Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T08:02:45.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of certainty, modality shift and guess outcome on evoked potentials and reaction times in chronic schizophrenics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Rolf Verleger  and
Rudolf Cohen
Rolf Verleger
Affiliation:
Fachgruppe Psychologie, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
Rudolf Cohen*
Affiliation:
Fachgruppe Psychologie, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
*
2Address for correspondence: Professor Dr Rudolf Cohen, Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Psychologie/Soziologie, Postfach 7733, 7750 Konstanz, Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Evoked potentials and reaction times were obtained from chronic schizophrenics and normal controls to light and sound stimuli presented in random order. In the ‘ certain’ condition subjects were told what the next stimulus would be, in the ‘uncertain’ condition they were asked to guess. Amplitudes were usually larger for normals than for schizophrenics, for ‘uncertain’ than for ‘certain’ conditions, and in cross- than in ipsimodal stimulus-sequences. The effect of certainty was stronger in normals across 4 leads; so was the effect of modality shift at vertex. While these findings replicate earlier results from acute schizophrenics, no condition x group interactions could be found in the reaction time measures.

Two additional results were interpreted as showing basically different attitudes with respect to the predictability of events: (1) there was a slow positivity between the verbal information and the following stimuli which was largest for schizophrenics in the conditions of certainty; (2) while normals showed long-term habituation only in N1- but not in P3-amplitudes, the reverse was true for schizophrenics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 81 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broen, W. E. (1968). Schizophrenia: Research and Theory. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A. & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 39, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cromwell, R. L. (1972). Strategies for studying schizophrenic behaviour. Psychopharmacologia 24, 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromwell, R. L. (1975). Assessment of schizophrenia. In Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 26 (ed. Rosen-zweig, M. R. and Porter, L. W.), pp. 593–619. Annual Reviews Inc.: Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Garmezy, N. (1966). The prediction of performance in schizophrenia. In Psychopathology of Schizophrenia (ed. Hoch, P. and Zubin, J.), pp. 129–181. Grune & Stratton: New York.Google Scholar
Irwin, L. & Renner, E. (1969). Effect of praise and censure on the performance of schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levit, R. A., Sutton, S. & Zubin, J. (1973). Evoked potential correlates of information processing in psychiatric patients. Psychological Medicine 3, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Näätänen, R. (1975). Selective attention and evoked potentials in humans – a critical review. Biological Psychology 2, 237–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwent, V. L., Hillyard, S. A. & Galambos, R. (1976). Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 40, 604–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shagass, C. (1976). An electrophysiological view of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 11, 3–30.Google Scholar
Silverman, J. (1967). Variations in cognitive control and psychophysiological defense in the schizophrenias. Psychosomatic Medicine 29, 225–251.Google Scholar
Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C. & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 38, 387–401.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. & Tueting, P. (1975). The sensitivity of the evoked potential to psychological variables. In Research in Psycho-physiology (ed. Venables, P. H. and Christie, M. J.), pp. 351–363. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. & Zubin, J. (1965). Effect of sequence on reaction time in schizophrenia. In Behavior, Aging and the Nervous System (ed. Welford, A. T. and Birren, J. E.), pp. 562–597. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield.Google Scholar
Tueting, P. & Levit, R. A. (1977). Long-term changes in evoked potentials of normals, psychotic depressives and schizophrenics. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Waldbaum, J. K., Sutton, S. & Kerr, J. (1975). Shift of sensory modality and reaction time in schizophrenia. In Experimental Approaches to Psychopaihology (ed. Kietzman, M. L., Sutton, S. and Zubin, J.), pp. 167–176. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Brown, G. W. (1970). Institutionalism and Schizophrenia. Cambridge University Press: London.Google Scholar