Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:40:57.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research Letter: Emotional reactivity to induced rumination predicts 1-year levels of depressive symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2009

CHRISTINE KUEHNER*
Affiliation:
Research Group Longitudinal and Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
KRISTIN LIEBSCH
Affiliation:
Research Group Longitudinal and Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
SILKE HUFFZIGER
Affiliation:
Research Group Longitudinal and Intervention Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
*
Address correspondence to: Christine Kuehner, Ph.D. Research Group Longitudinal and Intervention Research, Central Institute of Mental Health, P.O. Box 122120, D-68072 Mannheim, Germany. (Email: Christine.Kuehner@zi-mannheim.de)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Research Letter
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Ruminative coping in response to negative mood has been proposed as a vulnerability factor for depression. Habitual rumination negatively affects the course of dysphoric or depressive episodes, and an experimentally induced ruminative self-focus reliably impairs short-term emotional and cognitive processing in dysphoric individuals (e.g. Joorman & Siemer, Reference Joormann and Siemer2004; Rimes & Watkins, Reference Rimes and Watkins2005; Donaldson et al. Reference Donaldson, Lam and Mathews2007; Kuehner et al. Reference Kuehner, Holzhauer and Huffziger2007, Reference Kuehner, Huffziger and Liebsch2009; Nolen-Hoeksema et al. Reference Nolen-Hoeksema, Wisco and Lyubomirsky2008). However, the predictive value of individual reactivity to induced rumination, i.e. to an induced state of dysfunctional cognitive processing, has so far not been studied, although high reactivity towards a rumination priming procedure in dysphoric subjects could indicate a vulnerability factor for depression.

In a recent experimental investigation (Kuehner et al. Reference Kuehner, Huffziger and Liebsch2009), we randomized a non-clinical sample of 60 young adults after negative mood induction into a rumination, distraction, and mindful self-focus induction condition. In this study, induced rumination prolonged dysphoric mood and was linked to an increase in dysfunctional attitudes. In a subsample of participants scoring high on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), induced rumination also affected the cortisol stress response during the experimental session.

The aim of the present study was to expand previous research by exploring the role of individual emotional reactivity to induced rumination for the natural longitudinal course of depressive symptoms. For this purpose, we conducted a 1-year follow-up of the Kuehner et al. (Reference Kuehner, Huffziger and Liebsch2009) cohort. Our hypothesis was that higher individual levels of emotional reactivity to an induced ruminative self-focus at baseline would predict deterioration of depressive symptoms over time. In contrast, we did not expect respective longitudinal associations for the remaining induction conditions (distraction, mindful self-focus). Accordingly, the proposed effect difference across conditions should be demonstrated by a significant statistical interaction of emotional reactivity by induction group in the prediction of follow-up symptoms.

Follow-up participants were 56 undergraduate students (93.5% of the original cohort) from different faculties at the University of Mannheim, Germany. The follow-up examination took place after the experimental data of our study had been submitted. Full description of the experimental study is given by Kuehner et al. (Reference Kuehner, Huffziger and Liebsch2009). Briefly, participants were subjected to a negative mood induction, consisting of sad music and recall of negative life events for 6 min, and were subsequently randomly assigned to a rumination, distraction, or mindful self-focus induction for 8 min, with respective statements presented on cards (adapted paradigm from Lyubomirsky et al. Reference Lyubomirsky, Kasri and Zehm2003).

Depressive symptoms at baseline (before negative mood induction) and after 12 months were assessed with the BDI-II. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) was employed during the experimental session to assess mood change as a consequence of negative mood induction (T1–T2) and of response induction (rumination, distraction, mindful self focus, T2–T3). For the present analysis, we chose the PANAS negative affect (NA) difference score from T2 to T3 (PANAS-NA-T2T3) to assess individual emotional reactivity to response induction. The NA subscale of the PANAS was preferred over the positive affect (PA) subscale due to its broader empirical evaluation within the context of self-focused attention paradigms (e.g. Mor & Winquist, Reference Mor and Winquist2002)Footnote .

We performed a multiple regression analysis with BDI-II scores at follow-up as the dependent variable, and BDI-II scores at baseline, group status (rumination versus other conditionsFootnote ), PANAS-NA-T1T2, PANAS-NA-T2T3, and interaction of group status by PANAS-NA-T2T3 as independent variables. In addition, partial correlations between PANAS-NA-T2T3 and BDI-II scores at follow-up, controlled for BDI-II scores at baseline, were calculated separately for the rumination and the remaining condition.

The follow-up sample consisted of 29 women and 27 men aged 19–28 years (mean±s.d.=22.1±2.6). Baseline BDI-II scores did not differ between response induction groups [rumination (n=20): mean±s.d.=7.60±5.81; other (n=36): mean±s.d.=7.53±7.34, t(55)=−0.038, n.s.]. Participants’ BDI-II scores at follow-up (mean±s.d.=7.34±6.79) were similar to those at baseline [mean±s.d.=7.55±6.78; t(55)=−0.287, n.s.], and relative stability over 12 months amounted to r=0.662 (p<0.001).

Table 1 shows the results from the multiple regression analysis. BDI-II scores at 1-year follow-up were significantly predicted by BDI-II scores at baseline and by the interaction term of group status by PANAS-NA-T2T3. The significant interaction term indicates a different closeness of relationship between PANAS-NA-T2T3 at baseline and BDI-II outcome at 12 months across groups. Separate analyses showed a significant effect of PANAS-NA-T2T3 on BDI-II scores at follow-up in the rumination group [B=0.722, s.e.=0.332, t(19)=2.177, p=0.044], while this effect was not significant in the comparison group [B=−0.232, s.e.=0.197, t(35)=−1.177, n.s.]. Partial correlations between PANAS-NA-T2T3 and BDI-II scores at follow-up amounted to r=0.467 (p=0.044) in the rumination sample, and to r=−0.201 (n.s.) in the comparison sample. The positive sign of this coefficient in the rumination group indicates that a stronger increase in negative affect during induced rumination at baseline was linked to higher BDI-II scores at 1-year follow-up.

Table 1. Predictive effect of emotional reactivity to response induction on depressive symptoms at 1-year follow-up

BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd revision; PANAS-NA-T1T2, negative affect difference score (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, PANAS) from pre- to post-negative mood induction; PANAS-NA-T2T3, negative affect difference score (PANAS) from pre- to post-response induction.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess predictive effects of emotional reactivity to induced rumination for the longitudinal course of depressive symptoms. Our hypothesis of a specific detrimental effect of heightened reactivity towards rumination was confirmed. The finding that participants who displayed high emotional reactivity to the rumination induction showed higher levels of depressive symptoms over time gives a first hint that individual reactivity towards induced dysfunctional information processing may indicate a vulnerability factor for depression. Within this context, it is important to note that the observed association between emotional reactivity and symptom outcome at 1 year was not due to potential confound with baseline depression levels, since the latter were statistically controlled. While baseline depressive symptoms were highly predictive of future depressive symptoms, emotional reactivity to induced rumination contributed independently to the prediction of outcome.

Previous experimental research on cognitive vulnerability in depression has mainly focused on cognitive reactivity to negative mood priming procedures. Somewhat surprisingly, most of these studies have used remitted depression designs (cf. Lau et al. Reference Lau, Segal and Williams2004; Scher et al. Reference Scher, Ingram and Segal2005), which have been criticized due to their post-morbid approach and backward logic (Just et al. Reference Just, Abramson and Alloy2001). In contrast, research connecting experimentally identified vulnerability – operationalized as an individual difference variable – with a longitudinal design to explore its predictive value in non-clinical samples is clearly lacking. Our study is a first attempt to do so, and we were able to show that high emotional reactivity towards an induced ruminative self-focus during negative mood predicted an impaired long-term course of psychological wellbeing. More longitudinal research is now needed using larger, more heterogeneous samples and variations of experimental procedures to explore predictive effects of individual reactivity to induced dysfunctional information processing in a broader context, to assess its temporal stability, and to explore its role for predicting the onset of clinical episodes of depression.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grant DFG KU1464/1-4 to C.K.

Declaration of Interest

None.

Footnotes

Importantly, we did not expect predictive effects of individual reactivity to the negative mood induction itself, since mood priming studies have shown that vulnerable and non-vulnerable individuals experience similar mood deterioration (cf. Scher et al. Reference Scher, Ingram and Segal2005). However, following the suggestion of an anonymous reviewer, we included this variable as a covariate in the regression analysis shown in Table 1.

Preliminary analyses identified no differential effects of individual reactivity on the 1-year course of depressive symptoms between the distraction and mindful self-focus conditions [interaction group (distraction, mindfulness)×PANAS-NA-T2T3: B=−0.258, s.e.=0.452, t=−0.571, n.s.], therefore we collapsed the longitudinal data across these groups.

References

Donaldson, C, Lam, D, Mathews, A (2007). Rumination and attention in major depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 26642678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joormann, J, Siemer, M (2004). Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria: difficulties in repairing sad mood with happy memories? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113, 179188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, N, Abramson, LY, Alloy, LB (2001). Remitted depression studies as tests of the cognitive vulnerability hypotheses of depression onset: a critique and conceptual analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 21, 6383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuehner, C, Holzhauer, S, Huffziger, S (2007). Decreased cortisol response to awakening is associated with cognitive vulnerability to depression in a nonclinical sample of young adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32, 199209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehner, C, Huffziger, S, Liebsch, K (2009). Rumination, distraction and mindful self-focus: effects on mood, dysfunctional attitudes and cortisol stress response. Psychological Medicine 39, 219228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, MA, Segal, ZV, Williams, JMG (2004). Teasdale's differential activation hypothesis: implications for mechanisms of depressive relapse and suicidal behaviour. Behaviour Research and Therapy 42, 10011017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyubomirsky, S, Kasri, F, Zehm, K (2003). Dysphoric rumination impairs concentration on academic tasks. Cognitive Therapy and Research 27, 309330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mor, N, Winquist, J (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 128, 638662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolen-Hoeksema, S, Wisco, BE, Lyubomirsky, S (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 400424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimes, KA, Watkins, E (2005). The effects of self-focused rumination on global negative self-judgements in depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43, 16731681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scher, CD, Ingram, RE, Segal, ZV (2005). Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review 25, 487510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Predictive effect of emotional reactivity to response induction on depressive symptoms at 1-year follow-up