Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Gas Proportional Versus Liquid Scintillation Counting, Radiometric Versus AMS Dating

  • Páll Theodórsson (a1)

Abstract

I discuss here the basis of a comparison of methods for radiocarbon dating and introduce a new index for the relative merit of a system, factor of counting capacity, that is generally more appropriate than the commonly used factor of merit. The merit of a dating system cannot be based on a single figure but other factors must also be considered. A comparison of the gas proportional, liquid scintillation and accelerator mass spectrometry technique is presented that for gas proportional counters is based on a multi-detector system rather than a single detector.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gas Proportional Versus Liquid Scintillation Counting, Radiometric Versus AMS Dating
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gas Proportional Versus Liquid Scintillation Counting, Radiometric Versus AMS Dating
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gas Proportional Versus Liquid Scintillation Counting, Radiometric Versus AMS Dating
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Damon, P (ms) 1989 Radiocarbon dating techniques: TAMS versus Quantulus. In preparation.
Hut, G, Kayser, J and Wijma, S 1983 A multiple proportional 14C counter system for milligram-sized samples. in Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 11th, Proc. Radiocarbon 25(2): 547552.
Jelen, K and Geyh, MA 1986 A low-cost miniature counter system for radiocarbon dating. in Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc. Radiocarbon 28(2A): 578585.
Mäntynen, P, Äikää, O, Kankainen, T and Kaihola, L 1987 Application of pulse-shape discrimination to improve the precision of the carbon-14 gas-proportional-counting method. Appl Radiat Isot 38(10): 869873.
Mook, WG and Streurman, HJ 1983 Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. PACT 8: 3156.
Nydal, R, Gulliksen, S and Lövseth, K 1975 Proportional counters and shielding for low level gas counting. in Povinec, P, ed, Internatl conference on Low-radioactivity: measurements and applications. High Tatras, Proc: 77-84.
Oeschger, H and Wahlen, M 1975 Low level counting technique. Ann Rev Nuclear Sci: 423463.
Otlet, RL, Huxtable, G and Sanderson, DCW 1986 The development of practical systems for 14C measurement of small samples using miniature counters. in Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc. Radiocarbon 28(2A): 603614.
Polach, H, Calf, G, Harkness, D, Hogg, A, Kaihola, L and Robertson, S 1988 Performance of new technology liquid scintillation counters for 14C dating. Nuclear Geophysics 2.
Robinson, SW 1976 Radiocarbon dating at the US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California. in Berger, R and Suess, HE, eds, Radiocarbon dating. Internatl 14C conf, 9th, Proc. Berkeley, Univ California Press: 268-273.
Robinson, SW and Trimble, DA 1981 US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, radiocarbon measurements II. Radiocarbon 23(2): 305321.
Schoch, H, Bruns, M, Münnich, KO and Münnich, M 1980 A multi-counter system for high precision carbon-14 measurements. in Stuiver, M and Kra, RS, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc. Radiocarbon 22(2): 442447.
Tans, PP, de Jong, AFM, Mook, WG and Hut, G 1982 High accuracy carbon-14 counting and the application to the radiocarbon calibration curve. in Povinec, P, ed, Conference on low-level counting, 2nd, Proc. Bratislava: 155-169.
Watt, DE and Ramsden, D 1964 High sensitivity counting technique. London, Pergamon Press: 2.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed