Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:30:56.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Dating of Soil Organic Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Yang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 108 Hilgard Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720
Ronald Amundson
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 108 Hilgard Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720
Susan Trumbore
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, 92717

Abstract

Radiocarbon ages of soil organic matter are evaluated with a model which incorporates the dynamics of the 14C content of soil organic matter. Measured 14C ages of soil organic matter or its fractions are always younger than the true ages of soils due to continuous input of organic matter into soils. Differences in soil C dynamics due to climate or soil depth will result in significantly different 14C signatures of soil organic matter for soils of the same age. As a result, the deviation of the measured 14C age from the true age of soil formation could differ significantly among different soils or soil horizons. Our model calculations also suggest that 14C ages of soil organic matter will eventually reach a steady state provided that no climatic or ecological perturbations occur. Once a soil or a soil horizon has reached a steady state, 14C dating of soil organic matter will provide no useful information regarding the age of the soil. However, for soils in which steady state has not been reached, it is possible to estimate the age of soil formation by modeling the measured 14C contents of soil organic matter. Radiocarbon dating of buried soils could, in general, overestimate the true age of the burial by as much as the steady-state age of the soil or soil horizon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, C. A. Paul, E. A. Rennie, D. A., and McCallum, K. J. (1967a). Factors affecting the accuracy of the carbon dating method of analysis to soil humus studies. Soil Science 104 , 8184.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. A. Paul, E. A. Rennie, D. A., and McCallum, K. J. (1967b). Applicability of the carbon-dating method of analysis to soil humus studies. Soil Science 104, 217227.Google Scholar
Chapelle, F. (1993). “Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry.” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A. E., and Brovkin, V. A. (1991). A model of humua formation in soils based on radiocarbon data of natural ecosystems. In “International Radiocarbon conference, Tucson, Arizona.” Radiocarbon 33, 186187.Google Scholar
Gerasimova, I. P., and Chichagova, O. A. (1971). Some problems in the radiocarbon dating of soil. Soviet Soil Sciences 3, 519527.Google Scholar
Gilet-Blein, N. Marien, G., and Evin, J. (1980). Unreliability of 14C dates from organic matter of soils. Radiocarbon 22 , 919929.Google Scholar
Goh, K. M., and Stout, J. D. (1972). Radiocarbon enrichment and the turnover of soil organic matter in a chronosequence of soils developed on wind-blown sand in New Zealand. In “Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating,” Vol. 1, pp. 449463.Google Scholar
Goh, K. M. Rafter, T. A. Stout, J. D., and Walker, T. W. (1976). The accumulation of soil organic matter and its carbon isotope content in a chronosequence of soils developed on aeolian sand in New Zealand. Journal of Soil Science 27 , 89100.Google Scholar
Goh, K. M. Molloy, B. P. J., and Rafter, T. A. (1977). Radiocarbon dating of Quaternary loess deposits, Banks Peninsula, Canterbury, New Zealand. Quaternary Research 7, 177196.Google Scholar
Goh, K. M. (1991). Carbon Dating. In “Carbon Isotope Techniques” (Coleman, D. C. and Fry, B., Eds.), pp. 125145. Academic Press, San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant-Taylor, T. L. (1972). The extraction and use of plant lipids as a material for radiocarbon dating. In “Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating,” Vol. 1, pp. 439447.Google Scholar
Hammond, A. P. Goh, K. M., and Tonkin, P. J. (1991). Chemical pretreatments for improving the radiocarbon dates of peats and organic silts in a gley podzol environment: Grahams Terrace, North Westland. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 34 , 191194.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. Broecker, W., and Bonani, G. (1993). A strategy for estimating the impact of CO2 fertilization on soil carbon storage. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7 , 6980.Google Scholar
Hass, H., and Dalbey, T. (1991). Absolute radiocarbon chronology of the Aubrey Clovis site, Texas, based on soil humate stratigraphy. Radiocarbon 33 , 204.Google Scholar
Herrera, R., and Tamers, M. A. (1971). Radiocarbon dating of tropical soil associations in Venezuela. In “Paleopedology—Origin,Nature and Dating of Paleosols” (Yaalon, D. H., Ed.), pp. 109115. International Society of Soil Science and Israel Univ. Press. Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S. (1969). Radiocarbon dating of soil organic matter. In “Rothamsted Experimental Station—Report for l968’” p.73.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D. S., and Raynor, J. H. (1977). The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Science 123 , 298305.Google Scholar
Martel, Y. A., and Paul, E. A. (1974). The use of radiocarbon dating of organic matter in the study of soil genesis. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding 38 , 501506.Google Scholar
Martin, C. W., and Johnson, W. C. (1995). Variation in radiocarbon ages of soil organic matter fractions from Late Quaternary buried soils. Quaternary Research 43 , 232237.Google Scholar
O’Brien, B. J., and Stout, J. D. (1977). Movement and turnover of soil organic matter as indicated by carbon isotope measurements. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 10 , 309317.Google Scholar
Paul, E. A. Campbell, C. A. Rennie, D. A., and McCallum, K. J. (1964). Investigations of the dynamics of soil humus utilizing carbon dating techniques. In “8th International Congress of Soil Science Transactions,” pp. 201208.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. M. S. Willis, E. H., and Hodge, D. A. H. (1964). Dating of humus podzols by residual radiocarbon activity. Nature 202 , 165166.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H. W. (1971a). Radiocarbon dating of soils. Soviet Soil Sciences 3, 7683.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H. W. (1971b). Radiocarbon dating of soils-problems, troubles, hopes. In “Paleopedology—Origin,Nature and Dating of Paleosols” (Yaalon, D. H., Ed.), pp. 7787. International Society of Soil Science and Israel Univ. Press, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H. W. (1972). Natural radiocarbon measurement on soil organic matter fractions and on soil profiles of different pedogenesis. In “Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating,” Vol. 1, pp. 382394.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H. W. (1976). Soil fraction dating. In “Radiocarbon Dating” (Berger, R. and Suess, H. E., Eds.), pp. 277283. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H. W., and Becker-Heidmann, P. (1991). 25 years of radiocarbon dating soils: a paradigm of erring and learning. Radiocarbon 33, 238.Google Scholar
Sheppard, J. C. Ali, S. Y., and Mehringer, P. J. Jr., (1976). Radiocarbon dating of organic components of sediments and peats. In “Radiocarbon Dating” (Berger, R. and Suess, H. E., Eds.), pp. 284305. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stout, J. D., and O’Brien, B. J. (1972). Factors affecting radiocarbon enrichment in soil and the turnover of soil organic matter. Radiocarbon 1 , 394407.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Polach, H. (1977). Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19 , 355363.Google Scholar
Tate, K. R. (1972). Radiocarbon dating in studies of soil organic matter vegetation relationships. In “Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Radiocarbon Dating, Wellington, New Zealand,” pp. 408419.Google Scholar
Tornqvist, T. E. De Jong, A. F. M. Osterbaan, W. A., and Van der Borg, K. (1991). New perspectives for radiocarbon dating organic deposits by accelerator mass apectrometry. Radiocarbon 33 , 251.Google Scholar
Trumbore, S. E. Vogel, J. S., and Southon, J. R. (1989). AMS 14C measurements of fractionated soil organic matter: an approach to decipering the soil carbon cycle. Radiocarbon 31 , 644654.Google Scholar
Trumbore, S. E. Bonani, G., and Wolfli, W. (1990). The rates of carbon cycling in several soils from AMS 14C measurements of fractionated soil organic matter. In “Soils and the Greenhouse Effect” (Bouwman, A. F., Ed.), pp. 405414. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Trumbore, S. E. (1993). Comparison of carbon dynamics in tropical and temperate soils using radiocarbon measurements. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7 , 275290.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. McDonald, E. Amundson, R. McFadden, L., and Chadwick, O. (in press). “An Isotopic Study of Soils in Chronological Sequences of Alluvial Deposits, Providence Mountains, California.” Geological Society of America Bulletin.Google Scholar