Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Socio-economic differences in weight-control behaviours and barriers to weight control

  • Jessica Siu (a1), Katrina Giskes (a1) and Gavin Turrell (a1)

Abstract

Objective

To examine socio-economic differences in weight-control behaviours (WCB) and barriers to weight control.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Setting

Data were obtained by means of a postal questionnaire.

Subjects

A total of 1013 men and women aged 45–60 years residing in Brisbane, Australia (69·8 % response rate).

Results

Binary and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, gender and BMI. Socio-economically disadvantaged groups were less likely to engage in weight control (OR for lowest income quartile = 0·60, 95 % CI 0·39, 0·94); among those who engaged in weight control, the disadvantaged group had a likelihood of 0·52 (95 % CI 0·30, 0·90) of adopting exercise strategies, including moderate (OR = 0·56, 95 % CI 0·33, 0·96) and vigorous (OR = 0·47, 95 % CI 0·25, 0·89) physical activities, compared with their more-advantaged counterparts. However, lower socio-economic groups were more likely to decrease their sitting time to control their weight compared with their advantaged counterparts (OR for secondary school or lower education = 1·78, 95 % CI 1·11, 2·84). They were also more likely to believe that losing weight was expensive, not of high priority, required a lot of cooking skills and involved eating differently from others in the household.

Conclusions

Marked socio-economic inequalities existed with regard to engaging in WCB, the type of weight-control strategies used and the perceived barriers to weight control; these differences are consistent with socio-economic gradients in weight status. These factors may need to be included in health promotion strategies that address socio-economic inequalities in weight status, as well as inequalities in weight-related health outcomes.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Socio-economic differences in weight-control behaviours and barriers to weight control
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Socio-economic differences in weight-control behaviours and barriers to weight control
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Socio-economic differences in weight-control behaviours and barriers to weight control
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email jessica.siu@qut.edu.au

References

Hide All
1. Haslam, D & James, P (2005) Obesity. Lancet 366, 11971209.
2. Flegal, K, Carroll, M, Kuczmarski, R et al. (1998) Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22, 3947.
3. Kelly, T, Yang, W, Chen, C et al. (2008) Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond) 32, 14311437.
4. McLaren, L (2007) Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev 29, 2948.
5. Sobal, J & Stunkard, A (1989) Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull 105, 260275.
6. Turrell, G, Stanley, L, de Looper, M et al. (2006) Health Inequalities in Australia: Morbidity, Health Behaviours, Risk Factors and Health Service Use. Canberra: Queensland University of Technology and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
7. Ball, K, Mishra, G & Crawford, D (2002) Which aspects of socioeconomic status are related to obesity among men and women? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26, 559565.
8. Williams, L, Germov, J & Young, A (2007) Preventing weight gain: a population cohort study of the nature and effectiveness of mid-age women's weight control practices. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 978986.
9. Jeffery, R & French, S (1996) Socioeconomic status and weight control practices among 20- to 45-year-old women. Am J Public Health 86, 10051010.
10. Wardle, J & Griffith, J (2001) Socioeconomic status and weight control practices in British adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 55, 185190.
11. Paxton, S, Sculthorpe, A & Gibbons, K (1994) Weight loss strategies and beliefs in high and low socioeconomic areas of Melbourne. Aust N Z J Public Health 18, 412417.
12. Kruger, J, Galuska, D, Serdula, M et al. (2004) Attempting to lose weight specific practices among US adults. Am J Prev Med 26, 402406.
13. Weiss, E, Galuska, D, Khan, L et al. (2006) Weight-control practices among US adults, 2001–2002. Am J Prev Med 31, 1824.
14. Timperio, A, Cameron-Smith, D, Burns, C et al. (2000) Physical activity beliefs and behaviours among adults attempting weight control. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 8187.
15. Serdula, M, Williamson, D, Anda, R et al. (1994) Weight control practices in adults: results of a multistate telephone survey. Am J Public Health 84, 18211824.
16. Tsai, A, Wadden, T, Pillitteri, J et al. (2009) Disparities by ethnicity and socioeconomic status in the use of weight loss treatments. J Natl Med Assoc 101, 6270.
17. French, S, Jeffery, R, Story, M et al. (1998) Perceived barriers to and incentives for participation in a weight-loss program among low-income women in WIC. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 7981.
18. Giskes, K, van Lenthe, F, Brug, J et al. (2007) Socioeconomic inequalities in food purchasing: the contribution of respondent-perceived and actual (objectively measured) price and availability of foods. Prev Med 45, 4148.
19. Inglis, V, Ball, K & Crawford, D (2005) Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviours than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration. Appetite 45, 334343.
20. Burton, N, Turrell, G & Oldenburg, B (2003) Participation in recreational physical activity: why do socioeconomic groups differ? Health Educ Behav 30, 225244.
21. Dunstan, D, Zimmet, P, Welborn, T et al. (2001) Diabesity and Associated Disorders in Australia – 2000: The Accelerating Epidemic. Melbourne: International Diabetes Institute.
22. Ball, K, Crawford, D, Ireland, P et al. (2003) Patterns and demographic predictors of 5-year weight change in a multi-ethnic cohort of men and women in Australia. Public Health Nutr 6, 269280.
23. Hadden, W (1996) The use of educational attainment as an indicator of socioeconomic position. Am J Public Health 86, 15251526.
24. Australian Electoral Commission (2008) Electoral roll – frequently asked questions. http://www.aec.gov.au/FAQs/Electoral_Roll.htm (accessed March 2009).
25. Dillman, D (1972) Increasing mail questionnaire response in large samples of the general public. Public Opin Q 36, 254257.
26. Brennan, M (1992) Techniques for improving mail survey response rate. Market Bull 3, 24.
27. Greer, T, Chuchinprakarn, N & Seshadri, S (2000) Likelihood of participating in mail survey research. Ind Market Manage 29, 97109.
28. Erwin, W & Wheelright, L (2002) Improving mail survey response rates through the use of a monetary incentive. J Mental Health Counseling 24, 247255.
29. Landis, J & Koch, G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159174.
30. National Health and Medical Research Council (2003) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Australia: NHMRC.
31. Baker International Diabetes Institute (2006) AusDiab Questionnaires. http://www.bakeridi.edu/ausdiab/publication/ (accessed April 2011).
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2005–2006 Questionnaire File. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2005-2006/quex05_06.htm (accessed February 2010).
33. Feinstein, A & Cicchetti, D (1990) High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 43, 543549.
34. Mak, H, Yau, K & Chan, B (2004) Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa values as addiitonal indicators to measure observer agreement. Radiology 232, 302303.
35. Galobardes, B, Shaw, M, Lawlor, D et al. (2006) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 60, 712.
36. Sobal, J (1991) Obesity and socioeconomic status: a framework for examining relationships between physical and social variables. Med Anthropol 13, 231247.
37. Galobardes, B, Morabia, A & Bernstein, M (2000) The differential effect of education and occupation on body mass and overweight in a sample of working people of the general population. Ann Epidemiol 10, 532537.
38. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007) 6537.0 – Government Benefits, Taxes and Household Income, Australia, 2003–04. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; available at http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/6537.0Appendix22003-04
39. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) CDataOnline. http://www.abs.gov.au/CDataOnline (accessed March 2010).
40. Timperio, A, Cameron-Smith, D, Burns, C et al. (2000) The public's response to the obesity epidemic in Australia: weight concerns and weight control practices of men and women. Public Health Nutr 4, 417424.
41. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. WHO Technical Report Series no. 894. Geneva: WHO.
42. National Health and Medical Research Council (2003) Dietary Guidelines for Australian Adults. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
43. Story, M, French, S, Resnick, M et al. (1995) Ethnic/racial and socioeconomic differences in dieting behaviors and body image perceptions in adolescents. Int J Eat Disord 18, 173179.
44. Wardle, J & Steptoe, A (2003) Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. J Epidemiol Community Health 57, 440443.
45. Dammann, K & Smith, C (2009) Factors affecting low-income women's food choices and the perceived impact of dietary intake and socioeconomic status on their health and weight. J Nutr Educ Behav 41, 242253.
46. Gidlow, C, Johnston, L, Crone, D et al. (2006) A systematic review of the relationship between socio-economic position and physical activity. Health Educ J 65, 338367.
47. Popham, F & Mitchell, R (2007) Relation of employment status to socioeconomic position and physical activity types. Prev Med 45, 182188.
48. Brown, A & Siahpush, M (2007) Risk factors for overweight and obesity: results from the 2001 National Health Survey. J R Inst Public Health 121, 603613.
49. Parmenter, K, Waller, J & Wardle, J (2000) Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England. Health Educ Res 15, 163174.
50. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2008) Australia's Health Series. Catalogue no. AUS 99. Canberra: AIHW.
51. McLennan, W (1995) How Australians Measure Up. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
52. Tehard, B, Van Lielre, M, Com Nougue, C et al. (2002) Anthropometric measurements and body sihouette of women: validity and perceptions. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 17791784.
53. Waters, A (1993) Assessment of Self-Reported Height and Weight and Their Use in the Determination of Body Mass Index. Canberra: AIHW.
54. Drivsholm, T, Eplov, L, Davidsen, M et al. (2006) Representativeness in population-based studies: a detailed description of non-response in a Danish cohort study. Scand J Public Health 34, 623631.
55. van Loon, A, Tijhuis, M, Picavet, H et al. (2003) Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations. Ann Epidemiol 13, 105110.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed