Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:28:18.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specifying the Cultural Foundations of Consensual Democratic Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

Charles Lockhart
Charles Lockhart
Affiliation:
Texas Christian University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his influential study of persistently democratic societies Lijphart (1999) argues for the general superiority of “consensus” over “majoritarian” institutions. Consensus institutions disperse power among distinct elements of a broad majority, while majoritarian institutions concentrate power in centralized institutions based on bare electoral majorities or pluralities. Lijphart finds that consensus institutions achieve levels of macroeconomic management and violence control similar to those of their majoritarian counterparts and perform considerably better representing various segments of society. In reflecting on his study, Lijphart offers the thought that highly effective consensus institutions would likely interact symbiotically with a “consensual political culture” (1999, 306). That is, Lijphart proposes that a consensual political culture, coupled with consensus institutions, would produce better government performance than consensus institutions. Yet he leaves the nature of such a culture unclear.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 731 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Douglas, Mary. 1978. Cultural Bias. London: Royal Anthropological Society.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1897] 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Translated by Spaulding, J.A. and Simpson, G.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of the Nilotic People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grendstad, Gunnar. 1999. “A Political Cultural Map of Europe: A Survey Approach.” GeoJournal 47 (3): 463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lockhart, Charles. 2011. “What Would Lijphart's ‘Consensual Political Culture’ Be Like? Comparing Inglehart's Postmaterialism and Cultural Theory To Identify Crucial Features,” unpublished paper available online at: http://www.pol.tcu.edu/faculty_staff/lockhart.htm.Google Scholar
Lockhart, Charles, and Giles-Sims, Jean. 2010. Aging across the United States: Matching Needs to States' Differing Opportunities and Services. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael, Ellis, Richard, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1994. “Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context: Cultural Contributions to a Theory of Rational Choices.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (2): 131–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2010. Worldwide Governance Indicators, 2000 available online at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp.Google Scholar