1.Cox, DN & Anderson, AS (2004) Food choice. In Public Health Nutrition, p. 152 [MJ Gibney, BM Margetts, JM Kearney et al., editors]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
2.Kramer, MS (1987) Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 65, 663–737.
3.Scottish Low Birthweight Study Group (1992) The Scottish Low Birthweight Study: I Survival. Growth, neuromotor and sensory impairment. Arch Dis Child 67, 675–681.
4.Gregory, J, Lowe, S, Bates, C et al. (2000) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4 to 18 years. London: The Stationery Office.
5.Doyle, W, Crawford, MA, Wynn, AHA et al. (1990) The association between maternal diet and birth dimensions. J Nutr Med 1, 9–17.
6.Health Education Authority (1999) Promoting the Health of Teenage and Lone Mothers. Setting a Research Agenda. Report of the Health Education Authority Expert Working Group chaired by Kaye Wellings. London: Health Education Authority.
7.Department of Health (2005) NHS Maternity Statistics, England: 2003–2004. London: Department of Health.
8.Brug, J, Steenhuis, I, Van Assema, P et al. (1996) The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 25, 236–242.
9.Baker, AH & Wardle, J (2002) Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among adults attending colorectal cancer screening: the efficacy of a brief tailored intervention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11, 203–206.
10.Baker, AH & Wardle, J (1999) Low intensity, high impact: can low intensity interventions change behaviour? Presented at Psychology and the Renaissance of Health, 13th Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, Florence, Italy, 1–3 October 1999.
11.De Vries, H & Brug, J (1999) Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 36, 99–105.
12.Ryan, P & Lauver, DR (2002) The efficacy of tailored interventions. J Nursing Scholarsh 4, 331–337.
13.Brug, J, Campbell, M & van Assema, P (1999) The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 36, 145–156.
14.Kroeze, W, Werkman, A & Brug, J (2006) A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 31, 205–223.
15.Ajzen, I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50, 179–211.
16.Cardinal, B (1995) Methods, issues, and results in evaluation and research: construct validity of stages of change for exercise behavior. Am J Health Promot 12, 68–74.
18.Baker, A, Bakhshi, S, Surujlal-Harry, A et al. (2005) The efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour in predicting dietary behaviour for different foods in different groups. Psychol Health 10, Suppl. 1, 19.
19.Roe, L, Strong, C, Whiteside, C et al. (1994) Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for assessment. Fam Pract 11, 375–381.
20.Cohen, J (1992) Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer – group of 3. Psychol Bull 1, 155–159.
21.Campbell, MK, Elbourne, DR & Altman, DG (2004) CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 328, 702–708.
22.Pinheiro, JC & Bates, DM (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer Verlag.
23.Rigby, RA & Stasinopoulos, DM (2005) Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (with discussion). Appl Stat 54, 507–554.
24.Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A et al. (1994) Comparisons of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food frequency questionnaires and estimated diet records. Br J Nutr 72, 619–643.
25.Ritterband, LM, Gonder-Frederick, LA & Cox, DJ (2003) Internet interventions: in review, in use, and into the future. Prof Psychol Res Pr 34, 527–534.
26.Heimendinger, J, O’Neill, C, Marcus, AC et al. (2005) Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 10, Suppl. 1, 65–82.
27.Giroti, A, Smith, MA, Walker, L et al. (1995) Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in second and third grade students. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 9 Suppl. 1, 37.
28.Mangunkusumo, R, Brug, J, de Koning, H et al. (2007) School-based Internet-tailored fruit and vegetable education combined with brief counselling increases children’s awareness of intake levels. Public Health Nutr 10, 273–279.
29.Haerens, L, De Bourdeaudhuij, I, Maes, L et al. (2007) The effects of a middle-school healthy eating intervention on adolescents’ fat and fruit intake and soft drink consumption. Public Health Nutr 10, 443–449.
30.Campbell, M, DeVellis, BM, Strecher, VJ et al. (1994) Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary health settings. Am J Public Health 84, 783–787.
31.Campbell, MK, Tessaro, I, DeVellis, B et al. (2002) Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women. Prev Med 34, 313–323.
32.Adamson, AJ, Curtis, PJ, Loughridge, J et al. (2000) A family-based intervention to increase consumption of starchy foods. Nutr Food Sci 30, 19–23.
33.Comrie, F, Cochrane, N, Aucott, Let al. (2006) Design and implementation of an Internet dietary assessment method for use in a student population. Poster presented at 6th International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods, Copenhagen, 27–29 April 2006.
34.Hyskey, S & Troop, NA (2002) Online longitudinal survey research: viability and participation. In Psychology and the Internet (special issue). Soc Sci Comput Rev Arch 20, 250–259.
35.Oenema, A, Brug, J & Lechner, L (2001) Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomised controlled trial. Health Educ Res 16, 647–660.
36.Mangunkusumo, RT, Brug, J, Duisterhout, JS et al. (2007) Feasibility, acceptability, and quality of Internet-administered adolescent health promotion in a preventive-care setting. Health Education Res 22, 1–13.
37.Fotheringham, MJ, Owies, D, Leslie, E et al. (2000) Interactive health communication in preventive medicine. Internet-based strategies in teaching and research. Am J Prev Med 19, 113–120.