Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:20:50.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Freshwater Reservoir and Radiocarbon Dates on Cooking Residues: Old Apparent Ages or a Single Outlier? Comments on Fischer and Heinemeier (2003)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

John P Hart  and
William A Lovis
John P Hart
Affiliation:
Research and Collections Division, New York State Museum, 3140 Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230, USA. Email: jph_nysm@mail.nysed.gov
William A Lovis
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and MSU Museum, 354 Baker Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. Email: lovis@msu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fischer and Heinemeier (2003) present a hypothesis that the freshwater reservoir effect produces old apparent ages for radiocarbon dates run on charred cooking residues in regions where fossil carbon is present in groundwater. The hypothesis is based in part on their analysis of dates on charred cooking residues from 3 inland archaeological sites in Denmark in relation to contextual dates from those sites on other materials. A critical assessment of the dates from these sites suggests that rather than a pattern of old apparent dates, there is a single outlying date—not sufficient evidence on which to build a case for the freshwater reservoir effect.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , 2007 , pp. 1403 - 1410
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Borić, D, Miracle, P. 2004. Mesolithic and Neolithic (dis)continuities in the Danube Gorges: new AMS dates from Padina and Hajdučka Vodenica (Serbia). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 23(4):341–71.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Carr, C, Haas, H. 1996. Beta-count and radiocarbon dates of Woodland and Fort Ancient period occupations in Ohio 1350 BC–AD 1650. West Virginia Archaeologist 48(1–2): 19–53.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2004. Radiocarbon dates from the Ulong site in Palua and implications for western Micronesean prehistory. Archaeology in Oceania 39:26–33.Google Scholar
Clark, JGD. 1948. The development of fishing in prehistoric Europe. Antiquaries Journal 28:46–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, CE. 1982. The inland shore fishery of the northern Great Lakes: its development and importance in prehistory. American Antiquity 47(4):761–84.Google Scholar
Cook, GT, Bonsall, C, Hedges, REM, McSweeney, K, Boroneant, V, Bartosiewicz, L, Pettitt, PB. 2002. Problems of dating human bones from the Iron Gates. Antiquity 76(291):77–85.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM. 2001. The archaeology of aquatic adaptations: paradigms for a new millennium. Journal of Archaeological Research 9(4):287–350.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. 2002. Food or feasting? An evaluation of explanations of the neolithisation of Denmark and southern Sweden. In: Fischer, A, Kristiansen, K, editors. The Neolithisation of Denmark: 150 Years of Debate. Sheffield: JR Collins Publications. p 343–93.Google Scholar
Fischer, A, Heinemeier, J. 2003. Freshwater reservoir effect in 14C dates of food residue on pottery. Radiocarbon 45(3):449–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyh, MA, Schotterer, U, Grosjean, M. 1998. Temporal changes of the 14C reservoir effect in lakes. Radiocarbon 40(2):921–31.Google Scholar
Goodsite, ME, Rom, W, Heinemeier, J, Lange, T, Ooi, S, Appleby, PG, Shotyk, W, van der Knaap, WO, Lohse, C, Hansen, TS. 2001. High-resolution AMS 14C dating of post-bomb peat archives of atmospheric pollutants. Radiocarbon 43(2B):495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, JP, Brumbach, HJ. 2003. The death of Owasco. American Antiquity 68(4):737–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, JP, Brumbach, HJ. 2005. Cooking residues, AMS dates, and the Middle-to-Late Woodland transition in central New York. Northeast Anthropology 69:1–33.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Lovis, WA. 2007. A multi-regional analysis of AMS and radiometric dates from carbonized food residues. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 32(2):201–60.Google Scholar
Kuzmin, YV, Keally, CT. 2001. Radiocarbon chronology of the earliest Neolithic sites in East Asia. Radiocarbon 43(2B):1121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovis, WA. 1990a. Accelerator dating the ceramic assemblage from the Fletcher site: implications of a pilot study for interpretation of the Wayne period. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 15(3):37–50.Google Scholar
Lovis, WA. 1990b. Curatorial considerations for systematic research collections: AMS dating of a curated ceramic assemblage. American Antiquity 55(2):382–7.Google Scholar
Mason, RJ. 1966. Two Stratified Sites on the Door Peninsula of Wisconsin. Anthropological Papers Number 26. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, BK. 2005. New dates for New Deal excavated Monongahela villages in Somerset County. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 75(3):49–61.Google Scholar
Means, BK. 2006. Circular reasoning: drawing on models of ring-shaped village spatial layouts to examine villages in late Prehistoric Pennsylvania [PhD dissertation]. Tempe: Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Moseley, ME, Feldman, RA. 1988. Fishing, farming, and the foundations of Andean civilization. In: Bailey, J, Parkington, J, editors. The Archaeology of Prehistoric Coastlines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 125–34.Google Scholar
Nakamura, T, Taniguchi, Y, Tsuji, S, Oda, H. 2001. Radiocarbon dating of charred residues on the earliest pottery in Japan. Radiocarbon 43(2B):1129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plew, MG. 1996. Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Fishing Strategies. Boise: Department of Anthropology, Boise State University. 214 p.Google Scholar
Rau, C. 1884. Prehistoric Fishing in Europe and North America. Contributions to Knowledge 25. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Scott, EM. 2003. The Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (FIRI). Radiocarbon 45(2):135–290.Google Scholar
Shott, MJ. 1992. Radiocarbon dating as a probabilistic technique: the Childers site and Late Woodland occupation in the Ohio Valley. American Antiquity 57(2):202–30.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(3):215–30.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW. 2005. CALIB 5.0. [WWW program and documentation]. URL: http://calib.qub.ac.uk/calib/.Google Scholar
Ward, GK, Wilson, SR. 1978. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critical review. Archaeometry 20(3):19–31.Google Scholar
Yesner, DR. 1979. Maritime hunter-gatherers: ecology and prehistory. Current Anthropology 21:727–50.Google Scholar