Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:00:41.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Isotopic Composition of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon in Rivers and Shallow Groundwater: A Diagrammatic Approach to Process Identification and A More Realistic Model of the Open System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

C. B. Taylor*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd., P.O. Box 31–312, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Rivers and shallow groundwater are deep groundwater precursors. Their dissolved inorganic carbon content (DIC) and its isotopic composition are end members in the evolution of these properties in confined situations, and are therefore essential information when applying carbon isotopes as tracers of groundwater processes and determining aquifer residence times using 14C.

During studies of regional aquifer systems in New Zealand, a simple model has been developed to explain the isotopic compositions of DIC encountered in rivers and shallow groundwater. The model format incorporates a diagrammatic approach, providing a framework for tracing the subsequent evolution of DIC in both precipitation- and river-recharged aquifers under closed conditions.

DIC concentration of rivers continuously adjusts toward chemical and isotopic equilibrium between direct addition of CO2 to the water (via plant respiration and decay of dead organic material) and exchange of CO2 across the river-air interface. In the shallow groundwater situation, the gaseous reservoir is soil CO2, generally at significantly higher partial pressure. In both cases, calcite dissolution or other processes may be an additional source of DIC directly added to the bicarbonate and dissolved CO2 components; while these may add or remove DIC, steady-state isotopic concentrations are considered to be determined only by the dynamic balance between directly added CO2 and gas exchange. This model allows the calculation of steady states, using selectable parameters in river or groundwater situations. These appear as straight lines in 13C or 14C vs. 1/DIC, or total 14C vs. DIC plots, into which the experimental data can be inserted for interpretation. In the case of 14C, the steady-state balance is very often complicated by the presence of an old component in the directly added DIC; the understanding achieved via the 13C patterns is helpful in recognizing this.

Data from four contrasting aquifer systems in New Zealand. The success of the approach has depended crucially on DIC concentrations measured very accurately on the isotope samples, rather than separate chemical analyses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Craig, H. 1957 Isotopic standards for carbon and oxygen and correction factors for mass spectrometric analysis of carbon dioxide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 12: 113149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, S. 1992 Reaction path formulation of a simple dissolution model for radiocarbon dating groundwater. In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 34 (3): 646653.Google Scholar
Coplen, T. B. 1994 Reporting of stable hydrogen, carbon and oxygen abundances. Pure and Applied Chemistry 66: 24232444.Google Scholar
Drever, J. I. 1997 The Geochemistry of Natural Waters . 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.: 436 p.Google Scholar
Fontes, J.-Ch. and Garnier, J.-M. 1979 Determination of the initial 14C activity of the total dissolved carbon: A review of the existing models and a new approach. Water Resources Research 15: 399413.Google Scholar
Geyh, M. A. 1992 The 14C time-scale of groundwater. In Isotopic Techniques in Water Resources Development 1991 . Vienna, IAEA: 167177.Google Scholar
Mook, W. G. 1980 Carbon-14 in hydrogeological studies. In Fritz, P. and Fontes, J.-Ch., eds., Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry . Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.: 4774.Google Scholar
Münnich, K. O. 1957 Messung des 14C-Gehaltes von hartem Grundwasser. Naturwissenschaften 44: 3234.Google Scholar
Pearson, F. J. Jr. and Swarzenki, W. V. 1974 14C evidence for the origin of arid region groundwater, North Eastern Province, Kenya. In Isotopes in Groundwater Hydrology 1974 . Vol. 2. Vienna, IAEA: 95109.Google Scholar
Plata, A., Baonza, E., and Silgado, A. 1984 Hidrologia isotópica de las aguas subterráneas del Parque Nacional Doñana y zona de influencia. In Isotope Hydrology 1983: Proceedings of an International Symposium on Isotope Hydrology in Water Resources Development . Vienna, IAEA: 321340.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, U. and Münnich, K. O. 1981 13C/12C fractionation during CO2 transfer from air to sea. In Bolin, B., ed., Carbon Cycle Modelling . SCOPE Report 16. Chicester, England, John Wiley & Sons: 249257.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355363.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. B. 1994 Hydrology of the Poverty Bay flats aquifers, New Zealand: Recharge mechanisms, evolution of the isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic carbon, and ground water ages. Journal of Hydrology 158: 151185.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. B. and Fox, V. J. 1996 An isotopic study of dissolved inorganic carbon in the catchment of the Waimakariri River and deep ground water of the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology 186: 181190.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. B., Fox, V. J., Brown, L. J. and Bekesi, G. (ms.) 1997 Environmental isotopes applied in a study of the hydrogeology of the Manawatu aquifers, North Island, New Zealand. Submitted to Journal of Hydrology .Google Scholar
Taylor, C. B., Wilson, D. D., Brown, L. J., Stewart, M. K., Burden, R. J. and Brailsford, G. W. 1989 Sources and flow of North Canterbury Plains ground water, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology 106: 311340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar