Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T00:07:26.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A critique of biological psychiatry1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

Bernard, C. (1865). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Mendicine. (Translated by Green, Henry Copley, 1957.) Dover: New York.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophysiology: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind–Brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Guze, S. B. (1989). Biological Psychiatry: is there any other kind? Psychological Medicine 19, 315323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, E. R. & Schwartz, J. H. (eds.) (1985). Principles of Neural Science, 2nd. edn.Elsevier: New York.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, I. K. (1987). I think, therefore I … British Medical Journal 296, 1201.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. (1989). An open mind. Nature 339, 2526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Harvester: Brighton.Google Scholar
Rose, S. P. R. (1987). Molecules and Minds. Open University Press: Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1989). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar