No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Women's Caucus for Political Science: Five Views of Its Significance Today
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1049096500033308/resource/name/firstPage-S1049096500033308a.jpg)
- Type
- News
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1990
References
Aisenberg, Nadya and Harrington, Mona. 1988. Women of Academe: Outsider in the Sacred Grove. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Houston Chronicle, November 6, 1989. “The Condition of the Professoriate: Attitudes and Trends 1989.” A report by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joyce M.
1990. “The Women's Caucus for Political Science: A View of the ‘Founding.’” PS, June 1990, 204–209.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1970. “The Political Scientist Decides: An Examination of the 1969 APSA Ballots.” PS, Summer 1970, 313.Google Scholar
Prestage, Jewel L.
1989. “Career Development Patterns of Black Women Political Science Doctorates: The Predoctoral Years.” Presented at the annual meeting of the National Conference of Black Political Scientists, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar