Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T21:09:01.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical activity, energy balance and obesity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

José Luís Griera
Affiliation:
Unit of Cardiovascular risk, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
José María Manzanares
Affiliation:
Endocrinology, and Nutrition and Dietetics Units, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan de Reus, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
Montserrat Barbany
Affiliation:
Centre Català de la Nutrició, Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona, Spain
José Contreras
Affiliation:
Unit of Cardiovascular risk, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
Pilar Amigó
Affiliation:
Endocrinology, and Nutrition and Dietetics Units, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan de Reus, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
Jordi Salas-Salvadó*
Affiliation:
Endocrinology, and Nutrition and Dietetics Units, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan de Reus, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43201 Reus, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Email jordi.salas@urv.cat
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obesity appears when energy intake exceeds energy expenditure. The most important variable compound of energy expenditure is physical activity. The global epidemics of obesity seem closely related to reduced physical activity and sedentariness widely increasing nowadays. Once obesity has developed, caloric intake becomes similar to energy expenditure. To lose weight, besides decreasing energy intake, energy expenditure must be increased. The promotion of physical activity is difficult and so the results of treatment of obesity are discouraging for doctors, other health professionals and patients. Proactive efforts from patients and health providers with an intensive feedback between them may be extremely helpful. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to provide better approaches on the role of physical activity for the prevention and treatment of obesity and for long-term weight-loss maintenance.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007

Epidemiology, prevention and treatment of obesity cannot be fully understood without considering physical activity. Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscle that results in energy expenditure beyond resting expenditure. Exercise is a subset of physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive and purposeful in the sense that improvement or maintenance of physical fitness is the objective.

Interrelations between low physical activity and the epidemiology of obesity and its effects on health are now clearReference DiPietro1. So, prevention of obesity might be achieved by increasing physical activity. Increasing physical activity is a logical tool for any weight-loss programme and is effectiveReference Garrow and Summerbell2. More controversies persist on weight maintenance, but there are data suggesting that those persons who exercise tend to maintain their weight betterReference Wing3.

Effects of sedentary lifestyle on obesity epidemics

There is evidence that low levels of physical activity may be contributing to the increasing incidence of obesity. In several studies, baseline measures of physical activity were inversely related to body mass index (BMI). A low level of physical activity predicted high weight gain, and decreases in physical activity over time were associated with greater weight gainReference Levine, Peters, Saris and Hill4. Physical activity can be divided into leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and activity performed in daily living, or lifestyle physical activity (LSPA)Reference Levine, Eberhardt and Jensen5. LTPA can be divided into exercise, sport, and household and other daily chores. Transportation to and from work is referred to as commuting physical activity. Video games, home computers and watching television with remote control devices now compete for LTPA. At the same time, jobs are more comfortable and sedentaryReference Fogelholm, Mannisto, Vartiainen and Pietinen6, and less physical activity is required for transportationReference Hu and Young7. The environment is a critical component for sedentariness. Industrialisation, urbanisation and improving income are each associated with car use, lifts, automatic washing machines and microwave ovens. While each may reduce physical activity only slightly, together they can have an important impact on total energy expenditure (TEE)Reference Levine, Peters, Saris and Hill4.

Role of physical activity on energy balance

The human body consumes energy in the form of resting energy expenditure (REE), thermal effect of food (TEF) and energy expenditure resulting from physical activity. TEF and REE are relatively constant and account for 70–80% of the TEEReference Johnson, Mahan and Escott-Stump8. In contrast, the contribution of physical activity is highly variable between individuals and therefore may provide the opportunity to increase energy expenditure. REE serves as a reference value when the energy expenditure produced by different activities is measured. A light physical activity like reading and driving can be equal to REE × 1.5. Other activities can be estimated in the same way (Table 1)9. There are tables depicting the caloric expenditure produced by different activities, which show the energy expenditure to carry one’s own weight around increases it. For instance, playing tennis induces an expenditure of 165 kcal in 30 min for a person of 110 lb, but 312 if he or she weights 210 lbReference Gutin and Kessler10. As a person loses weight, for a given amount of time exercising, doing the same activity at the same intensity, fewer calories are lost. So, to maintain the same level of energy expenditure, more physical activity is requiredReference Woo, Garrow and Pi-Sunyer11.

Table 1 Approximate energy expenditure for activity levels

REE – resting energy expenditure.

Source: Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council9.

Physical activity effects on obesity: benefits and risks

Increasing physical activity alone without a meal plan is hardly effective in treating obesityReference Garrow and Summerbell2, Reference Jakicic and Otto12, but exercise in combination with diet produces a greater weight loss (1.9 kg) than diet aloneReference Garrow and Summerbell2, Reference Jakicic and Otto12, 13; and it has many benefits for health14. For example, there have been observed improvements in prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitusReference Tuomilehto, Lindstrom, Eriksson, Valle, Hamalainen and Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka15, lower levels of blood pressure, lipids and glycemiaReference Fagard16Reference Kang, Robertson, Hagberg, Kelley, Goss and DaSilva18, reduction in cardiovascular diseaseReference Thompson, Buchner, Piña, Balady, Williams and Marcus19, particularly heart disease, and in mortalityReference Lee and Skerret20. Improvements in biliary disease, respiratory capacity, cancer, and in psychological parameters such as anxiety, depression and stress have also been reportedReference Warburton, Nicol and Bredin21.

The most common risk of physical activity in adults is musculoskeletal injury. Risk of injury increases with obesity, volume of exercise and participation in vigorous exercise such as competitive sports, whereas higher fitness, supervision, stretching exercises, protective equipment such as bike helmets, and well-designed environments protect against injury. Vigorous physical activity acutely increases the risk of sudden cardiac death and myocardial infarction among individuals with both diagnosed and occult heart disease. The relative risk of both exercise-related myocardial infarction and sudden death is greatest in individuals who are infrequently physically activeReference Thompson, Buchner, Piña, Balady, Williams and Marcus19.

How much physical activity and how often

Earlier guidelines advocating vigorous exercise for at least 20 min three times per week have been changed by a recommendation of 30 min of moderate-intensity physical activity on most days of the week14, Reference Pate, Pratt, Blair, Haskell, Macera and Bouchard22 to achieve a general health improvement. But to reach and maintain a weight loss, at least 150 min of moderate activity each week or 200–300 minReference Jakicic, Clark, Coleman, Donnelly, Foreyt and Melanson23 or 60 min of daily moderate activityReference Andersen, Wadden, Bartlett, Zemel, Verde and Franckowiak24 have been advocated. Recently, the International Association for the Study of Obesity gave two separate recommendations: To prevent the transition of overweight to obesity at least of 45–60 min day−1 of moderate activity are needed, but to prevent weight regain 60–90 min day−1 of moderate activity are required in formerly obese individualsReference Saris, Blair, van Baak, Eaton, Davies and Di Pietro25. Lesser amounts of vigorous intensity activity are effective as well. For children, even more activity time is recommended (Table 2)Reference Jakicic26.

Table 2 Different recommendations for doing physical activity

Modified from JakicicReference Jakicic26.

Changes in activities that people engage in routinely are usually easier to make and sustain than the more substantial changes involved in adding a structured exercise programme such as jogging. Such programmes should start slowly. First, walking, then walking faster and then running or bicycling, aerobic dancing or swimming, 30 min, 5 days a week (150 min week−1). If the patient is capable of following that rhythm and shows a reasonable attitude and reaches that level with success, the doctor will consider the possibility of increasing the prescription to 60 min of physical training 5 days a week (300 min week−1). Each step may last for some weeksReference Jakicic26. A pyramid of physical activities for adults has been proposed by the Spanish Society for the Study of Obesity (Fig. 1)Reference Rubio, Salas-Salvadó, Barbany, Moreno, Aranceta and Bellido27.

Fig. 1 Physical activity pyramid proposal for adultsReference Rubio, Salas-Salvadó, Barbany, Moreno, Aranceta and Bellido27

A long-term approach in order to change sedentary habits must be prepared, with an individual programme for each patient based on aerobic repetitive exercises. The limit for the individual session must not exceed 70–80% of the maximum heart rate corresponding to each individual according to his age (recommended maximum heart rate: 220 − patient age). Stretching, warm-up and cool-down exercises at the beginning and the end of sessions are essentialReference Rubio, Salas-Salvadó, Barbany, Moreno, Aranceta and Bellido27.

Resistance exercises are also recommended 2–3 days per week. They consist of 8–10 different exercises, using the main muscle groups, with 10–15 repetitions for each type of programmed exercise. Increasing muscle mass has two results: First, increasing lean-mass that has more thermogenic activity may prevent weight regain. Second, increasing muscle strength can ameliorate usual life tasks, which is very important for elderly peopleReference Rubio, Salas-Salvadó, Barbany, Moreno, Aranceta and Bellido27.

Physical activity can be assessed by different techniques: questionnaires, log books, diaries and pedometers. Pedometers are cheap devices, placed in the inner part of one of the legs at the waistline and registers the regular pace over the chosen period of time. The objective is to reach about 10 000 paces per day. This figure is associated with an improvement in the health of the obese patientReference Tudor-Locke, Bell, Myers, Harris, Lauzon and Rodger28. Sedentary people do not exceed 6000–7000 paces per day. The objective would be to increase the daily rate by 3000 paces. It is often difficult to motivate the patient to continue with such physical activity in order to reach the required aim and to maintain that routine in the long termReference Di Pietro, Dziura and Blair29.

Individualisation of physical activity prescription

Physical activity will be individualised according to individual ability and to the possible risk/benefit cost.

Patient attitude towards physical activity

This factor will, on many occasions, lead to a failure of treatment. In order of frequency lack of motivation (85%), too much work, lack of time, tiredness, laziness, all other kinds of inconveniences or lack of health (5%) are the main complaints of patients. Few people claim lack of health (less than 5%) in comparison with those who claim lack of motivation (more than 85%)Reference Jakicic and Otto12. Some patients wait for a ‘miracle cure’. They are not interested in changing physical or dietetic habits or perhaps are looking for a definitive weight reduction in a short time. This type of patient has visited countless doctors previously. JakicicReference Jakicic26 proposes a kind of survey or an evaluation method of this predisposition step to behaviour change towards physical training, as shown in Table 3. According to the predisposition step where the patient is located, we shall project a different type of activity, and this will also influence the success rate. Setting up a programme of physical training always finds obstacles such as: ‘I do not have time’ and/or ‘it is monotonous and boring’. To combat this, the professional must try to introduce an intermittent physical training programme or to incorporate some modifications in the patient style of life in order to increase the energy costsReference Andersen, Wadden, Bartlett, Zemel, Verde and Franckowiak24. Different routine activities may be useful for that purpose: walking up the stairs instead of taking the lift, parking the car farther away from the office and walking the rest of the way and so on can contribute to raise the caloric expense without changing the daily routine too much, thus increasing physical activity in those patients unwilling to start a programmed exercise plan. A guideline for intermittent activity would be to spread the programmed time for routine physical activity into several sessions or working periods through the dayReference Jakicic, Wing, Butler and Robertson30. Adapting the activities to the family and social environment will increase the adherence to the programme. Other useful reinforcing techniques are group therapies, mailing, telephone and Internet contacts.

Table 3 Method of evaluating the predisposition to a change in the behaviour towards physical activity

Physical activity is defined as a voluntary activity of intensity similar to one quick walk.

Modified from JakicicReference Jakicic26.

Patients with osteoarthritis

This is an especially difficult group. But with a slight weight loss, locomotive functional ability may improve. This will also improve the amount of physical activity, which, at the same time, will increase the weight loss and in this way shall break the tendency to gain weight. Low-impact exercises (walking, cycling and swimming) cause less stress on bones and joints, whereas high-impact exercises (running and aerobic dancing) cause repeated impact on the knees, ankles and feet. Studies indicate that the intensity and nature of impact of physical activity are the two most important factors in determining the frequency of injuries.

Patients with cardiac disease

In these patients, physical activity will be programmed according to the grade of his/her disease. This must always be individualised and supervised by qualified staff. The American College of Sport MedicineReference Jakicic and Otto12 has established practical categories to classify patients in relation to potential risks of any physical activity programme.

  1. 1. Patients with low risk: asymptomatic from a cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic disease viewpoint. Not more than one risk factor (the American Heart Association includes children and adolescents here).

  2. 2. Patients with moderate risk: men older than 45 years, women older than 55 years; at least two cardiovascular risk factors.

  3. 3. Patients with high risk: signs/ symptoms of known cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic disease.

A statement by the American Heart Association (AHA) grades cardiovascular risk according to different criteria such as age of the patient, presence or absence of a known pathology and associated comorbidities. Some apparently healthy individuals may be prone to cardiological problems when they begin an exercise programme (class A, Table 4). People with known cardiac disease are graded in classes B, C and D according to low, moderate or high risk when exercising. This statement provides standards and guidelines for the testing and training of all individuals. Followed carefully, it will allow the impact of physical training to improve their health without increasing the risk of a cardiac eventReference Fletcher, Balady, Amsterdam, Chaitman, Eckel and Fleg31.

Table 4 Risk classification for physical training. Class A: apparently healthy individuals

ECG – electrocardiography.

*It is suggested that people classified as Class A-2 and, particularly, Class A-3 undergo a medical examination and possibly a medically supervised exercise test before engaging in vigorous physical training.

Source: Fletcher et al.Reference Fletcher, Balady, Amsterdam, Chaitman, Eckel and Fleg31.

Ageing

Physical activity is particularly beneficial for elderly people. Besides the same effects cited before, quality of life and muscle strength are improved. Thus, it is important to recommend activities that require low-level energy expenditure, particularly during the first few weeks of the programme, and to prescribe mild increases at any time when progression of activity is made. In these instances, however, participants are encouraged to increase the frequency of exercise (for shorter duration), even to perhaps three or four times per day. They may require longer warm-up and cool-down periods, perhaps 10–15 min, and gradually taper exerciseReference Fletcher, Balady, Amsterdam, Chaitman, Eckel and Fleg31, Reference Stewart32.

Summary

  1. 1. A low level of physical activity is related to weight gain, and decreases in physical activity over time were associated with greater weight gain. Physical activity may provide an opportunity to increase energy expenditure.

  2. 2. Increasing physical activity alone without a meal plan is not very effective in treating obesity, but exercise in combination with diet produces a greater weight loss than diet alone, and it has many benefits to health.

  3. 3. A physical training programme should be developed according to the individual characteristics of the patient, in relation to his/her general health state, age, attitude and capacity to carry it out.

  4. 4. It will be essential to consider the ‘invaluable collaboration’ of the person and we shall have to encourage and stimulate him not to lose motivation in the development of the programme, and so it will be essential to explain the potential benefits he gains from doing it properly.

Acknowledgements

Sources of funding: This study was funded in part by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Thematic Network G03/140 and RD06/0045, and PI051839), Spain.

Conflict of interest declaration: No authors have any conflict of interest.

Authorship responsibilities: All the authors have participated in writing the manuscript.

References

1DiPietro, L. Physical activity, body weight and adiposity: an epidemiologic perspective. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 1995; 23: 275303.Google Scholar
2Garrow, J, Summerbell, C. Meta-analysis: effects of exercise, with or without dieting, on body composition of overweight subjects. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1995; 49: 110.Google Scholar
3Wing, RR. Physical activity in the treatment of the adulthood overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1999; 31: S547S552.Google Scholar
4Levine, J, Peters, J, Saris, W, Hill, J. Impact of physical activity on the emerging crisis of obesity in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 11 (Suppl.): S710S713.Google Scholar
5Levine, JA, Eberhardt, NL, Jensen, MD. Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans. Science 1999; 283: 212214.Google Scholar
6Fogelholm, M, Mannisto, S, Vartiainen, E, Pietinen, P. Determinants of energy balance and overweight in Finland 1982 and 1992. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1996; 20: 10971104.Google Scholar
7Hu, PS, Young, JR. Personal Transportation Survey. Washington: Department of Transport, 1995.Google Scholar
8Johnson, RK. Energy. In: Mahan, LK, Escott-Stump, S, eds. Krause’s Food, Nutrition & Diet Therapy. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw-Hill Inc, tenth edition, 1995; 2032.Google Scholar
9Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council. NAS: Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989: 27.Google Scholar
10Gutin, B, Kessler, G. The High Energy Factor. New York: Random House, 1983.Google Scholar
11Woo, R, Garrow, JS, Pi-Sunyer, FX. Effect of exercise on spontaneous calorie intake in obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 36: 470477.Google Scholar
12Jakicic, JM, Otto, AD. Physical activity considerations for the treatment and prevention of obesity. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005; 82 (Suppl.): 226S229S.Google Scholar
13National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Obesity Research 1996; 6 (Suppl. 2): 51S210S.Google Scholar
14US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: a Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
15Tuomilehto, J, Lindstrom, J, Eriksson, JG, Valle, TT, Hamalainen, H, Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka, P, et al. . Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 344: 13431350.Google Scholar
16Fagard, R. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of hypertension in the obese. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1999; 31 (Suppl.): S624S630.Google Scholar
17Kraus, WE, Houmard, JA, Duscha, BD, Knetzger, KJ, Wharton, MB, McCartney, JS, et al. . Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. New England Journal of Medicine 2002; 347: 14831492.Google Scholar
18Kang, J, Robertson, RJ, Hagberg, JM, Kelley, DE, Goss, FL, DaSilva, SG, et al. . Effect of exercise intensity on glucose and insulin metabolism in obese individuals and obese NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 341349.Google Scholar
19Thompson, PD, Buchner, D, Piña, IL, Balady, GJ, Williams, MA, Marcus, BH, et al. . Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity). Circulation 2003; 107: 31093116.Google Scholar
20Lee, IM, Skerret, PJ. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose–response relation? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2001; 33 (Suppl.): S459S471.Google Scholar
21Warburton, DER, Nicol, CW, Bredin, SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 2006; 174 6: 801808.Google Scholar
22Pate, RR, Pratt, M, Blair, SN, Haskell, WL, Macera, CA, Bouchard, C, et al. . Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402407.Google Scholar
23Jakicic, JM, Clark, K, Coleman, E, Donnelly, J, Foreyt, J, Melanson, E, et al. . American College of Sports Medicine position stand; Appropriate intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2001; 33 (12): 21452156.Google Scholar
24Andersen, RE, Wadden, TA, Bartlett, SJ, Zemel, B, Verde, TJ, Franckowiak, SC. Effects of lifestyle activity vs structured aerobic exercise in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA 1999; 281: 335340.Google Scholar
25Saris, WH, Blair, SN, van Baak, MA, Eaton, SB, Davies, PSW, Di Pietro, L, et al. . How much physical activity is enough to prevent unhealthy weight gain? Outcome of the IASO 1st Stock Conference and consensus statement. Obesity Review 2003; 4: 101114.Google Scholar
26Jakicic, JM. Exercise in the treatment of obesity. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America 2003; 32 (4): 967980.Google Scholar
27Rubio, MA, Salas-Salvadó, J, Barbany, M, Moreno, B, Aranceta, J, Bellido, D, et al. . Consenso SEEDO 2007 para la evaluación del sobrepeso y la obesidad y el establecimiento de criterios de intervención terapéutica. Revista Española de Obesidad 2007; 5 (3): 548.Google Scholar
28Tudor-Locke, CE, Bell, RC, Myers, AM, Harris, SB, Lauzon, N, Rodger, NW. Pedometer-determined ambulatory activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2002; 55 3: 191199.Google Scholar
29Di Pietro, L, Dziura, J, Blair, SN. Estimated change in physical activity level (PAL) and prediction of 5-year weight change in men: the aerobic Center Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Obesity Related Metabolic Disorders 2004; 28: 15411547.Google Scholar
30Jakicic, JM, Wing, RR, Butler, BA, Robertson, RJ. Prescribing exercise in multiple short bouts versus one continuous bout: effects of adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness, and weight loss in overweight women. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1995; 19: 893901.Google Scholar
31Fletcher, GF, Balady, GJ, Amsterdam, EA, Chaitman, B, Eckel, R, Fleg, J, et al. . Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001; 104: 16941740.Google Scholar
32Stewart, KJ. Physical activity and ageing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2005; 1055: 193206.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Approximate energy expenditure for activity levels

Figure 1

Table 2 Different recommendations for doing physical activity

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Physical activity pyramid proposal for adults27

Figure 3

Table 3 Method of evaluating the predisposition to a change in the behaviour towards physical activity

Figure 4

Table 4 Risk classification for physical training. Class A: apparently healthy individuals