Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:20:36.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attributions about common bodily sensations: their associations with hypochondriasis and anxiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1998

A. K. MacLEOD
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London; and Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, West Middlesex University Hospital, London
C. HAYNES
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London; and Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, West Middlesex University Hospital, London
T. SENSKY
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London; and Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, West Middlesex University Hospital, London

Abstract

Background. Causal attributions about bodily sensations may determine help-seeking and influence patients' demands for medical treatment. The present study aimed to differentiate the causal attributions associated with health-related and non-health-related anxiety.

Methods. Anxious hypochondriacal, generally anxious, and non-anxious general practice attenders were compared on their propensity to give somatic, psychological or normalizing attributions for common bodily sensations, measured by number of each type of attribution in a given time period and the frequency of first response of each type.

Results. The groups differed in all three types of attributions. Giving more psychological and fewer normalizing attributions was related to general anxiety whereas giving more somatic attributions was related specifically to hypochondriasis.

Conclusions. Anxiety and hypochondriasis can be distinguished in terms of their associated patterns of attributions for bodily sensations, reinforcing the importance of attributional processes and interventions which use reattributional training.

Type
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)