1.European Commission (2002) Science and Society Action Plan. Brussels: European Commission.
3.Horey, D (2010) Consumer Involvement in the Cochrane Collaboration: Background Paper. Auckland: Cochrane Collaboration.
4.European Food Safety Authority, Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (2010) Scientific Opinion on principles for deriving and applying Dietary Reference Values. EFSA J 8, 1458.
5.World Health Organization (1996) Preparation and Use of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation. Geneva: WHO.
6.Entwistle, VA, Renfrew, MJ, Yearley, Set al. (1998) Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. BMJ 316, 463–466.
7.Saunders, C & Girgis, A (2010) Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research. Health Res Policy Syst 8, 34.
8.European Commission (2000) Science, Society and Citizens in Europe. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
9.Timotijevic, L, Raats, MM, Barnett, Jet al. (2010) From micronutrient recommendations to policy: consumer and stakeholder involvement. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, Suppl. 2, S31–S37.
10.World Health Organization (1978) Declaration of Alma-Ata. Geneva: WHO.
11.European Commission (2001) European Governance: A White Paper. COM (2001) 428 Final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
12.Irwin, A & Michael, M (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
13.Boote, J, Telford, R & Cooper, C (2002) Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 61, 213–236.
14.Williamson, C (1998) The rise of doctor–patient working groups. BMJ 317, 1374–1377.
15.Baggott, R & Forster, R (2008) Health consumer and patients’ organizations in Europe: towards a comparative analysis. Health Expect 11, 85–94.
16.Telford, R, Beverley, C, Cooper, Cet al. (2002) Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction? Br J Clin Govern 7, 92–103.
17.Arnstein, SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35, 216–224.
18.Tritter, JQ & McCallum, A (2006) The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76, 156–168.
19.Hanley, B, Truesdale, A, King, Aet al. (2001) Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. BMJ 322, 519–523.
20.Oliver, S, Clarke-Jones, L, Rees, Ret al. (2004) Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess 8, issue 15, 1–148.
21.Rowe, G & Frewer, LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 30, 251–290.
22.Nilsen, E, Myrhaug, H, Johansen, Met al. (2006) Methods of consumer involvement in the development of healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev issue 3, CD004563.
23.Rowe, G, Rawsthorne, D, Scarpello, Tet al. (2010) Public engagement in research funding: a study of public capabilities and engagement methodology. Public Underst Sci 19, 225–239.
24.Walls, J, Rowe, G & Frewer, L (2011) Stakeholder engagement in food risk management: evaluation of an iterated workshop approach. Public Underst Sci 20, 241–260.
25.Brown, KA, Timotijevic, L, Barnett, Jet al. (2011) A review of consumer awareness, understanding and use of food-based dietary guidelines. Br J Nutr 106, 15–26.
26.Brown, KA, Timotijevic, L, Barnett, Jet al. (2011) Micronutrient recommendation stakeholders’ beliefs on dietary guidelines: a qualitative study across six European countries/regions. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 872–874.
27.Boyatzis, RE (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28.Joffe, H & Yardley, L (2004) Content and thematic analysis. In Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, pp. 56–68 [D Marks and L Yardley, editors]. London: SAGE Publications.
29.Maranta, A, Guggenheim, M, Gisler, Pet al. (2003) The reality of experts and the imagined lay person. Acta Sociol 46, 150–165.
30.Crawford, MJ, Rutter, D, Manley, Cet al. (2002) Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 325, 1263–1265.
31.Schunemann, HJ, Fretheim, A & Oxman, AD (2006) Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst 4, 22.
32.Norris, SL, Holmer, HK, Burda, BUet al. (2012) Conflict of interest policies for organizations producing a large number of clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One 7, e37413.
33.Government Office for Science (2011) Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees (CoPSAC 2011). London: Government Office for Science.
34.Schütz, T, Herbst, B & Koller, M (2006) Methodology for the development of the ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr 25, 203–209.
35.Harris, RP, Helfand, M, Woolf, SHet al. (2001) Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 20, 21–35.
36.House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000) Science and Society (Third Report). London: HMSO.
37.Vale, CL, Thompson, LC, Murphy, Cet al. (2012) Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council (MRC) clinical trials unit: results of a survey. Trials 13, 9.
38.Coveney, J (2008) Food and trust in Australia: building a picture. Public Health Nutr 11, 237–245.
39.Fischler, C (1988) Food, self and identity. Soc Sci Inform 27, 275–292.
40.Doets, EL, de Wit, LS, Dhonukshe-Rutten, RAMet al. (2008) Current micronutrient recommendations in Europe: towards understanding their differences and similarities. Eur J Nutr 47, 17–40.
41.Fudge, N, Wolfe, CDA & McKevitt, C (2008) Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. BMJ 336, 313–317.
42.Kelson, M (2005) The NICE patient involvement unit. Evid Based Healthcare Public Health 9, 304–307.
43.Telford, R, Boote, JD & Cooper, CL (2004) What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect 7, 209–220.