1.Vorster, HH, Murphy, SP, Allen, LH et al. (2007) Application of nutrient intake values (NIVs). Food Nutr Bull 28, Suppl. 1, 116–122.
2.King, JC & Garza, C (2007) Harmonization of nutrient intake values. Food Nutr Bull 28, Suppl. 1, 3–12.
3.Doets, E, de Wit, LS, Dhonukshe-Rutten, RAM et al. (2008) Current micronutrient recommendations in Europe: towards understanding their differences and similarities. Eur J Nutr 47, 17–40.
4.Scientific Committee for Food (1993) Nutrient and Energy Intakes for the European Community. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food, Thirty First Series. Luxembourg: European Commission; available at http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out89.pdf
5.Thuraisingam, S, Riddell, L, Cook, K et al. (2009) The politics of developing reference standards for nutrient intakes: the case of Australia and New Zealand. Public Health Nutr 12, 1531–1539.
6.Pijls, L, Ashwell, M & Lambert, J (2009) EURRECA – a network of excellence to align European micronutrient recommendations. Food Chem 113, 748–753.
7.Garza, C & Pelletier, DL (2007) Dietary guidelines past, present, and future. In Nation’s Nutrition, p. 205 [E Kennedy and R Deckelbaum, editors]. Washington, DC: ILSI Press.
8.Brown, MB, Lentsch, J & Weingart, P (2005) Representation, expertise and the German parliament: a comparison of three advisory institutes. In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, pp. 81–101 [S Maasen and P Weignart, editors]. Dordrecht: Springer.
9.Trübswasser, U & Branca, F (2009) Nutrition policy is taking shape in Europe. Public Health Nutr 12, 295–306.
10.Ezrahi, Y (1990) The Descent of Icarus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.Rayner, S (2007) The rise of risk and the decline of politics. Environmental Hazard 7, 165–172.
12.Commission of the European Communities (2000) Science, Society and the Citizen in Europe. Commission Working Document SEC(2000) 1973, 14.11.2000. Brussels: European Commission.
13.Walls, J, O’Riordan, T, Horlick-Jones, T et al. (2005) The meta-governance of risk and new technologies: GM crops and mobile telephones. J Risk Res 8, 635–661.
14.Agar, J (2008) What happened in the sixties? Br J Hist Sci 41, 567–600.
15.Packer, K (2007) Defra’s Scientific Advisory Committees and Public Engagement. KP Draft Defra Report 1.3. London: Council for Science and Technology.
16.Jackson, T & Michaelis, L (2003) Policies for Sustainable Consumption. London: Sustainable Development Commission.
17.Irwin, A & Michael, M (2003) Science, Social Theory & Public Knowledge. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.
18.Commission of the European Communities (2001) European Governance: A White Paper. COM(2001) 428 final, 25.7.2001. Brussels: European Commission.
19.Wardman, J & Lofstedt, RE; Advisory Group on Risk Communications (2009) European Food Safety Authority – Risk Communication Annual Review. EFSA/AGRC/29MAY2009/AGENDA ITEM 7.3. Parma: EFSA.
20.European Food Safety Authority (2009) Transparency in Risk Assessment – Scientific Aspects. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General Principles. The EFSA Journal 1051, 1–22.
21.Stigoe, J & Wilsdon, J (2006) Engagement, Evidence and Expertise. Balancing Different Forms of Knowledge in Regulatory Decision-Making. A Discussion Paper for the Food Standards Agency. DEMOS Draft 2.0, 14 September. London: FSA.
22.Solesbury, W (2001) Evidence Based Policy: Whence it Came and Where it’s Going. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Working Paper no. 1. London: Queen Mary, University of London; available at http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/45/84/wp1.pdf
23.Glynn, S, Flanagan, K, Keenan, M et al. (2001) Science and Governance: Describing and Typifying the Scientific Advice Structure in the Policy Making Process – a Multinational Study. Report EUR 19830 EN. Seville: European Commission Joint Research Centre (DG JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
24.Jasanoff, S (2005) Judgment under siege: the three-body problem of expert legitimacy. In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, pp. 209–224 [S Maasen and P Weingart, editors]. Dordrecht: Springer.
25.Maasen, S & Weigart, P (editors) (2005) Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol. 24. Springer.
26.Evans, R & Collins, H (2002) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc Stud Sci 32, 235–296.
27.Willison, DJ & McLeod, SM (1999) The role of research evidence in pharmaceutical policy making: evidence when necessary but not necessarily evidence. J Eval Clin Pract 5, 243–249.
28.Weiss, C (1979) The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 39, 426–431.
29.Wynne, B (2002) Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: reflexivity inside out? Curr Sociol 50, 459–477.
30.Dobrow, MJ, Goel, V, Lemieux-Charles, L et al. (2006) The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. Soc Sci Med 63, 1811–1824.
31.Nunn, R (2008) A network model of expertise. Bull Sci Technol Soc 28, 414–427.
32.Hilgartner, S (2000) Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.Jasanoff, S (editor) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
34.Blok, A (2007) Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference. Public Underst Sci 16, 163–182.
35.Stirling, A (2005) Opening up or closing down: analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. Jpn J Sci Technol Soc 14, 63–83.
36.Horlick-Jones, T (2005) Informal logics of risk: contingency and modes of practical reasoning. J Risk Res 8, 253–272.
37.Lowndes, V, Pratchett, L & Stoker, G (2001) Trends in public participation: Part 1 – local government perspectives. Public Adm 79, 205–222.
38.Morton, A, Airoldi, M & Phillips, D (2009) Nuclear risk management on stage: a decision analysis perspective on the UK’s Committee on Radioactive Waste Management. Risk Anal 29, 764–779.
39.Armstrong, R, Waters, E, Roberts, H et al. (2006) The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health. J Public Health 28, 384–389.
40.Wentholt, MTA, Rowe, G, König, A et al. (2009) The views of key stakeholders on an evolving food risk governance framework: results from a Delphi study. Food Policy 34, 539–548.
41.Renn, O (2004) The challenge of integrating deliberation and expertise: participation and discourse in risk management. In Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field, pp. 289–366 [TL McDaniels and MJ Small, editors]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.Stirling, A (2008) Science, precaution and the politics of technological risk. Converging implications in evolutionary and social scientific perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1128, 95–110.
43.Dobrow, M, Goel, V & Upshur, REG (2004) Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med 58, 207–217.
44.Guston, DH (2000) Boundary organisations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Human Values 26, 399–408.
45.Cash, D, Clark, W, Alcock, F et al. (2002) Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making. KSG Working Papers Series no. RWP02-046. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=372280
47.Nordic Council of Ministers (2004) Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2004 – Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4th ed. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
48.German Nutrition Society, Austrian Nutrition Society, Swiss Society for Nutrition Research & Swiss Nutrition Association (2000) Referenzwerte fur Die Nahrstoffzufuhr (Reference Values for Nutrient Intake), 1st ed. Frankfurt/Main: Umschau Braus.
51.Robert Koch Institute (2004) Modell zu Auswirkungen einer Mehlanreicherung mit Folsäure auf die Versorgungssituation in Deutschland. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 34, 281–283.
52.German Nutrition Society (2006) Position paper on mandatory fortification of baking flours with folic acid. Emährungs-Umschau 53, Heft 11, S424–S429 (Teil 1) and Heft 12, S468–S479 (Teil 2).
53.Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy (2000) Folic Acid and the Prevention of Disease. Department of Health. Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 50. London: TSO.
57.Cole, BF, Baron, JA, Sandler, RS et al. (2007) Folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. JAMA 297, 2351–2359.
58.Mason, JB, Dickstein, A, Jacques, PF et al. (2007) A temporal association between folic acid fortification and an increase in colorectal cancer rates may be illuminating important biological principles: a hypothesis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16, 1325–1329.
59.Sociedad Española de Nutrición Comunitaria (2005) Guía de la Alimentación Saludable. Madrid: Editorial Everest.
60.Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (2004) Decree 446/2004 Coll., Laying down the requirements for food supplements and for enriching food with diet supplements, as amended.
61.Commission of the European Communities (1993) Nutrient and energy intakes for the European Community (Opinion expressed on 11 December 1992). Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food (Thirty-first Series). Luxembourg: Directorate-General Industry, European Commission.
63.Czeizel, AE & Kokeny, M (2002) Bread is fortified with folic acid in Hungary. BMJ 325, 391.