Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:35:51.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A different kind of story: Pedagogy of hope at The Ration Shed Museum, Cherbourg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Carly Smith*
Affiliation:
Carly.Smith@usq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

In recounting the history of Cherbourg as an Aboriginal settlement, the Ration Shed Museum presents some traumatic narratives. It paints a picture of violent geographic and cultural dislocation, crude living conditions, forced labour and administrative oppression by infusing historical artefacts with the personal recollections of Cherbourg residents. The intent behind the Ration Shed Museum itself, however, is something quite different: its curators want to tell a story that speaks of hope for this community’s future, and to work towards some form of reconciliation. They do this by actively engaging with the ‘terrible gift’ of the past in the present, and by providing spaces for encounters that can lead to open discussions of difficult social issues and celebrations of contemporary Cherbourg life. This article draws on ethnographic interviews and observational data alongside the theoretical work of Roger I. Simon and Andrea Witcomb to describe how the Ration Shed Museum engages its community and visitors in a dual process of both understanding Cherbourg’s history and reframing traumatic narratives to enact a pedagogy of hope.

Type
Museums and engagement in Queensland: Critical contributions to the field
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Interview

Morgan, Sandra and Simpson, Ada 2016. Interview with Carly Smith, 17 May.Google Scholar

References

Banivanua Mar, T. and Edmonds, P. (eds) 2010. Making settler colonial space: Perspectives on race, place and identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baum, R.N. 2000. ‘Never to forget: Pedagogical memory and second-generation witness’. In Simon, R.I., Rosenberg, S. and Eppert, C. (eds), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. 1995. The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Besley, J. 2016. ‘“Speaking to, with and about”: Cherbourg women’s memory of domestic work as activist counter-memory’. Continuum 30(3), 316–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, T. 2001. A dumping ground: A history of the Cherbourg settlement. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Bonnell, J. and Simon, R.I. 2007. ‘“Difficult” exhibitions and intimate encounters’. Museum and Society 5(2), 65–17.Google Scholar
Booth, W.J. 2006. Communities of memory: On witness, identity, and justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chinnery, A. 2010. ‘“What good does all this remembering do, anyway?” On historical consciousness and the responsibility of memory’. In Biesta, G. (ed.), Philosophy of Education. Chicago, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, pp. 397405.Google Scholar
Chinnery, A. 2013. ‘Caring for the past: On relationality and historical consciousness’. Ethics and Education 8(3), 253–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, V. 2012. ‘Disorderly narratives, public pedagogies and reconciliation’. In Ahluwalia, P., Atkinson, S., Bishop, P., Christie, P., Hattam, R. and Matthews, J. (eds), Reconciliation and pedagogy. London: Routledge, pp. 95117.Google Scholar
Crowley, V. and Matthews, J. 2006. ‘Museum, memorial and mall: Postcolonialism, pedagogies, racism and reconciliation’. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 14(3), 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelglass, W. 2006. ‘Levinas on suffering and compassion’. Sophia 45(2), 3955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, E. 2002. ‘The US Holocaust Museum as a scene of pedagogical address’. Symploke 10(1–2), 1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppert, C. 2000. ‘Relearning questions: Responding to the ethical address of past and present others’. In Simon, R.I., Rosenberg, S. and Eppert, C. (eds), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 213–30.Google Scholar
Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Freire, P. 1998. Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Freire, P. 2014. Pedagogy of hope: Reliving ‘pedagogy of the oppressed’: With notes by Ana Maria Araujo Freire. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Giroux, H.A. 1997. Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture and schooling: A critical reader. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hall, S. 1996. ‘The question of cultural identity’. In Hall, S., Held, D., Hubert, D. and Thompson, K. (eds), Modernity: An introduction to modern societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 595632.Google Scholar
Hall, S. 1997. ‘Introduction’. In Hall, S. (ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage, pp. 111.Google Scholar
Hall, S. 2013. ‘Introduction: Who needs “identity”?’ In Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds), Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage, pp. 117.Google Scholar
hooks, b. 2003. Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2000. Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kidd, R. 1997. The way we civilise: Aboriginal affairs — the untold story. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 2015. ‘“Inside the museum”: Curating between hope and despair — POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews’. East European Jewish Affairs 45(2–3), 215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. and Milton, C.E. 2011. ‘Introduction: Witnesses to witnessing’. In Lehrer, E., Milton, C. and Patterson, M.E. (eds), Curating difficult knowledge: Violent pasts in public places. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Madison, D.S. 2005. Critical ethnography: Method, ethics and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Paolantonio, M.D. 2015. ‘Roger Simon as a thinker of the remnants: An overview of a way of thinking the present, our present …Studies in Philosophy and Education 34(3), 263–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ration Shed Museum. 2018. ‘About Cherbourg’. Ration Shed Museum. http://rationshed.com.au/about-cherbourg, viewed 10 February 2018.Google Scholar
Rothberg, M. 2009. Multidirectional memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. 2015. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. 1905. Reason in common sense (vol. 1). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Seixas, P. (ed.) 2004. Theorizing historical consciousness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Silvén, E. and Björklund, A. 2006. ‘Detecting difficulty’. In Silvén, E. and Björklund, A. (eds), Difficult matters: Objects and narratives that disturb and affect. Stockholm: Nordiska Museets Förlag, pp. 248–64.Google Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2000. ‘The paradoxical practice of Zakhor: Memories of “what has never been my fault or deed”’. In Simon, R.I., Rosenberg, S. and Eppert, C. (eds), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 926.Google Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2004. ‘The pedagogical insistence of public memory’. In Seixas, P. (ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 183200.Google Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2005. The touch of the past: Remembrance, learning and ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2006. ‘The terrible gift: Museums and the possibility of hope without consolation’. Museum Management and Curatorship 21(3), 187204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2011a. ‘Afterword: The turn to pedagogy: A needed conversation on the practice of curating difficult knowledge’. In Lehrer, E., Milton, C. and Patterson, M.E. (eds), Curating difficult knowledge: Violent pasts in public places. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 193209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2011b. ‘A shock to thought: Curatorial judgment and the public exhibition of “difficult knowledge”’. Memory Studies 4(4), 432–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2012. ‘Museums, civic life, and the educative force of remembrance’. In Carbonell, B. M. (ed.), Museum studies: An anthology of contexts (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp. 92–6.Google Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2014. A pedagogy of witnessing: Curatorial practice and the pursuit of social justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Simon, R.I. 2016. ‘The terrible gift: Difficult memories for the twenty-first century’. In Butler, S.R. and Lehrer, E. (eds), Curatorial dreams: Critics imagine exhibitions. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 172–86.Google Scholar
Simon, R.I., Rosenberg, S. and Eppert, C. 2000. ‘Introduction: Between hope and despair: The pedagogical encounter of historical remembrance’. In Simon, R.I. Rosenberg, S. and Eppert, C. (eds), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 2014. ‘Post-modernising the museum: The Ration Shed’. Historical Encounter 1(1), 3249.Google Scholar
Spradley, J.P. 1979. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Thorp, R. 2014, ‘Towards an epistemological theory of historical consciousness’. Historical Encounters 1(1), 2031.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. ‘Interpreting material culture’. In Pearce, S.M. (ed.), Interpreting objects and collections. London: Routledge, pp. 6775.Google Scholar
Veracini, L. 2010. Settler colonialism: A theoretical overview. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. 2012. ‘The memorial museum identity complex: Victimhood, culpability, and responsibility’. In Carbonell, B.M. (ed.), Museum studies: An anthology of contexts (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 97115.Google Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2003. Re-imagining the museum: Beyond the mausoleum. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2013. ‘Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums’. Museum Management and Curatorship 28(3), 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2014. ‘“Look, listen and feel”: The First Peoples exhibition at the Bunjilaka Gallery, Melbourne Museum’. Thema La revue des Museées de la civilisation 1, 4962.Google Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2015a. ‘Cross-cultural encounters and “difficult heritage” on the Thai–Burma railway: An ethics of cosmopolitanism rather than practices of exclusion’. In Logan, W. Craith, M.N., and Kockel, U. (eds), A companion to heritage studies. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 461–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2015b. ‘Cultural pedagogies in the museum: Walking, listening and feeling’. In Watkins, M. Noble, G. and Driscoll, C. (eds), Cultural pedagogies and human conduct. London: Routledge, pp. 158–70.Google Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2015c. ‘Thinking about others through museums and heritage’. In Waterton, E. and Watson, S. (eds), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 130–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcomb, A. 2015d. ‘Toward a pedagogy of feeling: Understanding how museums create a space for cross-cultural encounters’. In Witcomb, A. and Message, K. (eds.), Museum theory: An expanded field. Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 321–44.Google Scholar
Wolfe, P. 1999. Settler colonialism and the transformation of anthropology: The politics and poetics of an ethnographic event. London: Cassell.Google Scholar