cs, and 90Sr to the marine environment. In this scenario many of the parameters and characteristics of the representative group were given to the modellers and cannot be altered. Various models have been used by the different participants in this inter-comparison (PC-CREAM, CROM, IMPACT, CLRP POSEIDON, SYMBIOSE and others). This first scenario is to enable a comparison of the radionuclide transport and dose modelling. These scenarios will facilitate the development of reference methodologies for controlled discharges.

Copyright

References

Hide All
[1][1]Punt, A., Kruse, P. and Titley, J. G., Radiological assessment – British Energy Sizewell B. Authorisation review 2005/6, post-consultation amended version. Environment Agency report reference NMA/TR/2006/05a (2006).
[2][2]Clyne, F. J., Tipple, J. R. and McTaggart, K. A., Radiological habits survey: Sizewell, 2005. Cefas report reference RL02/06 (2006).
[3][3]Ryan J. et al. Guidelines for calculating derived release limits for radioactive material in airborne and liquid effuents for normal operation of nuclear facilities. Canadian Standards Association document N288.1-08. Mississauga (2008).
[4][4]International Atomic Energy Agency Generic Models for Use in assessing the Impact of Discharges of Radioactive Substances to the Environment, IAEA Safety Series No. 19, IAEA Vienna (2001).
[5][5]Brookhaven National Laboratory. National Nuclear Data Centre NuDat 2 website http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2
[6][6]International Atomic Energy Agency Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Temperate Environments. Technical Report Series 364 IAEA Vienna (1994).
[7][7]Stocki, T.J. et al. Radioprotection 44 (2009) 735-739.
[8][8]Pasquill, F. Atmospheric Diffusion: The dispersion of Windborne Material from Industrial and other sources, Van Nostrand Co., London (1962).
[9][9]Smith, J.G. and Simmonds J.R. (editors). The methodology for assessing the radiological consequences of routine releases of radionuclides to the environment used in PC-CREAM 08, HPA-RPD-058 (2009).
[10][10]Simmonds, J.R, Lawson G., and Mayall A. Methodology for assessing the radiological consequences of routine releases of radionuclides to the environment. Radiation Protection 72. Report EUR 15760 (1995).
[11][11]Gonze M.A., Garcia-Sanchez, Boyer P., Mourlon C., Tamponnet C. SYMBIOSE: A modeling and simulation platform for environmental chemical risk assessment. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation (SPEIR 3) held in Darwin, Australia, 22–26 July 2002. ISBN 92-0-103603-5. IAEA 2003, pp. 266-274.
[12][12]Lepicard. S., Heling R., Maderich, V. (2002) POSEIDON/RODOS for radiological assessment of marine environment after accidental releases: application to coastal areas of the Baltic, Black and North Seas. Proceedings of International Symposium on “on situ Measurements as a tool for radioecology. IRE Conference, Fleurus, Belgium, 10-12 June 2002
[13][13]Heling R. Koziy L. Bulgakov V. Radioprotection 37 (2002) C1-833-C1-838.
[14][14]Heling, R, Bezhenar R. Radioprotection 44 (2009) 741-746.
[15][15]Krajewski P., et al. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part A 66 (2008) 1730-1735.

Reference methodologies for radioactive controlled discharges an activity within the IAEA’s program environmental modelling for radiation safety II (EMRAS II)

  • J. Barescut, D. Lariviere, T. Stocki, T.J. Stocki (a1), D.M. Telleria (a2), L. Bergman (a1), G. Proehl (a2), V. Amado (a3), I. Bonchuk (a4), P. Boyer (a5), P. Chyly (a6), A. Curti (a3), R. Heling (a7), V. Kliaus (a8), P. Krajewski (a9), G. Latouche (a10), D.C. Lauria (a11), C. Mourlon (a5), L. Newsome (a12), L. Sági (a13) and J. Smith (a14)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed