Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Early Iron Age Radiometric Dates from Tel Dor: Preliminary Implications for Phoenicia and Beyond

  • Ayelet Gilboa (a1) and Ilan Sharon (a1)

Abstract

The absolute date of the Iron Age I and IIa periods in Israel, and by inference in the Southern Levant at large, are to date among the hottest debated issues in Syro-Palestinian archaeology. As there are no pegs of absolute chronology throughout this range, conventional chronology had been established on proposed correlations of the material record with events and social phenomena as portrayed in historical and literary sources, chiefly the Hebrew Bible. With the growing impact of so-called “revisionist” notions in Biblical studies, which to various extents question the historicity of the Bible, it is imperative to try to establish a chronological framework for the Iron I–IIa range that is independent of historical and so forth considerations, inter alia in order to be able to offer an independent archaeological perspective of the biblical debate. The most obvious solution is to attempt a radiocarbon-based chronology. This paper explores the possible implications of a sequence of 22 radiometric dates obtained from a detailed Iron I–IIa stratigraphic/ceramic sequence at Tel Dor, on Israel's Mediterranean coast. To date, this is the largest such sequence from any single early Iron Age site in Israel. Having been part of the Phoenician commercial sphere in the early Iron Age, Dor offers a variegated sequence of ceramics that have a significant spatial distribution beyond Phoenicia, and thus transcend regional differences and enable correlation with the surrounding regions. By and large, the absolute dates of these ceramics by the Dor radiometric chronology are up to a century lower than those established by conventional Palestinian ceramic chronology. The ramifications of the lower Dor dates for some Phoenician, Israelite, and Cypriot early Iron Age archaeological issues are explored.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Early Iron Age Radiometric Dates from Tel Dor: Preliminary Implications for Phoenicia and Beyond
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Early Iron Age Radiometric Dates from Tel Dor: Preliminary Implications for Phoenicia and Beyond
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Early Iron Age Radiometric Dates from Tel Dor: Preliminary Implications for Phoenicia and Beyond
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Email: gilboaaa@internet-zahav.net.

References

Hide All
Albright, WF. 1950. Some oriental glosses on the Homeric problem. American Journal of Archaeology 54: 162–76.
Aubet, ME. 1993. The Phoenicians and the west. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ben-Tor, A, Ben-Ami, D. 1998. Hazor and the archaeology of the tenth century BCE. Israel Exploration Journal 48:137.
Bikai, PM. 1983. The imports from the east. In: Karageorghis, V. Palaepaphos-Skales. An Iron Age cemetery in Cyprus. Ausgrabungen in Alt-Paphos auf Cypern 3. Konstanz: Deutches archäologisches Institut. p 396405.
Bikai, PM. 1994. The Phoenicians and Cyprus. Proceedings of the international symposium Cyprus in the 11th century BC, Nicosia 30–31 October, 1993. Nicosia: Leventis Foundation. p 31–7.
Bronk-Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and the analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.
Carmi, I, Segal, D. 2000. Radiocarbon dates. In: Finkelstein, I, Ussishkin, D, Halpern, B, editors. Megiddo III: The 1992–1996 seasons (Tel Aviv University Institute of Archaeology Monograph Series 18). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. p 502–3.
Cahill, J. 1998. David's Jerusalem, fiction or reality? It's there, archaeological evidence proves it. Biblical Archaeology Review 24(4):3441.
Coldstream, JN. 1999. On chronology: the CG II mystery and its sequel. In: Iacovou, M, Michaelides, D, editors. Cyprus: the historicity of the Geometric horizon. Nicosia: University of Cyprus. p 109–18.
Cross, FM. 1980. Newly found inscriptions in old Canaanite and early Phoenician scripts. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 238:120.
Dever, WG. 1999. Histories and nonhistories of Ancient Israel. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 316: 89105.
Finkelstein, I. 1996. The archaeology of the United Monarchy: an alternative view. Levant XXVIII: 177–87.
Finkelstein, I. 1998a. Bible archaeology or archaeology of Palestine in the Iron Age? A rejoinder. Levant XXX: 167–73.
Finkelstein, I. 1998b. Notes on the stratigraphy and chronology of Iron Age Taanach. Tel Aviv 25:208–18.
Finkelstein, I. 1999. Hazor and the north in the Iron Age, a low chronology perspective. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 314:5570.
Gilboa, A. 1989. New finds at Tel Dor and the beginning of Cypro-Geometric pottery import to Palestine. Israel Exploration Journal 39:204–18.
Gilboa, A. 1998. Iron I–IIA pottery evolution at Dor—regional contexts and the Cypriot connection. In: Gitin, S, Mazar, A, Stern, E, editors. Mediterranean peoples in transition, thirteenth to early tenth centuries BCE, in honor of Professor Trude Dothan. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society. p 413–25.
Gilboa, A. 1999a. The dynamics of Phoenician Bichrome pottery: a view from Tel Dor. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 316:122.
Gilboa, A. 1999b. The view from the east—Tel Dor and the earliest Cypro-Geometric exports to the Levant. In: Iacovou, M, Michaelides, D, editors. Cyprus—the historicity of the Geometric horizon. Nicosia: University of Cyprus. p 119–39.
Ilan, D. 1999. Northeastern Israel in the Iron Age I: cultural, socio-economic, and political perspectives. [PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University].
Karageorghis, V. 1982. Cyprus—from the Stone Age to the Romans. London: Thames and Hudson.
Karageorghis, V. 1983. Palaepaphos-Skales. An Iron Age cemetery in Cyprus. Ausgrabungen in Alt-Paphos auf Cypern 3. Konstanz: Deutches Archäologisches Institut.
Mazar, A. 1990. Archaeology of the Land of the Bible 10,000–586 B.C.E. The Anchor Bible Reference Library. New York: Doubleday.
Mazar, A. 1997. Iron Age chronology—A reply to Israel Finkelstein. Levant XXIX: 157–67.
Mazar, A. 1999. The 1997–1998 excavations at Tel Rehov: preliminary report. Israel Exploration Journal 49:142.
Mazar, A. 2001. Radiocarbon dates from Iron Age strata at Tel Beth Shean and Tel Rehov. Radiocarbon. This issue.
Muhly, JD. 1970. Homer and the Phoenicians. Berytus 19:1964.
Naveh, J. 1982. The early history of the alphabet. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
Negbi, O. 1992. Early Phoenician presence in the Mediterranean islands. American Journal of Archaeology 96:599615.
Peuch, E. 1983. Présence Phénicienne dans les iles a la fin du IIe millenaire. Revue Biblique 90:365–95.
Sass, B. 1991. On the origin and early history of the northwest Semitic, south Semitic, and Greek alphabets. Freiburg: Universitatsverlag Freiburg Schweiz.
Sharon, I. 2001. Transition dating–a heuristic mathematical approach to the collation of 14C dates from stratified sequences. Radiocarbon. This issue.
Sharon, I, Gilboa, A. 1997. Dor in the Iron I period, a port and trading emporium under cultural and economic changes. In: Regev, E, editor. New studies on the coastal plain. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University. p 1233. In Hebrew.
Stepansky, Y, Segal, D, Carmi, I. 1996. The 1993 sounding at Tel Sasa: excavation report and radiometric dating. 'Atiqot XXVIII:6376.
Stern, E. 1990. New evidence from Dor for the first appearance of the Phoenicians along the northern coast of Israel. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 279:2733.
Stern, E. 1991. Phoenicians, Sikils, and Israelites in the light of recent excavations at Dor. In: Lipinski, E, editor. Studia Phoenicia XI: Phoenicia and the Bible. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 44. Leuven: Departement Oriëntalistiek and Uitgeverij Peeters. p 8594.
Stern, E. 1999. New finds from Dor concerning the establishment of the first Phoenician city-state at the site. Eretz-Israel 26 (Frank Moore Cross volume):176–85. In Hebrew. 234*–35* English summary.
Stern, E. 2000. Dor—ruler of the seas. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.
Zarzeki-Peleg, A. 1997. Hazor, Jokneam, and Megiddo in the tenth century BCE. Tel Aviv 24:258–87.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed