Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:48:31.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival of the cheapest: how proteome cost minimization drives evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2020

Kasper P. Kepp Open the ORCID record for Kasper P. Kepp [Opens in a new window]
Kasper P. Kepp*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, DTU Chemistry, Kemitorvet 206, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
*
Author for correspondence: Kasper P. Kepp, E-mail: kpj@kemi.dtu.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Darwin's theory of evolution emphasized that positive selection of functional proficiency provides the fitness that ultimately determines the structure of life, a view that has dominated biochemical thinking of enzymes as perfectly optimized for their specific functions. The 20th-century modern synthesis, structural biology, and the central dogma explained the machinery of evolution, and nearly neutral theory explained how selection competes with random fixation dynamics that produce molecular clocks essential e.g. for dating evolutionary histories. However, quantitative proteomics revealed that selection pressures not relating to optimal function play much larger roles than previously thought, acting perhaps most importantly via protein expression levels. This paper first summarizes recent progress in the 21st century toward recovering this universal selection pressure. Then, the paper argues that proteome cost minimization is the dominant, underlying ‘non-function’ selection pressure controlling most of the evolution of already functionally adapted living systems. A theory of proteome cost minimization is described and argued to have consequences for understanding evolutionary trade-offs, aging, cancer, and neurodegenerative protein-misfolding diseases.

Keywords

Amino acid costevolutionmetabolismprotein misfoldingprotein turnover
Type
Major Review
Information
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics , Volume 53 , 2020 , e7
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczyk, A. J., Cao, J., Kamerlin, S. C. L. and Warshel, A. (2011). Catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase and other enzymes arises from electrostatic preorganization, not conformational motions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 14115–14120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akashi, H (2003) Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics 164, 1291–1303.Google ScholarPubMed
Akashi, H and Gojobori, T (2002) Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 3695–3700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, SG and Kurland, CG (1990) Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 54, 198–210.Google ScholarPubMed
Attwell, D and Laughlin, SB (2001) An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 21, 1133–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badaloo, A, Jackson, AA and Jahoor, F (1989) Whole body protein turnover and resting metabolic rate in homozygous sickle cell disease. Clinical Science 77, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajaj, M and Blundell, T (1984) Evolution and the tertiary structure of proteins. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering 13, 453–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Even, A, Noor, E, Savir, Y, Liebermeister, W, Davidi, D, Tawfik, DS and Milo, R (2011) The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry 50, 4402–4410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, MD, Delneri, D, Oliver, SG, Rattray, M and Bergman, CM (2010) Evolutionary systems biology of amino acid biosynthetic cost in yeast. PLoS ONE 5, e11935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basan, M, Hui, S, Okano, H, Zhang, Z, Shen, Y, Williamson, JR and Hwa, T (2015) Overflow metabolism in Escherichia coli results from efficient proteome allocation. Nature 528, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, M, Schmidt, A, Malmstroem, J, Claassen, M, Ori, A, Szymborska, A, Herzog, F, Rinner, O, Ellenberg, J and Aebersold, R (2011) The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Molecular Systems Biology 7, 549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belle, A, Tanay, A, Bitincka, L, Shamir, R and O'Shea, EK (2006) Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 13004–13009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benaroudj, N, Zwickl, P, Seemüller, E, Baumeister, W and Goldberg, AL (2003) ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation. Molecular Cell 11, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blankenship, RE (1992) Origin and early evolution of photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 33, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, JD and Adami, C (2003) Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein–protein interactions data sets. BMC Evolutionary Biology 3, 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, JD and Adami, C (2004) Evolutionary rate depends on number of protein–protein interactions independently of gene expression level: response. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, JD, Wilke, CO, Arnold, FH and Adami, C (2004) Stability and the evolvability of function in a model protein. Biophysical Journal 86, 2758–2764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, JD, Drummond, DA, Arnold, FH and Wilke, CO (2006 a) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 1751–1761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, JD, Labthavikul, ST, Otey, CR and Arnold, FH (2006 b) Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 5869–5874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blundell, TL and Wood, SP (1975) Is the evolution of insulin Darwinian or due to selectively neutral mutation? Nature 257, 197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boltzmann, L (1886) Der zweite Hauptsatz der mechanischen Warmetheorie. In der feierlichen Sitzung der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29. Mai 1886. Vienna: Gerold, p. 21.Google Scholar
Bonet, J, Wehrle, S and Schriever, K, Yang, C, Billet, A, Sesterhenn, F, Scheck, A, Sverrisson, F, Veselkova, B, Vollers, S, Lourman, R, Villard, M, Rosset, S, Krey, T and Correia, BE (2018) Rosetta FunFolDes – a general framework for the computational design of functional proteins. PLoS Computational Biology 14, e1006623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouzat, JL (2010) Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history. Conservation Genetics 11, 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, GC (1991) Total cell protein concentration as an evolutionary constraint on the metabolic control distribution in cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology 153, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JH, Marquet, PA and Taper, ML (1993) Evolution of body size: consequences of an energetic definition of fitness. The American Naturalist 142, 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, L and Tu, BP (2012) Driving the cell cycle through metabolism. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 28, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, WR, Singleton, SF and Benkovic, SJ (1996) A perspective on biological catalysis. Nature Structural Biology 3, 821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capra, JA and Singh, M (2007) Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23, 1875–1882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casari, G, Sander, C and Valencia, A (1995) A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nature Structural Biology 2, 171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, CL and Weber, RS (1998) Selection costs of amino acid substitutions in ColE1 and ColIa gene clusters harbored by Escherichia coli. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15, 774–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasmeh, P and Kepp, KP (2017) Superoxide dismutase 1 is positively selected to minimize protein aggregation in great apes. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 74, 3023–3037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasmeh, P, Serohijos, AWR, Kepp, KP and Shakhnovich, EI (2014) The influence of selection for protein stability on dN/dS estimations. Genome Biology and Evolution 6, 2956–2967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePristo, MA, Weinreich, DM and Hartl, DL (2005) Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Visser, R, Spitters, CJT and Bouma, TJ (1992) Energy cost of protein turnover: theoretical calculation and experimental estimation from regression of respiration on protein concentration of full-grown leaves. Molecular, Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Plant Respiration. The Hague: Academic Publishing, pp. 493–508.Google Scholar
Drummond, DA and Wilke, CO (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, DA and Wilke, CO (2009) The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nature Reviews. Genetics 10, 715–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, DA, Bloom, JD, Adami, C, Wilke, CO and Arnold, FH (2005) Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 14338–14343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, DA, Raval, A and Wilke, CO (2006) A single determinant dominates the rate of protein evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, B, Zielinski, DC, Monk, JM and Palsson, BO (2018) Thermodynamic favorability and pathway yield as evolutionary tradeoffs in biosynthetic pathway choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 11339–11344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echave, J, Spielman, SJ and Wilke, CO (2016) Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites. Nature Reviews Genetics 17, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenberg, M and Kurland, CG (1984) Costs of accuracy determined by a maximal growth rate constraint. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 17, 45–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, BP, Min, W, van Oijen, AM, Lee, KT, Luo, G, Sun, H, Cherayil, BJ, Kou, SC and Sunney, X (2005) Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis–Menten equation revisited. Nature Chemical Biology 2, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fay, JC, Wyckoff, GJ and Wu, C-I (2002) Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila. Nature 415, 1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, SE, Patch, AM and Ellard, S (2010) Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 14, 533–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, JC and Hansche, P (1972) Directed evolution of metabolic pathways in microbial populations. I. Modification of the acid phosphatase pH optimum in S. cerevisiae. Genetics 70, 59–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Fraser, KPP and Rogers, AD (2007) Protein metabolism in marine animals: the underlying mechanism of growth. Advances in Marine Biology 52, 267–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, HB, Hirsh, AE, Steinmetz, LM, Scharfe, C and Feldman, MW (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science (New York, N.Y.) 296, 750–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, H, Grimsley, G, Scholtz, JM and Pace, CN (2010) Increasing protein stability: importance of ΔCp and the denatured state. Protein Science 19, 1044–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuhara, R, Tezuka, T and Kageyama, T (2002) Structure, molecular evolution, and gene expression of primate superoxide dismutases. Gene 296, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, J, Wilson, TR, Eberhart, ME and Alexandrova, AN (2019) Charge density in enzyme active site as a descriptor of electrostatic preorganization. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 59, 2367–2373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futcher, B, Latter, GI, Monardo, P, McLaughlin, CS and Garrels, JI (1999) A sampling of the yeast proteome. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19, 7357–7368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garat, B and Musto, H (2000) Trends of amino acid usage in the proteins from the unicellular parasite Giardia lamblia. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 279, 996–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiler-Samerotte, KA, Dion, MF, Budnik, BA, Wang, SM, Hartl, DL and Drummond, DA (2011) Misfolded proteins impose a dosage-dependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 680–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghaemmaghami, S, Huh, W-K, Bower, K, Howson, RW, Belle, A, Dephoure, N, O'Shea, EK and Weissman, JS (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, DJ, Bacardit, J, Bachmair, A and Holdsworth, MJ (2014) The eukaryotic N-end rule pathway: conserved mechanisms and diverse functions. Trends in Cell Biology 24, 603–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, JH (1984) The molecular clock may be an episodic clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81, 8009–8013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, JH (1986) Rates of molecular evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17, 637–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, JH (2001) Is the population size of a species relevant to Its evolution? Evolution 55, 2161–2169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giovannoni, SJ, Thrash, JC and Temperton, B (2014) Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology. The ISME Journal 8, 1553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, F, Pupko, T, Paz, I, Bell, RE, Bechor-Shental, D, Martz, E and Ben-Tal, N (2003) Consurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19, 163–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, N, Thorne, JL and Jones, DT (1998) Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149, 445–458.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, RA (2008) The structure of protein evolution and the evolution of protein structure. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 18, 170–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, RA (2011) The evolution and evolutionary consequences of marginal thermostability in proteins. Proteins 79, 1396–1407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, MW, Burger, G and Lang, BF (1999) Mitochondrial evolution. Science (New York, N.Y.) 283, 1476–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gsponer, J, Futschik, ME, Teichmann, SA and Babu, MM (2008) Tight regulation of unstructured proteins: from transcript synthesis to protein degradation. Science (New York, N.Y.) 322, 1365–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gygi, SP, Rochon, Y, Franza, BR and Aebersold, R (1999) Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19, 1720–1730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, MW and Kern, AD (2004) Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22, 803–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, BG (1981) Changes in the substrate specificities of an enzyme during directed evolution of new functions. Biochemistry 20, 4042–4049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargrove, JL and Schmidt, FH (1989) The role of mRNA and protein stability in gene expression. The FASEB Journal 3, 2360–2370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harish, A and Kurland, CG (2017) Empirical genome evolution models root the tree of life. Biochimie 138, 137–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harman, D (2003) The free radical theory of aging. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 5, 557–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harold, FM (1987) The Vital Force: A Study of Bioenergetics. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Hawkins, AJS (1991) Protein turnover: a functional appraisal. Functional Ecology 5, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, AJS, Bayne, BL, Day, AJ and Denton, EJ (1986) Protein turnover, physiological energetics and heterozygosity in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis: the basis of variable age-specific growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 229, 161–176.Google Scholar
Hawks, J, Hunley, K, Lee, S-H and Wolpoff, M (2000) Population bottlenecks and Pleistocene human evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 2–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heizer, EM, Raiford, DW, Raymer, ML, Doom, TE, Miller, RV and Krane, DE (2006) Amino acid cost and codon-usage biases in 6 prokaryotic genomes: a whole-genome analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 1670–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heizer, EM, Raymer, ML and Krane, DE (2011) Amino acid biosynthetic cost and protein conservation. Journal of Molecular Evolution 72, 466–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hipkiss, AR (2017) On the relationship between energy metabolism, proteostasis, aging and Parkinson's disease: possible causative role of methylglyoxal and alleviative potential of carnosine. Aging and Disease 8, 334–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, LD (2009) Genetics and the understanding of selection. Nature Reviews. Genetics 10, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, LD and Smith, NGC (1999) Do essential genes evolve slowly? Current Biology 9, 747–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikemura, T (1985) Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2, 13–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Jansen, R and Gerstein, M (2000) Analysis of the yeast transcriptome with structural and functional categories: characterizing highly expressed proteins. Nucleic Acids Research 28, 1481–1488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, IK, Mariño-Ramírez, L, Wolf, YI and Koonin, EV (2004) Conservation and coevolution in the scale-free human gene coexpression network. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21, 2058–2070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julenius, K and Pedersen, AG (2006) Protein evolution is faster outside the cell. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 2039–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahali, B, Basak, S and Ghosh, TC (2007) Reinvestigating the codon and amino acid usage of S. cerevisiae genome: a new insight from protein secondary structure analysis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 354, 693–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanaya, S, Yamada, Y, Kudo, Y and Ikemura, T (1999) Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species-specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis. Gene 238, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kepp, KP (2015) Genotype-property patient-phenotype relations suggest that proteome exhaustion can cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS ONE 10, e0118649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kepp, KP (2019) A quantitative model of human neurodegenerative diseases involving protein aggregation. Neurobiology of Aging 80, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kepp, KP and Dasmeh, P (2014) A model of proteostatic energy cost and its use in analysis of proteome trends and sequence evolution. PLoS ONE 9, e90504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713.Google ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M (1991) The neutral theory of molecular evolution: a review of recent evidence. The Japanese Journal of Genetics 66, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, TBL (2011) Systems biology of ageing and longevity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 366, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, TB and Rose, MR (1991) Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 332, 15–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Kleiber, M (1932) Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6, 315–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M (1947) Body size and metabolic rate. Physiological Reviews 27, 511–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koonin, EV, Wolf, YI and Karev, GP (2002) The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S and Subramanian, S (2002) Mutation rates in mammalian genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 803–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurland, CG and Ehrenberg, M (1984) Optimization of translation accuracy. In Cohn, WE and Moldave, K (eds) Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, vol. 31. New York: Elsevier, pp. 191–219.Google Scholar
Kurland, CG and Ehrenberg, M (1987) Growth-optimizing accuracy of gene expression. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry 16, 291–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurland, CG and Harish, A (2015) The phylogenomics of protein structures: the backstory. Biochimie 119, 284–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landis, GN and Tower, J (2005) Superoxide dismutase evolution and life span regulation. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 126, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, N (2011) Energetics and genetics across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide. Biology Direct 6, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, N and Martin, W (2010) The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467, 929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, WF, Zhou, XX and Lu, P (2005) Structural features of thermozymes. Biotechnology Advances 23, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberles, DA, Teichmann, SA, Bahar, I, Bastolla, U, Bloom, J, Bornberg‐Bauer, E, Colwell, LJ, De Koning, AJ, Dokholyan, NV, Echave, J and Elofsson, A (2012) The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution. Protein Science 21, 769–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, MJ, Byström, R, Boknäs, N, Andersen, PM and Oliveberg, M (2005) Systematically perturbed folding patterns of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-associated SOD1 mutants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 9754–9759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobkovsky, AE, Wolf, YI and Koonin, EV (2010) Universal distribution of protein evolution rates as a consequence of protein folding physics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 2983–2988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobry, JR and Gautier, C (1994) Hydrophobicity, expressivity and aromaticity are the major trends of amino-acid usage in 999 Escherichia coli chromosome-encoded genes. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 3174–3180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, B, Anderson, I, Davies, R, Davies, R, Alsmark, UCM, Samuelson, J, Amedeo, P, Roncaglia, P, Berriman, M, Hirt, RP, Mann, BJ, Nozaki, T, Suh, B, Pop, M, Duchene, M and Hall, N (2005) The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nature 433, 865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotka, AJ (1922) Contribution to the energetics of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 8, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, KA, Higgins, CL and Wittung-Stafshede, P (2007) Thermodynamic stability and folding of proteins from hyperthermophilic organisms. FEBS Journal 274, 4023–4033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M (2006) Streamlining and simplification of microbial genome architecture. Annual Review of Microbiology 60, 327–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M and Marinov, GK (2015) The bioenergetic costs of a gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 15690–15695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marais, G and Duret, L (2001) Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation, and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Molecular Evolution 52, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margoliash, E (1963) Primary structure and evolution of cytochrome c. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 50, 672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margulis, L (1968) Evolutionary criteria in thallophytes: a radical alternative. Science (New York, N.Y.) 161, 1020–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margulis, L (1975) Symbiotic theory of the origin of eukaryotic organelles; criteria for proof. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Martin, AP and Palumbi, SR (1993) Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90, 4087–4091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E (1998) Two empires or three? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 9720–9723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuinness, ET (2010) Some molecular moments of the Hadean and Archaean Aeons: a retrospective overview from the interfacing years of the second to third millennia. Chemical Reviews 110, 5191–5215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McInerney, JO (2006) The causes of protein evolutionary rate variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 230–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, RW, Janečka, JE, Gatesy, J, Ryder, OA, Fischer, CA, Teeling, EC, Goodbla, A, Eizirik, E, Simão, TL, Stadler, T and Rabosky, DL (2011) Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science (New York, N.Y.) 334, 521–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milo, R (2013) What is the total number of protein molecules per cell volume? A call to rethink some published values. BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 35, 1050–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirny, LA and Shakhnovich, EI (1999) Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. Journal of Molecular Biology 291, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mogk, A, Schmidt, R and Bukau, B (2007) The N-end rule pathway for regulated proteolysis: prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies. Trends in Cell Biology 17, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgenstern, A, Jaszai, M, Eberhart, ME and Alexandrova, AN (2017) Quantified electrostatic preorganization in enzymes using the geometry of the electron charge density. Chemical Science 8, 5010–5018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozo-Villiarías, A and Querol, E (2006) Theoretical analysis and computational predictions of protein thermostability. Current Bioinformatics 1, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, PC and Henikoff, S (2003) SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Research 31, 3812–3814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbet, EG and Sleep, NH (2001) The habitat and nature of early life. Nature 409, 1083–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northrop, DB (1998) On the meaning of Km and V/K in enzyme kinetics. Journal of Chemical Education 75, 1153–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, HT (1988) Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science (New York, N.Y.) 242, 1132–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, T (1992) The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overington, J, Donnelly, D, Johnson, MS, Šali, A and Blundell, TL (1992) Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Science 1, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pál, C, Papp, B and Hurst, LD (2001) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158, 927–931.Google ScholarPubMed
Pál, C, Papp, B and Lercher, MJ (2006) An integrated view of protein evolution. Nature Reviews. Genetics 7, 337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, J, Shin, D, Getzoff, E and Tainer, J (2010) The structural biochemistry of the superoxide dismutases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1804, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piganeau, G and Eyre-Walker, A (2009) Evidence for variation in the effective population size of animal mitochondrial DNA. PLoS ONE 4, e4396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plata, G, Gottesman, ME and Vitkup, D (2010) The rate of the molecular clock and the cost of gratuitous protein synthesis. Genome Biology 11, R98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qian, J, Luscombe, NM and Gerstein, M (2001) Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: power-law behaviour and evolutionary model. Journal of Molecular Biology 313, 673–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radzicka, A and Wolfenden, R (1995) A proficient enzyme. Science (New York, N.Y.) 267, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raichle, ME and Gusnard, DA (2002) Appraising the brain's energy budget. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 10237–10239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raiford, DW, Heizer, EM, Miller, RV, Akashi, H, Raymer, ML and Krane, DE (2008) Do amino acid biosynthetic costs constrain protein evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Journal of Molecular Evolution 67, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsey, DC, Scherrer, MP, Zhou, T and Wilke, CO (2011) The relationship between relative solvent accessibility and evolutionary rate in protein evolution. Genetics 188, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeds, PJ, Fuller, MF, Nicholson, BA (1985) Metabolic basis of energy expenditure with particular reference to protein. In Garrow, JS and Halliday, D (eds), Substrate and Energy Metabolism in man, London: Libbey, pp. 46–57.Google Scholar
Richmond, RC (1970) Non-Darwinian evolution: a critique. Nature 225, 1025–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, AD and Murphy, KP (1997) Protein structure and the energetics of protein stability. Chemical Reviews 97, 1251–1268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, M, Lilley, R, Little, S, Emtage, JS, Yarranton, G, Stephens, P, Millican, M, Eaton, G and Humphreys, G (1984) Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research 12, 6663–6671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, EPC and Danchin, A (2004) An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, VM, Allen, AP, Brown, JH, Gillooly, JF, Herman, AB, Woodruff, WH and West, GB (2007) Scaling of number, size, and metabolic rate of cells with body size in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 4718–4723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawle, L and Ghosh, K (2011) How do thermophilic proteins and proteomes withstand high temperature? Biophysical Journal 101, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaber, J, Rispe, C, Wernegreen, J, Buness, A, Delmotte, F, Silva, FJ and Moya, A (2005) Gene expression levels influence amino acid usage and evolutionary rates in endosymbiotic bacteria. Gene 352, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrödinger, E (1944) What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seligmann, H (2003) Cost-minimization of amino acid usage. Journal of Molecular Evolution 56, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serohijos, AWR, Rimas, Z and Shakhnovich, EI (2012) Protein biophysics explains why highly abundant proteins evolve slowly. Cell Reports 2, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanley, DP and Kirkwood, TB (2000) Calorie restriction and aging: a life-history analysis. Evolution 54, 740–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, PM (1991) Determinants of DNA sequence divergence between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: codon usage, map position, and concerted evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 33, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shihab, HA, Gough, J, Cooper, DN, Stenson, PD, Barker, GL, Edwards, KJ, Day, IN and Gaunt, TR (2013) Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Human Mutation 34, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sikosek, T and Chan, HS (2014) Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 11, 20140419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, DR and Chapman, MR (2010) Economical evolution: microbes reduce the synthetic cost of extracellular proteins. MBio 1, e00131–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soskine, M and Tawfik, DS (2010) Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions. Nature Reviews Genetics 11, 572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, FL, Thiergart, T, Landan, G, Nelson-Sathi, S, Pereira, IA, Allen, JF, Lane, N and Martin, WF (2013) Early bioenergetic evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, 20130088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speakman, JR, Selman, C, McLaren, JS and Harper, EJ (2002) Living fast, dying when? The link between aging and energetics. The Journal of Nutrition 132(6 Suppl. 2), 1583S–1597S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swire, J (2007) Selection on synthesis cost affects interprotein amino acid usage in all three domains of life. Journal of Molecular Evolution 64, 558–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, N, Dehury, B and Kepp, KP (2019) Computing the pathogenicity of Alzheimer's disease presenilin 1 mutations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 59, 858–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taverna, DM and Goldstein, RA (2002) Why are proteins marginally stable? Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 46, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, RC and Dillin, A (2011) Aging as an event of proteostasis collapse. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3, a004440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tekaia, F, Yeramian, E and Dujon, B (2002) Amino acid composition of genomes, lifestyles of organisms, and evolutionary trends: a global picture with correspondence analysis. Gene 297, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thusberg, J, Olatubosun, A and Vihinen, M (2011) Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants. Human Mutation 32, 358–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokuriki, N and Tawfik, DS (2009) Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 19, 596–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokuriki, N, Stricher, F, Schymkowitz, J, Serrano, L and Tawfik, DS (2007) The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. Journal of Molecular Biology 369, 1318–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokuriki, N, Stricher, F, Serrano, L and Tawfik, DS (2008) How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Computational Biology 4, e1000002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolmasoff, JM, Ono, T and Cutler, RG (1980) Superoxide dismutase: correlation with life-span and specific metabolic rate in primate species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 77, 2777–2781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuller, T, Waldman, YY, Kupiec, M and Ruppin, E (2010). Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 3645–3650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urrutia, AO and Hurst, LD (2003) The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Research 13, 2260–2264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uversky, VN, Oldfield, CJ and Dunker, AK (2008) Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept. Annual Review of Biophysics 37, 215–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentine, J, Doucette, P and Potter, SZ (2005) Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annual Review of Biochemistry 74, 563–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varshavsky, A (1997) The N-end rule pathway of protein degradation. Genes to Cells 2, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venev, SV and Zeldovich, KB (2018) Thermophilic adaptation in prokaryotes is constrained by metabolic costs of proteostasis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, A (2005) Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22, 1365–1374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, DP, Hirsh, AE, Fraser, HB, Kumm, J, Giaever, G, Eisen, MB and Feldman, MW (2005) Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 5483–5488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Johnson, JL, Agar, NYR and Agar, JN (2008) Protein aggregation and protein instability govern familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient survival. PLoS Biology 6, e170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L, Deng, H-X, Grisotti, G, Zhai, H, Siddique, T and Roos, RP (2009) Wild-type SOD1 overexpression accelerates disease onset of a G85R SOD1 mouse. Human Molecular Genetics 18, 1642–1651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M, Kurland, CG and Caetano-Anollés, G (2011) Reductive evolution of proteomes and protein structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 11954–11958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warshel, A (1998) Electrostatic origin of the catalytic power of enzymes and the role of preorganized active sites. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 27035–27038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterlow, JC (1995) Whole-body protein turnover in humans – past, present, and future. Annual Review of Nutrition 15, 57–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wensink, MJ, van Heemst, D, Rozing, MP and Westendorp, RGJ (2012) The maintenance gap: a new theoretical perspective on the evolution of aging. Biogerontology 13, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westendorp, RG and Kirkwood, TB (1998) Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success. Nature 396, 743–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, JH and Orr, HA (1993) Increased heritable variation following population bottlenecks: the role of dominance. Evolution 47, 949–957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, EE, Goodstadt, L and Ponting, CP (2004) Elevated rates of protein secretion, evolution, and disease among tissue-specific genes. Genome Research 14, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woese, CR (1998) Default taxonomy: Ernst Mayr's view of the microbial world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 11043–11046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfenden, R and Snider, MJ (2001) The depth of chemical time and the power of enzymes as catalysts. Accounts of Chemical Research 34, 938–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worth, CL, Gong, S and Blundell, TL (2009) Structural and functional constraints in the evolution of protein families. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10, 709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wylie, CS and Shakhnovich, EI (2011) A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 9916–9921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J-R, Liao, B-Y, Zhuang, S-M and Zhang, J (2012) Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, E831–E840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yi, S, Ellsworth, DL and Li, W-H (2002) Slow molecular clocks in Old World monkeys, apes, and humans. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19, 2191–2198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J (2000) Protein-length distributions for the three domains of life. Trends in Genetics 16, 107–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X and Houk, KN (2005) Why enzymes are proficient catalysts: beyond the Pauling paradigm. Accounts of Chemical Research 38, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L and Li, W-H (2004) Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21, 236–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H, Wang, Y, Li, J, Chen, H, He, X, Zhang, H, Liang, H and Lu, J (2018) Biosynthetic energy cost for amino acids decreases in cancer evolution. Nature Communications 9, 4124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerkandl, E (1976) Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level. Journal of Molecular Evolution 7, 269–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerkandl, E and Pauling, LB (1962) Molecular disease, evolution, and genetic heterogeneity. In Kasha, M and Pullman, B (eds), Horizons in Biochemistry, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 189–225.Google Scholar
Zuckerkandl, E and Pauling, L (1965) Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. Journal of Theoretical Biology 8, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed