Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article

Delay discounting and its association with food purchasing considerations and food availability in the home in south-east Alabama, USA

  • Kimberly B Garza (a1), Christiana Datubo-Brown (a2), Philippe Gaillard (a3) and Ruth Jeminiwa (a1)

Abstract

Objective

Certain factors, such as food quality, label content and grocery characteristics, may be considered when purchasing foods. Food availability in the home has been shown to influence dietary behaviours, also associated with delay discounting (DD). The present study sought to characterize the relationships between DD, food purchasing considerations and healthfulness of foods in the home.

Design

A cross-sectional, online survey of adults (n 477) was conducted with the following measures: DD, consideration of food quality (nutrition, taste) and grocery characteristics (price, ease of preparation, shelf-life) while shopping, use of food labels and food availability in the home. DD was assessed by the area under the delay discounting curve (AUC) using a binary choice task. Greater AUC reflects lower DD. Structural equation modelling was used to allow AUC to simultaneously predict purchasing considerations and foods in the home.

Setting

Online survey.

Participants

Adult employees in south-east Alabama, USA.

Results

DD was negatively associated with food label use and emphasis on food quality when shopping (P<0·001). In the final model, DD was associated with availability of healthful foods in the home and emphasis on food quality and grocery characteristics. About 33 % of the variance in shopping behaviours, 5 % in food label use, 7 % in availability of healthful foods and 4 % in availability of unhealthful foods was explained by DD.

Conclusions

Individuals with lower DD appear to be more thoughtful in making food purchasing decisions and have healthful foods available in the home more frequently than individuals with higher DD.

Copyright

© The Authors 2018 

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email kbl0005@auburn.edu

References

Hide All
1. Ainslie, G (2001) Breakdown of Will. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Appelhans, BM, Waring, ME, Schneider, KL et al. (2012) Delay discounting and intake of ready-to-eat and away-from-home foods in overweight and obese women. Appetite 59, 576–584.
3. Garza, KB, Ding, M, Owensby, JK et al. (2016) Impulsivity and fast-food consumption: a cross-sectional study among working adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 116, 61–68.
4. Garza, KB, Harris, CV & Bolding, MS (2013) Examination of value of the future and health beliefs to explain dietary and physical activity behaviors. Res Social Adm Pharm 9, 851–862.
5. Huston, SJ & Finke, MS (2003) Diet choice and the role of time preference. J Consum Aff 37, 143–160.
6. Campos, S, Doxey, J & Hammond, D (2011) Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 14, 1496–1506.
7. Fitzgerald, N, Damio, G, Segura-Perez, S et al. (2008) Nutrition knowledge, food label use, and food intake patterns among Latinas with and without type 2 diabetes. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 960–967.
8. Kim, S & Douthitt, RA (2004) The role of dietary information in women’s whole milk and low-fat milk intakes. Int J Consum Stud 28, 245–254.
9. Neuhouser, ML, Kristal, AR & Patterson, RE (1999) Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 45–53.
10. Signal, L, Lanumata, T, Robinson, J-A et al. (2008) Perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Māori, Pacific and low-income shoppers. Public Health Nutr 11, 706–713.
11. Maubach, N, Hoek, J & McCreanor, T (2009) An exploration of parents’ food purchasing behaviours. Appetite 53, 297–302.
12. Graham, DJ, Lucas-Thompson, RG, Mueller, MP et al. (2017) Impact of explained v. unexplained front-of-package nutrition labels on parent and child food choices: a randomized trial. Public Health Nutr 20, 774–785.
13. Ni Mhurchu, C, Eyles, H, Jiang, Y et al. (2018) Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial. Appetite 121, 360–365.
14. Christoph, MJ, Larson, N, Laska, MN et al. (2018) Nutrition facts panels: who uses them, what do they use, and how does use relate to dietary intake? J Acad Nutr Diet 118, 217–228.
15. Blitstein, JL & Evans, WD (2006) Use of nutrition facts panels among adults who make household food purchasing decisions. J Nutr Educ Behav 38, 360–364.
16. McArthur, L, Chamberlain, V & Howard, AB (2001) Behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge of low-income consumers regarding nutrition labels. J Health Care Poor Underserved 12, 415–428.
17. Jilcott, SB, Laraia, BA, Evenson, KR et al. (2009) Perceptions of the community food environment and related influences on food choice among midlife women residing in rural and urban areas: a qualitative analysis. Women Health 49, 164–180.
18. Block, J, Scribner, R & Karen, B (2004) Fast food, race/ethnicity, and income: a geographic analysis. Am J Prev Med 27, 211–217.
19. Inglis, V, Ball, K & Crawford, D (2009) Does modifying the household food budget predict changes in the healthfulness of purchasing choices among low- and high-income women? Appetite 52, 273–279.
20. McKinnon, L, Giskes, K & Turrell, G (2014) The contribution of three components of nutrition knowledge to socio-economic differences in food purchasing choices. Public Health Nutr 17, 1814–1824.
21. Miller, CK & Branscum, P (2012) The effect of a recessionary economy on food choice: implications for nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 100–106.
22. Milosevic, J, Zezelj, I, Gorton, M et al. (2012) Understanding the motives for food choice in western Balkan countries. Appetite 58, 205–214.
23. Honkanen, P, Olsen, SO, Verplanken, B et al. (2012) Reflective and impulsive influences on unhealthy snacking. The moderating effects of food related self-control. Appetite 58, 616–622.
24. Campbell, KJ, Crawford, DA, Salmon, J et al. (2007) Associations between the home food environment and obesity-promoting eating behaviors in adolescence. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15, 719–730.
25. Ding, D, Sallis, JF, Norman, GJ et al. (2012) Community food environment, home food environment, and fruit and vegetable intake of children and adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 634–638.
26. Kegler, MC, Alcantara, I, Haardorfer, R et al. (2014) The influence of home food environments on eating behaviors of overweight and obese women. J Nutr Educ Behav 46, 188–196.
27. Gorin, AA, Phelan, S, Raynor, H et al. (2011) Home food and exercise environments of normal-weight and overweight adults. Am J Health Behav 35, 618–626.
28. Kerr, DA, Harray, AJ, Pollard, CM et al. (2016) The connecting health and technology study: a 6-month randomized controlled trial to improve nutrition behaviours using a mobile food record and text messaging support in young adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13, 52.
29. Kullgren, JT, Troxel, AB, Loewenstein, G et al. (2016) A randomized controlled trial of employer matching of employees’ monetary contributions to deposit contracts to promote weight loss. Am J Health Promot 30, 441–452.
30. Rogers, T, Milkman, KL & Volpp, KG (2014) Commitment devices: using initiatives to change behavior. JAMA 311, 2065–2066.
31. Leahey, T & Rosen, J (2014) DietBet: a web-based program that uses social gaming and financial incentives to promote weight loss. JMIR Serious Games 2, e2.
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey – Flexible Consumer Behavior Survey. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.
33. Chapman, GB & Elstein, AS (1995) Valuing the future: temporal discounting of health and money. Med Decis Making 15, 373–386.
34. Du, W, Green, L & Myerson, J (2002) Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Rec 52, 479–492.
35. Myerson, J, Green, L & Warusawitharana, M (2001) Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 76, 235–243.
36. Muthén, LK & Muthén, BO (1998–2011) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
37. Acock, AC (2005) Working with missing values. J Marriage Fam 67, 1012–1028.
38. Wheaton, B, Muthén, B, Alwin, DF et al. (1977) Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol Methodol 8, 84–136.
39. Rasberry, CN, Chaney, BH, Housman, JM et al. (2007) Determinants of nutrition label use among college students. Am J Health Educ 38, 76–82.
40. Lin, CT, Lee, JY & Yen, ST (2004) Do dietary intakes affect search for nutrient information on food labels? Soc Sci Med 59, 1955–1967.
41. Kraft, FB & Goodell, PW (1993) Identifying the health conscious consumer. J Health Care Mark 13, 18–25.

Keywords

Delay discounting and its association with food purchasing considerations and food availability in the home in south-east Alabama, USA

  • Kimberly B Garza (a1), Christiana Datubo-Brown (a2), Philippe Gaillard (a3) and Ruth Jeminiwa (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed