Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:37:54.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quaternary chronostratigraphy and stable isotope paleoecology of Big Bone Lick, Kentucky, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kenneth Barnett Tankersley ,
Madhav Krishna Murari ,
Brooke E. Crowley ,
Lewis A. Owen ,
Glenn W. Storrs  and
Litsa Mortensen
Kenneth Barnett Tankersley
Affiliation:
Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
Madhav Krishna Murari*
Affiliation:
Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
Brooke E. Crowley
Affiliation:
Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
Lewis A. Owen
Affiliation:
Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
Glenn W. Storrs
Affiliation:
Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA Cincinnati Museum Center, Cincinnati, OH 45203, USA
Litsa Mortensen
Affiliation:
Quaternary and Anthropocene Research Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Fax: + 1 513 556 5784. E-mail address:murarimk@ucmail.uc.edu (M.K. Murari).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Big Bone Lick (BBL) in northern Kentucky, USA has been a critical geologic site in the historical development of North American Quaternary vertebrate paleontology since the 1700s. Sedimentology, geoarcheology, paleontology, accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence dating, and stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses were undertaken to develop a chronostratigraphy and history of erosion and deposition for the site to provide a foundation for understanding taphonomy, and species extinction and adaptation to periods of climatic and environmental change. Three geomorphic surfaces are recognized at BBL representing significant periods of floodplain aggradation since the last glacial maximum (26.5–19 ka) dating to the Oldest Dryas (Tazewell, 25–19 ka), the Older Dryas (Cary, 14–12 ka), and late Holocene (5 ka to the present). Unconformities suggest significant periods of degradation during the transitions from cold and dry to warm and moist climates from the Oldest Dryas (Tazewell) to Bølling Oscillation, from the Older Dryas (Cary) to the Allerød, and from the Younger Dryas (Valders) to the Holocene Climatic Optimum. Increased anthropogenic activities since ~ 5 ka may have increased soil upland erosion and floodplain aggradation. Stable isotopes demonstrate that the landscape has been dominated by C 3 vegetation since the last glacial maximum.

Keywords

Vertebrate fossilsStable isotopesOptically stimulated luminescence datingRadiocarbon datingSedimentology
Type
Original Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 479 - 487
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cerling, T.E., Harris, J.M. (1999). Carbon isotope fractionation between diet and bioapatite in ungulate mammals and implications for ecological and paleoecological studies. Oecologia 120, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowley, B.E., Wheatley, P.V. (2014). To bleach or not to bleach: assessing carbon and oxygen isotope variation among apatite preparation techniques. Chemical Geology 381, 234–242.Google Scholar
Crowley, B.E., Godfrey, L.R., Irwin, M.T. (2011). A glance to the past: subfossils, stable isotopes, seed dispersal, and lemur species loss in Southern Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology 73, 25–37.Google Scholar
Dalbey, T.S. (1992). Geological Aspects of Key Archaeological Sites in Northern Kentucky and Southern Ohio. Department of Geological Survey, Columbus.Google Scholar
Drooker, P.B. (1997). The View from Madisonville: Protohistoric Western Fort Ancient Interaction Patterns. Museum of Anthropology Memoirs, No. 31 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Gill, J.L., Williams, J.W., Jackson, S.T., Donnelly, J.P., Schellinger, G.C. (2012). Climatic and megaherbivory controls on late-glacial vegetation dynamics: a new, high-resolution, multi-proxy record from Silver Lake, Ohio. Quaternary Science Reviews 34, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, H.H. (1984). Archaeological sedimentology of overbank silt deposition on the floodplain of the Ohio River near Louisville, Kentucky. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 11, 421–432.Google Scholar
Grun, R. (2009). The “AGE” program for the calculation of luminescence age estimates. Ancient TL 27, 45–46.Google Scholar
Handley, L.L., Austin, A.T., Robinson, D., Scrimgeour, C.M., Raven, J.A., Heaton, T.H.E., Schmidt, S., Stewart, G.R. (1999). The 15N natural abundance of δ15N of ecosystem samples reflects measures of water availability. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26, 185–199.Google Scholar
Heaton, T.H.E. (1999). Spatial, species, and temporal variations in the 13C/12C ratios of C 3 plants: implications for palaeodiet studies. Journal of Archaeological Science 26, 637–649.Google Scholar
Hedeen, S. (2008). Big Bone Lick: The Cradle of American Paleontology. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington.Google Scholar
Heusser, L., Maenza-Gmelch, T., Lowell, T., Hinnefeld, R. (2002). Late Wisconsin periglacial environments of the southern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet reconstructed from pollen analyses. Journal of Quaternary Science 17, 773–780.Google Scholar
Ives, P.C., Levin, B., Oman, C.L., Rubin, M. (1967). U.S. geological survey radiocarbon dates IX. Radiocarbon 9, 505–529.Google Scholar
Jain, M., Singhvi, A.K. (2001). Limits to depletion of blue-green light stimulated luminescence in feldspars: implications for quartz dating. Radiation Measurements 33, 883–892.Google Scholar
Krasinski, K.E. (2010). Broken Bones and Cutmarks: Taphonomic Analyses and Implications for the Peopling of North America. Ph.D. dissertationDepartment of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Levin, B., Ives, P.C., Oman, C.L., Rubin, M. (1965). U.S. geological survey radiocarbon dates VIII. Radiocarbon 7, 372–398.Google Scholar
Lewis, R.B. (1996). Kentucky Archaeology. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Andersen, J.J., Williams, J.W., Jackson, S.T. (2013). Vegetation history in central Kentucky and Tennessee (USA) during the last glacial and deglacial periods. Quaternary Research 79, 189–198.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J.Z., Longstaffe, F.J., Ballenger, J.A.M., Haynes, C.V.J. (2011). Isotopic paleoecology of Clovis mammoths from Arizona. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 17916–17920.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J.Z., Longstaffe, F.J., Hodgins, G. (2013). Proboscideans and paleoenvironments of the Pleistocene Great Lakes: landscape, vegetation, and stable isotopes. Quaternary Science Reviews 76, 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, L.A. (2013). The Chronostratigraphy of Big Bone Lick, Kentucky and Its Archaeological Implications. M.A, thesisDepartment of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, .Google Scholar
Murray, A.S., Wintle, A.G. (2000). Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32, 57–73.Google Scholar
Murray, A.S., Wintle, A.G. (2003). The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability. Radiation Measurements 37, 377–381.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, K.J., Fry, B. (1988). Controls on natural Nitrogen-15 and Carbon-13 abundances in forest soil organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52, 1633–1640. 10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200060024x.Google Scholar
Porart, N. (2006). Use of magnetic separation for purifying quartz for luminescence dating. Ancient TL 24, 33–36.Google Scholar
Potter, P.E. (1996). Exploring the Geology of the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Region. Kentucky Geological Survey, Lexington.Google Scholar
Ray, L.L. (1974). Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology of the Glaciated Ohio River Valley — A Reconnaissance Study. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 826.Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C.E., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffman, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Scott, M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M., van der Plicht, J. (2013). IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887.Google Scholar
Schultz, C.B., Tanner, L.G., Whitmore, F.C., Ray, L.L., Crawford, E.C. (1963). Paleontological investigations at Big Bone Lick State Park, Kentucky: a preliminary report. Science 142, 29 1167–1169.Google Scholar
Storrs, G.W., Genheimer, R.A., Hedeen, S.E. (2009). In the Footsteps of Lewis and Clark – New Zooarchaeological Excavation at Big Bone Lick, Kentucky. 9th North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts 3, Cincinnati Museum Center Scientific Contributions, 236.Google Scholar
Swadley, W.C. (1969). Geologic Map of the Union Quadrangle, Boone County, Kentucky. United States Geological Survey, Washington D.C..Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (1985). The potential for early man sites at Big Bone Lick, Kentucky. Tennessee Anthropologist 10, 27–49.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (1986). Bison exploitation by the Fort Ancient peoples of the central Ohio Valley. North American Archaeologist 7, 289–303.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (1987). Big Bone Lick: A Clovis site in northcentral Kentucky. Current Research in the Pleistocene 4, 36–37.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (1990). The Paleoindian Period. Pollack, D. The Archaeology of Kentucky: Past Accomplishments and Future Directions Kentucky Heritage Council Press, Frankfort.75–144.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (1996). Ice Age Hunters and Gatherers. Lewis, R.B. Kentucky Archaeology University of Kentucky Press, 21–38.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (2002). In Search of Ice Age Americans. Gibbs Smith Publishers Press, Layton, Utah.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (2007). Big Bone Lick, Kentucky: Late Pleistocene Archaeology. Dalbey, T.S. Geological Aspects of Key Archaeological Sites in Northern Kentucky and Southern Ohio Ohio Geological Survey, Columbus.46–50.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B. (2009). Late Pleistocene Paleontology and Archaeology of Big Bone Lick, Kentucky. Brett, Carl North American Paleontological Convention Field Trip Guide 95–124.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B., Munson, P.J., Tankersley, J.R. (1983). The archaeological geology of the Whitewater–Great Miami–Ohio River Valley. Abstracts with Programs, 96th Annual Meeting 15, Geological Society of America, 704.Google Scholar
Tankersley, K.B., Waters, M., Stafford, Y. (2009). Clovis and the American Mastodon at Big Bone Lick, Kentucky. American Antiquity 74, 558–567.Google Scholar
Vogel, J.C., Talma, A.S., Hall-Martin, A.J., Viljoen, P.J. (1990). Carbon and nitrogen isotopes in elephants. South African Journal of Science 86, 147–150.Google Scholar
Widga, C. (2006). Niche variability in late Holocene bison: a perspective from Big Bone Lick, KY. Journal of Archaeological Science 33, 1237–1255.Google Scholar
Wintle, A.G., Murray, A.S. (2006). A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiation Measurements 41, 369–391.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tankersley et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Tankersley et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.9 KB