Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:20:32.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UCLA Radiocarbon Dates X

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Rainer Berger  and
Jonathon Ericson
Rainer Berger
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Departments of Anthropology and Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Jonathon Ericson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The measurements reported in this date list form the chronometric framework for obsidian hydration and trade studies in California (Ericson, 1975; 1977; 1978; 1981; Ericson et al, 1975; Singer and Ericson, 1977). All samples were analyzed as CO2 gas at close to 1 atm in a 7.5L proportional counter with three energy channels. Radiocarbon ages are based by convention on the 5568 ± 30 yr half-life. The biospheric standard is 95% the count rate of NBS oxalic acid for radiocarbon laboratories. Background is based on CO2 obtained from marble. Counter operation is checked against a historically dated wood sample from the funerary boat of Sesostris III, 1872 +4−8 BC (Hayes, 1962). All samples were subjected to accepted NaOH, HCl or other special chemical treatments to exclude contamination. No tree-ring calibration was applied to any of the samples listed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 1983 , pp. 129 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Ericson, J E, 1975, New results in obsidian hydration dating: World Archaeology, v 7, p 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, J E, ms, 1977, Prehistoric exchange systems in California: The results of obsidian dating and tracing: unpub PhD dissert, Dept Anthropol, UCLA, 395 P.Google Scholar
Ericson, J E, 1978, Obsidian hydration dating in California: Soc California Archaeol, no. 2, p 43–52.Google Scholar
Ericson, J E, 1981, Exchange and production systems in California prehistory: British Archaeol Repts, Internatl ser 110, 240 P.Google Scholar
Ericson, J E and Berger, Rainer, 1975, Late Pleistocene American obsidian tools: Nature, v 249, p 824–825.Google Scholar
Ericson, J E, Hagan, T A, and Chesterman, C W, 1976, Prehistoric obsidian sources in California I: Geological and geographical aspects, in Taylor, R E, ed, Advances in obsidian glass studies, Park Ridge, New Jersey, Noyes Press, p 218–239.Google Scholar
Ericson, J E, Makishima, A, MacKenzie, J D, and Berger, Rainer, 1975, Chemical and physical properties of obsidian: A naturally occurring glass: Jour Non-Crystalline Solids, v 17, p 129–142.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D, 1969, Technological change, population movement, environment adaptation, and the emergence of trade: Inferences on culture change suggested by midden constituent analysis: UCLA Archaeol Survey ann rept, v 11, p 105–125.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, D, 1973, Early cultures of the North Coast Ranges, California: PhD dissert, Dept Anthropol, Univ California, Davis. puter programs: Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 391–439.Google Scholar
Hayes, W C, 1962, Chronology: Egypt — to the end of the twentieth dynasty, in Edwards, I E S, Gadd, C J, and Hammond, N G L, eds, Cambridge Ancient History: Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Press, p 1–23.Google Scholar
Jackson, D, 1975, Stepwise regression: BMDP2R, in Dixon, W J, ed, Biomedical computer programs: Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 391–439.Google Scholar
McNitt, J R, 1968, Geology of the Kelseyville quadrangle, Sonoma, Lake and Mendocino Counties: California Div Mines and Geol, map sheet no. 9.Google Scholar
Meighan, C W and Haynes, C V, 1970, The Borax Lake site, revisited: Science v 167, p 1213–1221.Google Scholar
Singer, C A and Ericson, J E, 1977, Quarry analysis at Bodie Hills, Mono County, California: A case study, in Earle, T K and Ericson, J E, eds, Exchange systems in prehistory, New York, Academic Press, p 171–188.Google Scholar