Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-jsbx8 Total loading time: 10.664 Render date: 2021-04-18T03:35:49.271Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Erratum
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

This article was published in Psychological Medicine with incorrect author information. MD Inagaki should be Masatoshi Inagaki and MD Stafford should be Lesley Stafford. This has since been updated as per the above.

References

Wu, Y., Levis, B., Riehm, K., Saadat, N., Levis, A., Azar, M., … Thombs, B. (n.d.). Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 113. doi:10.1017/S0033291719001314Google Scholar

This correction applies to the following article(s):

Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Yin Wu , Brooke Levis , Kira E. Riehm , Nazanin Saadat , Alexander W. Levis , Marleine Azar , Danielle B. Rice , Jill Boruff , Pim Cuijpers , Simon Gilbody , John P.A. Ioannidis , Lorie A. Kloda , Dean McMillan , Scott B. Patten , Ian Shrier , Roy C. Ziegelstein , Dickens H. Akena , Bruce Arroll , Liat Ayalon , Hamid R. Baradaran , Murray Baron , Charles H. Bombardier , Peter Butterworth , Gregory Carter , Marcos H. Chagas , Juliana C. N. Chan , Rushina Cholera , Yeates Conwell , Janneke M. de Man-van Ginkel , Jesse R. Fann , Felix H. Fischer , Daniel Fung , Bizu Gelaye , Felicity Goodyear-Smith , Catherine G. Greeno , Brian J. Hall , Patricia A. Harrison , Martin Härter , Ulrich Hegerl , Leanne Hides , Stevan E. Hobfoll , Marie Hudson , Thomas Hyphantis , Masatoshi Inagaki , Nathalie Jetté , Mohammad E. Khamseh , Kim M. Kiely , Yunxin Kwan , Femke Lamers , Shen-Ing Liu , Manote Lotrakul , Sonia R. Loureiro , Bernd Löwe , Anthony McGuire , Sherina Mohd-Sidik , Tiago N. Munhoz , Kumiko Muramatsu , Flávia L. Osório , Vikram Patel , Brian W. Pence , Philippe Persoons , Angelo Picardi , Katrin Reuter , Alasdair G. Rooney , Iná S. Santos , Juwita Shaaban , Abbey Sidebottom , Adam Simning , Lesley Stafford , Sharon Sung , Pei Lin Lynnette Tan , Alyna Turner , Henk C. van Weert , Jennifer White , Mary A. Whooley , Kirsty Winkley , Mitsuhiko Yamada , Andrea Benedetti  and Brett D. Thombs [Opens in a new window]Brett D. Thombs  

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 261
Total number of PDF views: 478 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th August 2019 - 18th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *