Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:56:25.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Lumps from Aerial Lime Mortars and Plasters: Methodological Issues and Results from San Nicolò of Capodimonte Church (Camogli, Genoa, Italy)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

G Pesce ,
G Quarta ,
L Calcagnile ,
M D'Elia ,
P Cavaciocchi ,
C Lastrico  and
R Guastella
G Pesce*
Affiliation:
Institute of the History of Material Culture (ISCUM), 35r, Sarzano Square, 16128 Genoa, Italy
G Quarta
Affiliation:
CEDAD, Centre for Dating and Diagnostics, Department of Engineering of Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
L Calcagnile
Affiliation:
CEDAD, Centre for Dating and Diagnostics, Department of Engineering of Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
M D'Elia
Affiliation:
CEDAD, Centre for Dating and Diagnostics, Department of Engineering of Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
C Lastrico
Affiliation:
Institute of the History of Material Culture (ISCUM), 35r, Sarzano Square, 16128 Genoa, Italy
*
Corresponding author. Email: gianluca.pesce@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper deals with the potentialities and technical and methodological issues associated with the use of lumps of not completely melted lime as material suitable for the radiocarbon dating of aerial lime mortars and plasters. In fact, the identification and selection of single aggregates of unmelted lumps allows one to reduce the possible contamination resulting from external sources of carbon such as “14C-dead” limestone in sand added to the mixture during preparation. This procedure results in the possibility for accurate 14C determinations from single pieces of masonry, supplying important information about the construction phases of historical buildings. The potential of this approach is shown by presenting the results of the archaeological study on the walls of San Nicolò of Capodimonte church (Camogli, Genoa, Italy), where this technique has been successfully applied to obtain absolute ages of different parts of the building. The obtained results were then compared with the information gathered from historical sources and with stratigraphic and other archaeological studies.

Type
How to Improve Chronologies of Archaeological Sites
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2009 , pp. 867 - 872
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Berger, R. 1992. 14C dating mortar in Ireland. Radiocarbon 34(3):880–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Calcagnile, L, Quarta, G, D'Elia, M. 2005. High resolution accelerator based mass spectrometry: precision, accuracy and background. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 62(4):623–9.Google Scholar
Fieni, L. 2002. La Basilica di San Lorenzo Maggiore a Milano tra età tardoantica e medioevo: metodologie di indagine archeometrica per lo studio dell'elevato. Archeologia dell'Architettura VII:51–98.Google Scholar
Folk, RL, Valastro, S Jr. 1976. Successful technique for dating of lime mortar by carbon-14. Journal of Field Archaeology 3(2):203–8.Google Scholar
Gallo, N. 2001. 14C e archeologia del costruito: il caso di Castello Aghinolfi (MS). Archeologia dell'Architettura VI:31–6.Google Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Jungner, H, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, von Konow, T, Rud, N. 1997. AMS 14C dating of lime mortar. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123:487–95.Google Scholar
Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Braskén, M, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, Á. 2007. Mortar dating using AMS 14C and sequential dissolution: examples from medieval, non-hydraulic lime mortars from the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Radiocarbon 49(1):47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawrocka, D, Michniewicz, J, Pawlyta, J, Pazdur, A. 2005. Application of radiocarbon method for dating of lime mortars. Geochronometria 24:109–15.Google Scholar
Pachiaudi, C, Marechal, J, Van Strydonck, M, Dupas, M, Dauchot-Dehon, M. 1986. Isotopic fractionation of carbon during CO2 absorption by mortar. Radiocarbon 28(2A):691–7.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Hale, J, Heinemeier, J, Lancaster, L, Lindroos, A. 2003. Dating ancient mortar. American Scientist 91(2):130–7.Google Scholar
Sonninen, E, Jungner, H. 2001. An improvement in preparation of mortar for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 43(2A):271–3.Google Scholar
Tubbs, LE, Kinder, TN. 1990. The use of AMS for the dating of lime mortars. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 52(3–4):438–41.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Dupas, M, Dauchot-Dehon, M, Pachiaudi, C, Maréchal, J. 1986. The influence of contaminating (fossil) carbonate and the variations of δ13C in mortar dating. Radiocarbon 28(2A):702–10.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, van der Borg, K, De Jong, AFM, Keppens, E. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of lime fractions and organic material from buildings. Radiocarbon 34(3):873–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar