Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:39:14.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maser Action in Interstellar OH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

B.J. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Division of Radiophysics, CSIRO, Sydney

Extract

Since 1965 we have been unravelling the curious properties of the intense 18 cm emission lines observed from OH molecules. We are still without a quantitative theory of the emission that might tie the threads together and provide guidelines for the observational work. The most plausible hypothesis is that we are dealing with naturally occurring interstellar gas masers. I want to present some of the latest evidence we have in favour of the maser action, and to indicate where it is inadequate. I will concentrate on work done in 1967, as the earlier work has been discussed in detail elsewhere.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Robinson, B.T.. and McGee, R.X., Annual Review Astron. Astrophys., 5, 183 (1967).Google Scholar
2 Robinson, B.J., ‘Radio Astronomy and the Galactic System’, p. 49, Academic Press, London, 1967.Google Scholar
3 Moran, J.M., Burke, B.F., Barrett, A.H., Rogers, A.E.E., Carter, J.C. Ball, J.A., and Cudaback, D.D., Astron. J. (in press).Google Scholar
4 Davies, R.D., Rowson, B., Booth, R.S., Cooper, A.J., Gent, H., Adgie, R.L., and Crowther, J.H., Nature, 213, 1109 (1967).Google Scholar
5 Palmer, P., and Zuckerman, B., Astrophys. J., 148, 727 (1967).Google Scholar
6 Weaver, H., Dieter, N.H., and Williams, D.R.W., Astrophys. J. Suppl.(in press).Google Scholar
7 Rogers, A.E.E., and Barrett, A.H., ‘Radio Astronomy and the Galactic System’, p. 77, Academic Press, London, 1967.Google Scholar
8 Goss, W.M., Astrophys. J. Suppl. No. 137 (in press).Google Scholar
9 Heiles, C., Astrophys. J. (in press).Google Scholar
10 McGee, R.X., Gardner, F.F., and Robinson, B.J., Aust. J. Phys., 20, 407 (1967).Google Scholar
11 Ball, J.A., and Meeks, M.L., Astron. J. (in press).Google Scholar
12 Turner, B.E., thesis, Berkeley, 1967.Google Scholar
13 Litvak, M.M., McWhorter, A.L., Meeks, M.L., and Zeiger, H.J., Phys.Rev. Lett., 17, 821 (1966).Google Scholar
14 Johnston, I.D., Astrophys. J., 150, 33 (1967).Google Scholar
15 Heer, C.V., and Settles, R.A., J. Molec. Spectros., 23, 448 (1967).Google Scholar
16 Gwinn, W.D., Milliken, R., Goss, W.M., and Turner, B.E., in preparation.Google Scholar
17 Gaydon, A.G., and Wolfhard, H.G., Proc. Roy. Soc., A208, 63 (1951).Google Scholar
18 Symonds, J.L., ‘Symposium on Radio and Optical Studies of the Galaxy, p. 89, Mount Stromlo Obs., 1966.Google Scholar
19 Hughes, V.A., and Butler, R., Nature, 215, 941 (1967).Google Scholar
20 Solomon, P.M., paper delivered at IAU Assembly, Prague, 1967.Google Scholar
21 Spindler, G.B., Ticktin, S., and Schiff, H.I., Nature, 214, 1006 (1967).Google Scholar