Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:43:42.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Untangled Web: Internet Use during the 1998 Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David A. Dulio ,
Donald L. Goff  and
James A. Thurber
David A. Dulio
Affiliation:
American University
Donald L. Goff
Affiliation:
American University
James A. Thurber
Affiliation:
American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the 1996 election cycle, candidates for public office began to use the Internet as a campaign tool (Browning 1996; Casey 1996; Rash 1997). As Internet use grew among the general population, it was reasonable to expect that the 1998 election cycle would see increased use of this new medium by political candidates, and new methods and techniques developed to exploit its capabilities.

In increasing numbers, House and Senate candidates campaigned along the information superhighway in 1998. While very few candidates had web sites in previous elections (Browning 1996), by October 1998 more than two-thirds of the candidates for U.S. Senate and for U.S. House open seats had established web sites. In the past, candidate web sites were little more than digital yard signs (Casey 1996). In 1998, candidates made use of their sites to solicit small-dollar contributions however better, particularly by using them.

Like it or not, the Internet is now a campaign tool that many campaigns employ. Therefore, we believe the manner in which it is used needs to be investigated. In this article we pay particular attention to candidates' solicitation of campaign contributions over the Internet. Our analysis is mostly descriptive as we try to summarize the Internet activity of candidates in a sample of Senate and House races during 1998.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 53 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Funding for this research was provided, in part, by a grant from The Pew Charitable Trusts to American University's Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies and Campaign Management Institute in a grant focused on “Improving Campaign Conduct.”

1.

Names of authors appear in alphabetical order.

References

Aldrich, John A. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonchek, Mark S. 1996. “Grassroots in Cyberspace.” Harvard University Political Participation Project. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Browning, Grahame. 1996. Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Influence American Politics. Wilten, CT: Pemberton Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Chris. 1996. The Hill on the Net: Congress Enters the Information Age. Boston: AP Professional.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Homestyle: House Members in their Districts. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Kamarck, Elaine. 1998. “Campaigning on the Internet in the Off Year Elections of 1998.” Visions of Governance in the Twenty-First Century <www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/agenda.htm>. December 23, 1998.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Komarow, Steve. 1998. “Politicians Take First Steps into Medium that May Hold Huge Potential in Elections.” USA Today, November 4.Google Scholar
Rash, Wayne Jr. 1997. Politics on the Net: Wiring the Political Process. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar